海因茨·科胡特的《自我观念》

Q4 Medicine Psychoanalytic Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.197
Charles B Strozier, Konstantine Pinteris, Kathleen Kelley, Deborah Mart, David L Strug
{"title":"海因茨·科胡特的《自我观念》","authors":"Charles B Strozier,&nbsp;Konstantine Pinteris,&nbsp;Kathleen Kelley,&nbsp;Deborah Mart,&nbsp;David L Strug","doi":"10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors explore Heinz Kohut's ideas of self, including its nuclear and virtual forms, in the critical period from the late 1960s to about 1975. Kohut's creative process, it is argued, has not been fully appreciated. The authors establish the baseline of Kohut's ideas about the self in his first book, <i>The Analysis of the Self</i> in 1971. His ideas then evolved significantly in the next few years, as he came to define the self as the center of psychological experience and then to consider what he came to call the nuclear self and the virtual self as extensions of his core ideas about the self-selfobject system. The authors trace the specific sequence of conceptual steps that Kohut took in his reexamination of what he meant by self. Kohut's thinking in this area proceeded unevenly and not always chronologically. His pathbreaking work in the early 1970s on fragmentation, on the cohesion and continuity of the self, and on the mutable nature of the nuclear self and the virtual self represents a seminal development in the understanding of these psychoanalytic concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":39855,"journal":{"name":"Psychoanalytic Review","volume":"108 2","pages":"197-213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heinz Kohut's Ideas of Self.\",\"authors\":\"Charles B Strozier,&nbsp;Konstantine Pinteris,&nbsp;Kathleen Kelley,&nbsp;Deborah Mart,&nbsp;David L Strug\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The authors explore Heinz Kohut's ideas of self, including its nuclear and virtual forms, in the critical period from the late 1960s to about 1975. Kohut's creative process, it is argued, has not been fully appreciated. The authors establish the baseline of Kohut's ideas about the self in his first book, <i>The Analysis of the Self</i> in 1971. His ideas then evolved significantly in the next few years, as he came to define the self as the center of psychological experience and then to consider what he came to call the nuclear self and the virtual self as extensions of his core ideas about the self-selfobject system. The authors trace the specific sequence of conceptual steps that Kohut took in his reexamination of what he meant by self. Kohut's thinking in this area proceeded unevenly and not always chronologically. His pathbreaking work in the early 1970s on fragmentation, on the cohesion and continuity of the self, and on the mutable nature of the nuclear self and the virtual self represents a seminal development in the understanding of these psychoanalytic concepts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychoanalytic Review\",\"volume\":\"108 2\",\"pages\":\"197-213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychoanalytic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoanalytic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/prev.2021.108.2.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作者探讨了海因茨·科胡特在20世纪60年代末至1975年左右的关键时期对自我的看法,包括其核心形式和虚拟形式。有人认为,科胡特的创作过程并没有得到充分的重视。两位作者在科胡特1971年出版的第一本书《自我分析》(The Analysis of The self)中为他关于自我的观点奠定了基础。在接下来的几年里,他的思想有了显著的发展,他开始将自我定义为心理体验的中心,然后将他所谓的核心自我和虚拟自我视为他关于自我-自我-客体系统的核心思想的延伸。作者追溯了科胡特在重新审视他所说的“自我”时所采取的一系列概念性步骤。科胡特在这方面的思考并不总是按时间顺序进行的。他在20世纪70年代早期的开创性工作,关于分裂,关于自我的凝聚力和连续性,关于核心自我和虚拟自我的易变性,代表了对这些精神分析概念理解的开创性发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heinz Kohut's Ideas of Self.

The authors explore Heinz Kohut's ideas of self, including its nuclear and virtual forms, in the critical period from the late 1960s to about 1975. Kohut's creative process, it is argued, has not been fully appreciated. The authors establish the baseline of Kohut's ideas about the self in his first book, The Analysis of the Self in 1971. His ideas then evolved significantly in the next few years, as he came to define the self as the center of psychological experience and then to consider what he came to call the nuclear self and the virtual self as extensions of his core ideas about the self-selfobject system. The authors trace the specific sequence of conceptual steps that Kohut took in his reexamination of what he meant by self. Kohut's thinking in this area proceeded unevenly and not always chronologically. His pathbreaking work in the early 1970s on fragmentation, on the cohesion and continuity of the self, and on the mutable nature of the nuclear self and the virtual self represents a seminal development in the understanding of these psychoanalytic concepts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychoanalytic Review
Psychoanalytic Review Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: In six issues per year, The Psychoanalytic Review publishes peer-reviewed articles on a wide range of theoretical, clinical and cultural topics, including interdisciplinary studies, which help advance psychoanalytic theory and understanding of therapeutic process. Special Issues, organized by guest editors with recognized knowledge in a specific area within the field of psychoanalysis or intersecting with it, are an important feature of the Review. The journal also publishes reviews of books and films of interest to psychoanalysis.
期刊最新文献
Conversation With Mark Solms. A Note on a Genre. An Analyst's Hallucination as a Manifestation of Osmotic Communication. Finding Integration in a Splintered World: Contemporary Psychoanalytic Thoughts on Clinical Work. From Anxiety to Aesthetics: "Rank Horror: An International Symposium".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1