精神需求的协调评估:在缓和治疗中使用的叙事和心理测量评估工具的交叉行走。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-28 DOI:10.1080/08854726.2021.1904653
Kathleen R Perry, Heather A King, Ryan Parker, Karen E Steinhauser
{"title":"精神需求的协调评估:在缓和治疗中使用的叙事和心理测量评估工具的交叉行走。","authors":"Kathleen R Perry,&nbsp;Heather A King,&nbsp;Ryan Parker,&nbsp;Karen E Steinhauser","doi":"10.1080/08854726.2021.1904653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Addressing spiritual needs of patients in healthcare settings improves patient experiences and clinical outcomes; however, non-chaplain providers typically assess spiritual needs differently (quantitative psychometric) than healthcare chaplains (long form narrative) and thus there is little shared language or cross-disciplinary evaluation frameworks across disciplines. This discrepancy impedes the provision of both team-based and patient-centered care. This paper used scoping review methodology to illustrate the overlap between narrative and psychometric assessment tools, comparing four narrative tools against eight psychometric tools. The SpNQ-120 and Brief RCOPE demonstrated consistent domain coverage across the four chaplain narrative tools. This work provides preliminary resources to aid clinicians and researchers in choosing an appropriate tool. Additionally, for those who do not work closely with chaplains, it provides a sense of what domains chaplains prioritize, from their professional and lived experience, in assessing the spiritual life of the patient. This improves interdisciplinary communication, and therefore, patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08854726.2021.1904653","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coordinating assessment of spiritual needs: a cross-walk of narrative and psychometric assessment tools used in palliative care.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen R Perry,&nbsp;Heather A King,&nbsp;Ryan Parker,&nbsp;Karen E Steinhauser\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08854726.2021.1904653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Addressing spiritual needs of patients in healthcare settings improves patient experiences and clinical outcomes; however, non-chaplain providers typically assess spiritual needs differently (quantitative psychometric) than healthcare chaplains (long form narrative) and thus there is little shared language or cross-disciplinary evaluation frameworks across disciplines. This discrepancy impedes the provision of both team-based and patient-centered care. This paper used scoping review methodology to illustrate the overlap between narrative and psychometric assessment tools, comparing four narrative tools against eight psychometric tools. The SpNQ-120 and Brief RCOPE demonstrated consistent domain coverage across the four chaplain narrative tools. This work provides preliminary resources to aid clinicians and researchers in choosing an appropriate tool. Additionally, for those who do not work closely with chaplains, it provides a sense of what domains chaplains prioritize, from their professional and lived experience, in assessing the spiritual life of the patient. This improves interdisciplinary communication, and therefore, patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08854726.2021.1904653\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2021.1904653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854726.2021.1904653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在医疗保健环境中解决患者的精神需求可改善患者体验和临床结果;然而,非牧师通常评估精神需求的方式(定量心理测量)与医疗保健牧师(长篇叙述)不同,因此几乎没有共同的语言或跨学科的评估框架。这种差异阻碍了以团队为基础和以患者为中心的护理的提供。本文使用范围审查方法来说明叙事和心理测量评估工具之间的重叠,比较了四种叙事工具和八种心理测量工具。SpNQ-120和Brief RCOPE在四种牧师叙述工具中展示了一致的领域覆盖。这项工作为帮助临床医生和研究人员选择合适的工具提供了初步的资源。此外,对于那些与牧师没有密切合作的人,它提供了牧师在评估病人的精神生活时,根据他们的专业和生活经验,优先考虑哪些领域的感觉。这改善了跨学科的交流,从而改善了病人的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coordinating assessment of spiritual needs: a cross-walk of narrative and psychometric assessment tools used in palliative care.

Addressing spiritual needs of patients in healthcare settings improves patient experiences and clinical outcomes; however, non-chaplain providers typically assess spiritual needs differently (quantitative psychometric) than healthcare chaplains (long form narrative) and thus there is little shared language or cross-disciplinary evaluation frameworks across disciplines. This discrepancy impedes the provision of both team-based and patient-centered care. This paper used scoping review methodology to illustrate the overlap between narrative and psychometric assessment tools, comparing four narrative tools against eight psychometric tools. The SpNQ-120 and Brief RCOPE demonstrated consistent domain coverage across the four chaplain narrative tools. This work provides preliminary resources to aid clinicians and researchers in choosing an appropriate tool. Additionally, for those who do not work closely with chaplains, it provides a sense of what domains chaplains prioritize, from their professional and lived experience, in assessing the spiritual life of the patient. This improves interdisciplinary communication, and therefore, patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
21.10%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy publishes peer-reviewed, scholarly articles based on original research, quality assurance/improvement studies, descriptions of programs and interventions, program/intervention evaluations, and literature reviews on topics pertinent to pastoral/spiritual care, clinical pastoral education, chaplaincy, and spirituality in relation to physical and mental health.
期刊最新文献
Addressing spiritual needs of Veterans post-incarceration: a needs assessment. Chaplain care for health care colleagues: a scoping review. Proof of concept, feasibility, and acceptability of spiritual care assessment and intervention-pediatric with caregivers of children receiving home mechanical ventilation. Chaplaincy and outpatient cancer care in a faith-based health system: lessons learned when imbedding two full time chaplain positions in a cancer institute with a faith-based heritage. Pediatric chaplains iterative process to address religious & spiritual struggle: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1