患者对RA数字移动健康应用的看法。

IF 1.7 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2021-04-23 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OARRR.S296541
Simran Chahal, Norma Biln, Bruce Clarke
{"title":"患者对RA数字移动健康应用的看法。","authors":"Simran Chahal,&nbsp;Norma Biln,&nbsp;Bruce Clarke","doi":"10.2147/OARRR.S296541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that patients are increasingly willing to use digital mobile health applications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA apps). The development and diffusion of RA apps open the possibility of improved management of the disease and better physician-patient interactions. However, adoption rates among apps have been lower than hoped, and research shows that many available RA apps lack key features. There is little research exploring patient preferences for RA apps or patients' habits and preferences for app payment, which are likely key factors affecting adoption of this technology. This study seeks to understand characteristics of RA patients who have adopted RA apps, their preferences for app features, and their willingness to pay for, and experiences with app payment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study come from a 33-question online survey of patients with RA in Canada and the United States (N=30). Information on demographics, diagnosis and management of RA, current use and desired features of RA apps, and prior experience with and willingness to pay for an app was collected. Descriptive statistics are reported, and bivariate analyses (chi-square, point-biserial correlation, and ANOVA) were performed to understand relationships between variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents showed a clear preference for certain app features, namely symptom tracking, scheduling appointments, and reminders. Physician recommendation for an app and patient tracking of symptoms with an app were significantly related to patient adoption of an RA app. Years since diagnosis with RA, physician recommendation for an RA app, and current use of a non-RA health tracking app were significantly related to patients' willingness to pay a subscription for an RA app.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RA patients appear to prefer task support features in an RA app, notably symptom tracking, appointment scheduling, and reminders, over other features such as those related to dialogue support and social support. The choice of whether an RA app will be free or based on a subscription, pay-per-service, or one-time purchase model may also play a role in eventual adoption. Similarly, physician recommendation appears to influence patients' decision to use an RA app as well as their willingness to pay a subscription for an app.</p>","PeriodicalId":45545,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/0f/oarrr-13-63.PMC8080430.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Perspectives on a Digital Mobile Health Application for RA.\",\"authors\":\"Simran Chahal,&nbsp;Norma Biln,&nbsp;Bruce Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OARRR.S296541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that patients are increasingly willing to use digital mobile health applications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA apps). The development and diffusion of RA apps open the possibility of improved management of the disease and better physician-patient interactions. However, adoption rates among apps have been lower than hoped, and research shows that many available RA apps lack key features. There is little research exploring patient preferences for RA apps or patients' habits and preferences for app payment, which are likely key factors affecting adoption of this technology. This study seeks to understand characteristics of RA patients who have adopted RA apps, their preferences for app features, and their willingness to pay for, and experiences with app payment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this study come from a 33-question online survey of patients with RA in Canada and the United States (N=30). Information on demographics, diagnosis and management of RA, current use and desired features of RA apps, and prior experience with and willingness to pay for an app was collected. Descriptive statistics are reported, and bivariate analyses (chi-square, point-biserial correlation, and ANOVA) were performed to understand relationships between variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents showed a clear preference for certain app features, namely symptom tracking, scheduling appointments, and reminders. Physician recommendation for an app and patient tracking of symptoms with an app were significantly related to patient adoption of an RA app. Years since diagnosis with RA, physician recommendation for an RA app, and current use of a non-RA health tracking app were significantly related to patients' willingness to pay a subscription for an RA app.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RA patients appear to prefer task support features in an RA app, notably symptom tracking, appointment scheduling, and reminders, over other features such as those related to dialogue support and social support. The choice of whether an RA app will be free or based on a subscription, pay-per-service, or one-time purchase model may also play a role in eventual adoption. Similarly, physician recommendation appears to influence patients' decision to use an RA app as well as their willingness to pay a subscription for an app.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"63-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/0f/oarrr-13-63.PMC8080430.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S296541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S296541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:新出现的证据表明,患者越来越愿意使用类风湿关节炎的数字移动健康应用程序(RA应用程序)。类风湿性关节炎应用程序的开发和推广为改善疾病管理和更好的医患互动提供了可能。然而,应用程序的采用率低于预期,研究表明,许多可用的RA应用程序缺乏关键功能。很少有研究探讨患者对RA应用程序的偏好或患者对应用程序支付的习惯和偏好,这些可能是影响该技术采用的关键因素。本研究旨在了解使用RA应用程序的RA患者的特征,他们对应用程序功能的偏好,以及他们对应用程序支付的意愿和体验。方法:本研究的数据来自加拿大和美国一项包含33个问题的RA患者在线调查(N=30)。收集了RA的人口统计、诊断和管理、RA应用程序的当前使用和期望功能、之前使用应用程序的经验和付费意愿等信息。报告了描述性统计数据,并进行了双变量分析(卡方、点双列相关和方差分析)以了解变量之间的关系。结果:受访者对某些应用程序功能表现出明显的偏好,即症状跟踪、预约安排和提醒。医生推荐的应用程序和患者使用应用程序跟踪症状与患者采用RA应用程序显着相关。自诊断为RA的年份,医生推荐的RA应用程序和当前使用的非RA健康跟踪应用程序与患者付费订阅RA应用程序的意愿显着相关。RA患者似乎更喜欢RA应用程序中的任务支持功能,特别是症状跟踪,预约安排和提醒,而不是其他功能,如与对话支持和社会支持相关的功能。RA应用是免费的,还是基于订阅、按服务付费或一次性购买模式的选择,也可能在最终的采用中发挥作用。同样,医生的建议似乎会影响患者使用RA应用程序的决定,以及他们为应用程序付费的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient Perspectives on a Digital Mobile Health Application for RA.

