应用人工智能/机器视觉和学习开发预测前列腺癌肿瘤侵袭性的活单细胞表型生物标志物测试。

Reviews in urology Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Jonathan S Varsanik, Michael S Manak, Matthew J Whitfield, Brad J Hogan, Wendell R Su, C J Jiang, Grannum R Sant, David M Albala, Ashok C Chander
{"title":"应用人工智能/机器视觉和学习开发预测前列腺癌肿瘤侵袭性的活单细胞表型生物标志物测试。","authors":"Jonathan S Varsanik,&nbsp;Michael S Manak,&nbsp;Matthew J Whitfield,&nbsp;Brad J Hogan,&nbsp;Wendell R Su,&nbsp;C J Jiang,&nbsp;Grannum R Sant,&nbsp;David M Albala,&nbsp;Ashok C Chander","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To <b>assess</b> the usefulness and applications of machine vision (MV) and machine learning (ML) techniques that have been used to develop a single cell-based phenotypic (live and fixed biomarkers) platform that correlates with tumor biological aggressiveness and risk stratification, 100 fresh prostate samples were acquired, and areas of prostate cancer were determined by post-surgery pathology reports logged by an independent pathologist. The prostate samples were dissociated into single-cell suspensions in the presence of an extracellular matrix formulation. These samples were analyzed via live-cell microscopy. Dynamic and fixed phenotypic biomarkers per cell were quantified using objective MV software and ML algorithms. The predictive nature of the ML algorithms was developed in two stages. First, random forest (RF) algorithms were developed using 70% of the samples. The developed algorithms were then tested for their predictive performance using the blinded test dataset that contained 30% of the samples in the second stage. Based on the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis, thresholds were set to maximize both sensitivity and specificity. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of the assay by comparing the algorithm-generated predictions with adverse pathologic features in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. Using MV and ML algorithms, the biomarkers predictive of adverse pathology at RP were ranked and a prostate cancer patient risk stratification test was developed that distinguishes patients based on surgical adverse pathology features. The ability to identify and track large numbers of individual cells over the length of the microscopy experimental monitoring cycles, in an automated way, created a large biomarker dataset of primary biomarkers. This biomarker dataset was then interrogated with ML algorithms used to correlate with post-surgical adverse pathology findings. Algorithms were generated that predicted adverse pathology with >0.85 sensitivity and specificity and an AUC (area under the curve) of >0.85. Phenotypic biomarkers provide cellular and molecular details that are informative for predicting post-surgical adverse pathologies when considering tumor biopsy samples. Artificial intelligence ML-based approaches for cancer risk stratification are emerging as important and powerful tools to compliment current measures of risk stratification. These techniques have capabilities to address tumor heterogeneity and the molecular complexity of prostate cancer. Specifically, the phenotypic test is a novel example of leveraging biomarkers and advances in MV and ML for developing a powerful prognostic and risk-stratification tool for prostate cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21185,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in urology","volume":"22 4","pages":"159-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058915/pdf/RiU022004_0159.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Vision & Learning for the Development of a Live Single-cell Phenotypic Biomarker Test to Predict Prostate Cancer Tumor Aggressiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan S Varsanik,&nbsp;Michael S Manak,&nbsp;Matthew J Whitfield,&nbsp;Brad J Hogan,&nbsp;Wendell R Su,&nbsp;C J Jiang,&nbsp;Grannum R Sant,&nbsp;David M Albala,&nbsp;Ashok C Chander\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To <b>assess</b> the usefulness and applications of machine vision (MV) and machine learning (ML) techniques that have been used to develop a single cell-based phenotypic (live and fixed biomarkers) platform that correlates with tumor biological aggressiveness and risk stratification, 100 fresh prostate samples were acquired, and areas of prostate cancer were determined by post-surgery pathology reports logged by an independent pathologist. The prostate samples were dissociated into single-cell suspensions in the presence of an extracellular matrix formulation. These samples were analyzed via live-cell microscopy. Dynamic and fixed phenotypic biomarkers per cell were quantified using objective MV software and ML algorithms. The predictive nature of the ML algorithms was developed in two stages. First, random forest (RF) algorithms were developed using 70% of the samples. The developed algorithms were then tested for their predictive performance using the blinded test dataset that contained 30% of the samples in the second stage. Based on the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis, thresholds were set to maximize both sensitivity and specificity. