膝关节多韧带重建术后康复:系统综述。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1097/JSA.0000000000000308
Laura E Keeling, Sarah N Powell, Evan Purvis, Thomas J Willauer, William F Postma
{"title":"膝关节多韧带重建术后康复:系统综述。","authors":"Laura E Keeling,&nbsp;Sarah N Powell,&nbsp;Evan Purvis,&nbsp;Thomas J Willauer,&nbsp;William F Postma","doi":"10.1097/JSA.0000000000000308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) are rare, and heterogeneous in presentation and treatment options. Consequently, optimal postoperative rehabilitation of MLKI remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize the latest evidence for postoperative rehabilitation protocols following multiligamentous knee reconstruction (MLKR).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A multidatabase search was conducted with the aid of a health sciences librarian. Blinded reviewers conducted multiple screenings of studies evaluating postoperative rehabilitation protocols following MLKR. All included studies were then graded based on level of evidence, and data concerning patient demographics and rehabilitation protocols were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MLKR rehabilitation protocols differ widely in terms of weightbearing, bracing, initiation, and types of physical therapy, yet several established protocols were referenced frequently throughout the literature. Such protocols resulted in good outcomes, with patients returning to running in 6 to 12 months and returning to sport in 8 to 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rare nature of MLKI hinders the ability to create a standardized rehabilitation protocol. However, early postoperative physical therapy and range of motion consistently lead to improved outcomes. Randomized studies are needed to determine optimal postoperative rehabilitation following MLKR.</p>","PeriodicalId":49481,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Rehabilitation of Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Laura E Keeling,&nbsp;Sarah N Powell,&nbsp;Evan Purvis,&nbsp;Thomas J Willauer,&nbsp;William F Postma\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JSA.0000000000000308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) are rare, and heterogeneous in presentation and treatment options. Consequently, optimal postoperative rehabilitation of MLKI remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize the latest evidence for postoperative rehabilitation protocols following multiligamentous knee reconstruction (MLKR).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A multidatabase search was conducted with the aid of a health sciences librarian. Blinded reviewers conducted multiple screenings of studies evaluating postoperative rehabilitation protocols following MLKR. All included studies were then graded based on level of evidence, and data concerning patient demographics and rehabilitation protocols were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MLKR rehabilitation protocols differ widely in terms of weightbearing, bracing, initiation, and types of physical therapy, yet several established protocols were referenced frequently throughout the literature. Such protocols resulted in good outcomes, with patients returning to running in 6 to 12 months and returning to sport in 8 to 12 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The rare nature of MLKI hinders the ability to create a standardized rehabilitation protocol. However, early postoperative physical therapy and range of motion consistently lead to improved outcomes. Randomized studies are needed to determine optimal postoperative rehabilitation following MLKR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0000000000000308\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0000000000000308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:多韧带膝关节损伤(MLKIs)是罕见的,并且在表现和治疗方案上具有异质性。因此,最佳的MLKI术后康复仍不清楚。目的:总结多韧带膝关节重建术(MLKR)术后康复方案的最新证据。患者和方法:在健康科学图书管理员的帮助下进行了多数据库检索。盲法审稿人对评估MLKR术后康复方案的研究进行了多次筛选。然后根据证据水平对所有纳入的研究进行分级,并提取有关患者人口统计学和康复方案的数据。结果:MLKR康复方案在负重、支具、起始和物理治疗类型方面差异很大,但在整个文献中经常引用一些已建立的方案。这样的方案产生了良好的结果,患者在6至12个月内恢复跑步,在8至12个月内恢复运动。结论:MLKI的罕见性质阻碍了建立标准化康复方案的能力。然而,术后早期物理治疗和活动范围持续改善预后。需要随机研究来确定MLKR术后最佳康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative Rehabilitation of Multiligament Knee Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Background: Multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) are rare, and heterogeneous in presentation and treatment options. Consequently, optimal postoperative rehabilitation of MLKI remains unclear.

Objective: To summarize the latest evidence for postoperative rehabilitation protocols following multiligamentous knee reconstruction (MLKR).

Patients and methods: A multidatabase search was conducted with the aid of a health sciences librarian. Blinded reviewers conducted multiple screenings of studies evaluating postoperative rehabilitation protocols following MLKR. All included studies were then graded based on level of evidence, and data concerning patient demographics and rehabilitation protocols were extracted.

Results: MLKR rehabilitation protocols differ widely in terms of weightbearing, bracing, initiation, and types of physical therapy, yet several established protocols were referenced frequently throughout the literature. Such protocols resulted in good outcomes, with patients returning to running in 6 to 12 months and returning to sport in 8 to 12 months.

Conclusion: The rare nature of MLKI hinders the ability to create a standardized rehabilitation protocol. However, early postoperative physical therapy and range of motion consistently lead to improved outcomes. Randomized studies are needed to determine optimal postoperative rehabilitation following MLKR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review helps physicians digest the large volume of clinical literature in sports medicine and arthroscopy, identify the most important new developments, and apply new information effectively in clinical practice. Each issue is guest-edited by an acknowledged expert and focuses on a single topic or controversy. The Guest Editor invites the leading specialists on the topic to write review articles that highlight the most important advances. This unique format makes the journal more in-depth, authoritative, and practical than most publications in this field. The journal also includes dozens of full-color and black-and-white arthroscopic images and illustrations.
期刊最新文献
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in Soccer Players. Concussions in Soccer. Femoroacetabular Impingement and Groin Injuries Among Soccer Players. Guide to Muscular Injuries and Common Ligamentous Injuries Among Soccer Players. Meniscus Injuries in Soccer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1