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that patients are increasingly willing to use digital mobile health applications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA apps). The development and diffusion of RA apps open the possibility of improved management of the disease and better physician-patient interactions. However, adoption rates among apps have been lower than hoped, and research shows that many available RA apps lack key features. There is little research exploring patient preferences for RA apps or patients' habits and preferences for app payment, which are likely key factors affecting adoption of this technology. This study seeks to understand characteristics of RA patients who have adopted RA apps, their preferences for app features, and their willingness to pay for, and experiences with app payment.

Methods: Data for this study come from a 33-question online survey of patients with RA in Canada and the United States (N=30). Information on demographics, diagnosis and management of RA, current use and desired features of RA apps, and prior experience with and willingness to pay for an app was collected. Descriptive statistics are reported, and bivariate analyses (chi-square, point-biserial correlation, and ANOVA) were performed to understand relationships between variables.

Results: Respondents showed a clear preference for certain app features, namely symptom tracking, scheduling appointments, and reminders. Physician recommendation for an app and patient tracking of symptoms with an app were significantly related to patient adoption of an RA app. Years since diagnosis with RA, physician recommendation for an RA app, and current use of a non-RA health tracking app were significantly related to patients' willingness to pay a subscription for an RA app.

Conclusion: RA patients appear to prefer task support features in an RA app, notably symptom tracking, appointment scheduling, and reminders, over other features such as those related to dialogue support and social support. The choice of whether an RA app will be free or based on a subscription, pay-per-service, or one-time purchase model may also play a role in eventual adoption. Similarly, physician recommendation appears to influence patients' decision to use an RA app as well as their willingness to pay a subscription for an app.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Safety of Tocilizumab on Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease. Tofacitinib Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Clinical Trials and Real-World Data Contextualization of Patients, Efficacy, and Treatment Retention. Cold Air Plasma Inhibiting Tumor-Like Biological Behavior of Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-Like Synovial Cells via G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest. JAK-Inhibitors - A Story of Success and Adverse Events. Adverse Impact of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Saudi Arabia Retrospective Multi-Center Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1