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of the assay by comparing the algorithm-generated predictions with adverse pathologic features in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. Using MV and ML algorithms, the biomarkers predictive of adverse pathology at RP were ranked and a prostate cancer patient risk stratification test was developed that distinguishes patients based on surgical adverse pathology features. The ability to identify and track large numbers of individual cells over the length of the microscopy experimental monitoring cycles, in an automated way, created a large biomarker dataset of primary biomarkers. This biomarker dataset was then interrogated with ML algorithms used to correlate with post-surgical adverse pathology findings. Algorithms were generated that predicted adverse pathology with >0.85 sensitivity and specificity and an AUC (area under the curve) of >0.85. Phenotypic biomarkers provide cellular and molecular details that are informative for predicting post-surgical adverse pathologies when considering tumor biopsy samples. Artificial intelligence ML-based approaches for cancer risk stratification are emerging as important and powerful tools to compliment current measures of risk stratification. These techniques have capabilities to address tumor heterogeneity and the molecular complexity of prostate cancer. Specifically, the phenotypic test is a novel example of leveraging biomarkers and advances in MV and ML for developing a powerful prognostic and risk-stratification tool for prostate cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in urology\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"159-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8058915/pdf/RiU022004_0159.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估机器视觉(MV)和机器学习(ML)技术的有用性和应用,这些技术已被用于开发与肿瘤生物侵袭性和风险分层相关的单细胞表型(活的和固定的生物标志物)平台,获得了100个新鲜的前列腺样本,并通过独立病理学家记录的术后病理报告确定前列腺癌的区域。前列腺样品在细胞外基质制剂的存在下解离成单细胞悬浮液。这些样品通过活细胞显微镜进行分析。使用客观MV软件和ML算法对每个细胞的动态和固定表型生物标志物进行量化。机器学习算法的预测特性分为两个阶段。首先,使用70%的样本开发随机森林(RF)算法。然后使用第二阶段包含30%样本的盲法测试数据集测试开发的算法的预测性能。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,设定阈值,使敏感性和特异性最大化。我们通过将算法生成的预测与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)标本中的不良病理特征进行比较,确定了该检测的敏感性和特异性。使用MV和ML算法,预测RP不良病理的生物标志物进行排名,并开发了前列腺癌患者风险分层测试,根据手术不良病理特征区分患者。在显微镜实验监测周期内,以自动化的方式识别和跟踪大量单个细胞的能力,创建了一个主要生物标志物的大型生物标志物数据集。然后使用ML算法查询该生物标志物数据集,该算法用于与术后不良病理结果相关联。生成的算法预测不良病理的敏感性和特异性均>0.85,曲线下面积(AUC) >0.85。当考虑肿瘤活检样本时,表型生物标志物提供细胞和分子细节,为预测术后不良病理提供信息。基于人工智能机器学习的癌症风险分层方法正在成为补充当前风险分层措施的重要而有力的工具。这些技术有能力解决肿瘤的异质性和前列腺癌的分子复杂性。具体来说,表型测试是利用生物标志物和MV和ML的进展为前列腺癌患者开发强大的预后和风险分层工具的一个新例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Artificial Intelligence/Machine Vision & Learning for the Development of a Live Single-cell Phenotypic Biomarker Test to Predict Prostate Cancer Tumor Aggressiveness.

To assess the usefulness and applications of machine vision (MV) and machine learning (ML) techniques that have been used to develop a single cell-based phenotypic (live and fixed biomarkers) platform that correlates with tumor biological aggressiveness and risk stratification, 100 fresh prostate samples were acquired, and areas of prostate cancer were determined by post-surgery pathology reports logged by an independent pathologist. The prostate samples were dissociated into single-cell suspensions in the presence of an extracellular matrix formulation. These samples were analyzed via live-cell microscopy. Dynamic and fixed phenotypic biomarkers per cell were quantified using objective MV software and ML algorithms. The predictive nature of the ML algorithms was developed in two stages. First, random forest (RF) algorithms were developed using 70% of the samples. The developed algorithms were then tested for their predictive performance using the blinded test dataset that contained 30% of the samples in the second stage. Based on the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis, thresholds were set to maximize both sensitivity and specificity. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of the assay by comparing the algorithm-generated predictions with adverse pathologic features in the radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. Using MV and ML algorithms, the biomarkers predictive of adverse pathology at RP were ranked and a prostate cancer patient risk stratification test was developed that distinguishes patients based on surgical adverse pathology features. The ability to identify and track large numbers of individual cells over the length of the microscopy experimental monitoring cycles, in an automated way, created a large biomarker dataset of primary biomarkers. This biomarker dataset was then interrogated with ML algorithms used to correlate with post-surgical adverse pathology findings. Algorithms were generated that predicted adverse pathology with >0.85 sensitivity and specificity and an AUC (area under the curve) of >0.85. Phenotypic biomarkers provide cellular and molecular details that are informative for predicting post-surgical adverse pathologies when considering tumor biopsy samples. Artificial intelligence ML-based approaches for cancer risk stratification are emerging as important and powerful tools to compliment current measures of risk stratification. These techniques have capabilities to address tumor heterogeneity and the molecular complexity of prostate cancer. Specifically, the phenotypic test is a novel example of leveraging biomarkers and advances in MV and ML for developing a powerful prognostic and risk-stratification tool for prostate cancer patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Obesity and Its Impact on Kidney Stone Formation. Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Stage IB Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor: NYU Case of the Month, April 2020. Management of Low-grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An Unmet Need. Active Surveillance for Small Renal Masses. Benchmarking-We've Come a Long Way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1