对互联网上基恩伯克病信息来源和内容的评估。

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-07 DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1701150
Brian M Katt, Ludovico Lucenti, Nailah F Mubin, Michael Nakashian, Daniel Fletcher, Daren Aita, Pedro K Beredjiklian
{"title":"对互联网上基恩伯克病信息来源和内容的评估。","authors":"Brian M Katt, Ludovico Lucenti, Nailah F Mubin, Michael Nakashian, Daniel Fletcher, Daren Aita, Pedro K Beredjiklian","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1701150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The use of the internet for health-related information continues to increase. Because of its decentralized structure, information contained within the World Wide Web is not regulated. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the type and quality of information on the internet regarding Kienböck's disease. We hypothesized that the information available on the World Wide Web would be of good informational value. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  The search phrase \"Kienböck's disease\" was entered into the five most commonly used internet search engines. The top 49 nonsponsored Web sites identified by each search engine were collected. Each unique Web site was evaluated for authorship and content, and an informational score ranging from 0 to 100 points was assigned. Each site was reviewed by two fellowship-trained hand surgeons. <b>Results</b>  The informational mean score for the sites was 45.5 out of a maximum of 100 points. Thirty-one (63%) of the Web sites evaluated were authored by an academic institution or a physician. Twelve (24%) of the sites were commercial sites or sold commercial products. The remaining 6 Web sites (12%) were noninformational, provided unconventional information, or had lay authorship. The average informational score on the academic or physician authored Web sites was 54 out of 100 points, compared with 38 out of 100 for the remainder of the sites. This difference was statistically significant. <b>Conclusion</b>  While the majority of the Web sites evaluated were authored by academic institutions or physicians, the informational value contained within is of limited completeness. More than one quarter of the Web sites were commercial in nature. There remains significant room for improvement in the completeness of information available for common hand conditions in the internet.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"13 2","pages":"65-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/32/10-1055-s-0040-1701150.PMC8041493.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of the Source and Content of Kienböck's Disease Information on the Internet.\",\"authors\":\"Brian M Katt, Ludovico Lucenti, Nailah F Mubin, Michael Nakashian, Daniel Fletcher, Daren Aita, Pedro K Beredjiklian\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0040-1701150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  The use of the internet for health-related information continues to increase. Because of its decentralized structure, information contained within the World Wide Web is not regulated. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the type and quality of information on the internet regarding Kienböck's disease. We hypothesized that the information available on the World Wide Web would be of good informational value. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  The search phrase \\\"Kienböck's disease\\\" was entered into the five most commonly used internet search engines. The top 49 nonsponsored Web sites identified by each search engine were collected. Each unique Web site was evaluated for authorship and content, and an informational score ranging from 0 to 100 points was assigned. Each site was reviewed by two fellowship-trained hand surgeons. <b>Results</b>  The informational mean score for the sites was 45.5 out of a maximum of 100 points. Thirty-one (63%) of the Web sites evaluated were authored by an academic institution or a physician. Twelve (24%) of the sites were commercial sites or sold commercial products. The remaining 6 Web sites (12%) were noninformational, provided unconventional information, or had lay authorship. The average informational score on the academic or physician authored Web sites was 54 out of 100 points, compared with 38 out of 100 for the remainder of the sites. This difference was statistically significant. <b>Conclusion</b>  While the majority of the Web sites evaluated were authored by academic institutions or physicians, the informational value contained within is of limited completeness. More than one quarter of the Web sites were commercial in nature. There remains significant room for improvement in the completeness of information available for common hand conditions in the internet.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"65-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/98/32/10-1055-s-0040-1701150.PMC8041493.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/4/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 利用互联网获取健康相关信息的现象不断增多。由于其结构分散,万维网上的信息不受监管。本研究旨在评估互联网上有关基恩博克病的信息类型和质量。我们假设万维网上的信息具有很高的信息价值。材料与方法 在五个最常用的互联网搜索引擎中输入搜索短语 "基恩博克病"。收集了每个搜索引擎搜索到的前 49 个非赞助网站。对每个网站的作者和内容进行评估,并给出 0 到 100 分的信息分。每个网站都由两名经过研究培训的手外科医生进行审核。结果 网站信息平均分为 45.5 分(满分 100 分)。在接受评估的网站中,有 31 个(63%)由学术机构或医生撰写。12个网站(24%)是商业网站或销售商业产品的网站。其余 6 个网站(12%)为非信息网站,提供非传统信息,或由非专业人士撰写。学术网站或由医生撰写的网站的平均信息得分是 54 分(满分 100 分),而其余网站的平均得分是 38 分(满分 100 分)。这一差异具有统计学意义。结论 虽然大多数被评估的网站都是由学术机构或医生撰写的,但其中包含的信息价值的完整性有限。超过四分之一的网站具有商业性质。互联网上常见手部疾病信息的完整性仍有很大的改进空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Evaluation of the Source and Content of Kienböck's Disease Information on the Internet.

Introduction  The use of the internet for health-related information continues to increase. Because of its decentralized structure, information contained within the World Wide Web is not regulated. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the type and quality of information on the internet regarding Kienböck's disease. We hypothesized that the information available on the World Wide Web would be of good informational value. Materials and Methods  The search phrase "Kienböck's disease" was entered into the five most commonly used internet search engines. The top 49 nonsponsored Web sites identified by each search engine were collected. Each unique Web site was evaluated for authorship and content, and an informational score ranging from 0 to 100 points was assigned. Each site was reviewed by two fellowship-trained hand surgeons. Results  The informational mean score for the sites was 45.5 out of a maximum of 100 points. Thirty-one (63%) of the Web sites evaluated were authored by an academic institution or a physician. Twelve (24%) of the sites were commercial sites or sold commercial products. The remaining 6 Web sites (12%) were noninformational, provided unconventional information, or had lay authorship. The average informational score on the academic or physician authored Web sites was 54 out of 100 points, compared with 38 out of 100 for the remainder of the sites. This difference was statistically significant. Conclusion  While the majority of the Web sites evaluated were authored by academic institutions or physicians, the informational value contained within is of limited completeness. More than one quarter of the Web sites were commercial in nature. There remains significant room for improvement in the completeness of information available for common hand conditions in the internet.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The modified placenta model for microsurgery training: Recommended methods for comprehensive microsurgery experience. Ulnar shaft diameter as it relates to plate osteosynthesis: A cadaveric study. A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery. Diagnostic and management strategies for pseudoaneurysm of the ulnar artery: A scoping review. Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1