基于青霉素结合蛋白基因型的流感嗜血杆菌耐药性分类与药敏试验结果的相关性

Yumiko Funashima, Yoshihiro Nagasawa, Taeko Narita, Hiroki Hanaiwa, Zenzo Nagasawa
{"title":"基于青霉素结合蛋白基因型的流感嗜血杆菌耐药性分类与药敏试验结果的相关性","authors":"Yumiko Funashima,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Nagasawa,&nbsp;Taeko Narita,&nbsp;Hiroki Hanaiwa,&nbsp;Zenzo Nagasawa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are several problems associated with antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i>. β-Lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant <i>H. influenzae</i> (BLNAR) isolates with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ampicillin (ABPC) <4 mg/l will be classified as susceptible according to the MIC breakpoint of the CLSI M100 criteria, in spite of harboring penicillin-binding protein (PBP) mutations that cause ABPC resistance. A total of 103 isolates were collected from clinical materials for analysis. The genotypes of the PBP mutations were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. The WalkAway 96 Plus (WALKAWAY), dry plate Eiken (DP-EIKEN), and RAISUS S4 systems (RAISUS) were used for AST. HTM broth was used as the culture medium for WALKAWAY, Mueller‒Hinton broth with 5% lysed horse blood for DP-EIKEN, and HTM with 5% horse serum for RAISUS. The MIC concordance rates of ABPC for g-BLNAR, for RAISUS vs. DP-EIKEN, RAISUS vs. WALKAWAY, and DP-EIKEN vs. WALKAWAY were 96.1, 86.4, and 85.4%, respectively. WALKAWAY had a low correlation with the other two systems. Moreover, concordance rates of ABPC MIC ≥4 mg/l, which is considered as resistant, of 69 g-BLNAR isolates for the RAISUS, DP-EIKEN, and WALKAWAY systems were 68.1, 58.0, and 37.7%, respectively. Therefore, in Japan, where the BLNAR strain is isolated at a high frequency, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of the measuring systems to appropriately interpret the test results.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"30 1","pages":"7-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlations between Resistance Classifications Based on Penicillin-Binding Protein Genotypes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Results of <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Yumiko Funashima,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Nagasawa,&nbsp;Taeko Narita,&nbsp;Hiroki Hanaiwa,&nbsp;Zenzo Nagasawa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are several problems associated with antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i>. β-Lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant <i>H. influenzae</i> (BLNAR) isolates with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ampicillin (ABPC) <4 mg/l will be classified as susceptible according to the MIC breakpoint of the CLSI M100 criteria, in spite of harboring penicillin-binding protein (PBP) mutations that cause ABPC resistance. A total of 103 isolates were collected from clinical materials for analysis. The genotypes of the PBP mutations were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. The WalkAway 96 Plus (WALKAWAY), dry plate Eiken (DP-EIKEN), and RAISUS S4 systems (RAISUS) were used for AST. HTM broth was used as the culture medium for WALKAWAY, Mueller‒Hinton broth with 5% lysed horse blood for DP-EIKEN, and HTM with 5% horse serum for RAISUS. The MIC concordance rates of ABPC for g-BLNAR, for RAISUS vs. DP-EIKEN, RAISUS vs. WALKAWAY, and DP-EIKEN vs. WALKAWAY were 96.1, 86.4, and 85.4%, respectively. WALKAWAY had a low correlation with the other two systems. Moreover, concordance rates of ABPC MIC ≥4 mg/l, which is considered as resistant, of 69 g-BLNAR isolates for the RAISUS, DP-EIKEN, and WALKAWAY systems were 68.1, 58.0, and 37.7%, respectively. Therefore, in Japan, where the BLNAR strain is isolated at a high frequency, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of the measuring systems to appropriately interpret the test results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"7-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与流感嗜血杆菌抗菌素敏感性试验(AST)相关的几个问题。具有氨苄西林最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的β-内酰胺酶阴性耐氨苄西林流感嗜血杆菌(BLNAR)分离株
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlations between Resistance Classifications Based on Penicillin-Binding Protein Genotypes and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Results of Haemophilus influenzae.

There are several problems associated with antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of Haemophilus influenzae. β-Lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae (BLNAR) isolates with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ampicillin (ABPC) <4 mg/l will be classified as susceptible according to the MIC breakpoint of the CLSI M100 criteria, in spite of harboring penicillin-binding protein (PBP) mutations that cause ABPC resistance. A total of 103 isolates were collected from clinical materials for analysis. The genotypes of the PBP mutations were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction. The WalkAway 96 Plus (WALKAWAY), dry plate Eiken (DP-EIKEN), and RAISUS S4 systems (RAISUS) were used for AST. HTM broth was used as the culture medium for WALKAWAY, Mueller‒Hinton broth with 5% lysed horse blood for DP-EIKEN, and HTM with 5% horse serum for RAISUS. The MIC concordance rates of ABPC for g-BLNAR, for RAISUS vs. DP-EIKEN, RAISUS vs. WALKAWAY, and DP-EIKEN vs. WALKAWAY were 96.1, 86.4, and 85.4%, respectively. WALKAWAY had a low correlation with the other two systems. Moreover, concordance rates of ABPC MIC ≥4 mg/l, which is considered as resistant, of 69 g-BLNAR isolates for the RAISUS, DP-EIKEN, and WALKAWAY systems were 68.1, 58.0, and 37.7%, respectively. Therefore, in Japan, where the BLNAR strain is isolated at a high frequency, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of the measuring systems to appropriately interpret the test results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Japanese Case of COVID-19 Caused by Omicron Strain with Y453F Substitution. [Evaluation of Methicillin Resistance Determination Time for MRSA Using Fully Automated Rapid Identification Susceptibility testing system RAISAS S4]. [Evaluation of the Clinical Validity of the Clostridioides difficile Nucleic Acid Detection Kit "Smart Gene® CD ToxinB"]. [Relationship between Serotypes and Biotypes of Yersinia enterocolitica and the Names of Identified Bacteria in the Microbial Identification and Susceptibility Testing Devices]. Comparison of Microorganism Detection, Time to Positivity, and Time-Dependent Shift in Viable Bacterial Count from VersaTREK and BacT/ALERT 3D Blood Culture Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1