伊朗西部洛雷斯坦省皮肤利什曼病疫区两种活沙蝇捕获方法的有效性及对帕帕塔白蛉(双翅目:心蛉科)的敏感性评价

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PARASITOLOGY Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases Pub Date : 2020-12-31 eCollection Date: 2020-12-01 DOI:10.18502/jad.v14i4.5278
Yavar Rassi, Hamed Asadollahi, Mohammad Reza Abai, Mohammad Hassan Kayedi, Hassan Vatandoost
{"title":"伊朗西部洛雷斯坦省皮肤利什曼病疫区两种活沙蝇捕获方法的有效性及对帕帕塔白蛉(双翅目:心蛉科)的敏感性评价","authors":"Yavar Rassi,&nbsp;Hamed Asadollahi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Abai,&nbsp;Mohammad Hassan Kayedi,&nbsp;Hassan Vatandoost","doi":"10.18502/jad.v14i4.5278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficiency of two capture methods for providing live sandflies used for determining the susceptibility level of <i>Phlebotomus papatasi</i>, the main vector of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Lorestan Province, west of Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sand flies were collected from indoor and outdoor by hand-catch and baited traps during the peak of seasonal activity. The susceptibility level of sand flies was assessed using insecticide-impregnated papers against DDT 4%, bendiocarb 0.1%, permethrin 0.75%, deltamethrin 0.05%, and cyfluthrin 0.15%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2486 live sandflies were caught from both indoor and outdoor places. Totally 849 sand flies were caught from outdoors with a sex ratio(SR) 0.1 versus 1637 sand flies collected from indoor using the hand-catch method with SR= 0.6. The dominant species of sand flies was <i>Ph. papatasi</i> in the study area. Mortality rates of outdoor-collected sand flies were exposed to DDT 4%, deltamethrin 0.05%, permethrin 0.75%, and bendiocarb 0.1%, and mortality rate ranged from 92.0-97.9% and for indoor-collected sand flies were 87.7-96.8%. Both outdoor and indoor collected sand flies were susceptible to cyfluthrin 0.15% that caused 100% mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings, the most appropriate method for collecting the live female <i>Ph. papatasi</i> is the baited traps due to providing enough females is necessary for conducting the susceptibility tests. The finding indicated that <i>Ph. papatasi</i> was resistant to DDT, under 'verification required' status to deltamethrin, permethrin, bendiocarb, and susceptible to cyfluthrin.</p>","PeriodicalId":15095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases","volume":"14 4","pages":"408-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/67/79/JAD-14-408.PMC8053076.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of Two Capture Methods Providing Live Sand Flies and Assessment the Susceptibility Status of <i>Phlebotomus papatasi</i> (Diptera: Psychodidae) in the Foci of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Lorestan Province, Western Iran.\",\"authors\":\"Yavar Rassi,&nbsp;Hamed Asadollahi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Abai,&nbsp;Mohammad Hassan Kayedi,&nbsp;Hassan Vatandoost\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jad.v14i4.5278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficiency of two capture methods for providing live sandflies used for determining the susceptibility level of <i>Phlebotomus papatasi</i>, the main vector of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Lorestan Province, west of Iran.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sand flies were collected from indoor and outdoor by hand-catch and baited traps during the peak of seasonal activity. The susceptibility level of sand flies was assessed using insecticide-impregnated papers against DDT 4%, bendiocarb 0.1%, permethrin 0.75%, deltamethrin 0.05%, and cyfluthrin 0.15%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2486 live sandflies were caught from both indoor and outdoor places. Totally 849 sand flies were caught from outdoors with a sex ratio(SR) 0.1 versus 1637 sand flies collected from indoor using the hand-catch method with SR= 0.6. The dominant species of sand flies was <i>Ph. papatasi</i> in the study area. Mortality rates of outdoor-collected sand flies were exposed to DDT 4%, deltamethrin 0.05%, permethrin 0.75%, and bendiocarb 0.1%, and mortality rate ranged from 92.0-97.9% and for indoor-collected sand flies were 87.7-96.8%. Both outdoor and indoor collected sand flies were susceptible to cyfluthrin 0.15% that caused 100% mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings, the most appropriate method for collecting the live female <i>Ph. papatasi</i> is the baited traps due to providing enough females is necessary for conducting the susceptibility tests. The finding indicated that <i>Ph. papatasi</i> was resistant to DDT, under 'verification required' status to deltamethrin, permethrin, bendiocarb, and susceptible to cyfluthrin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"408-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/67/79/JAD-14-408.PMC8053076.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jad.v14i4.5278\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jad.v14i4.5278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评价两种捕获活白蛉的方法对伊朗西部洛雷斯坦省人畜共患皮肤利什曼病主要媒介木瓜白蛉的易感程度的影响。方法:利用季节活动高峰期,采用手捕法和诱蚊法在室内和室外采集沙蝇。采用浸渍纸对4%滴滴涕、0.1%苯虫威、0.75%氯菊酯、0.05%溴氰菊酯和0.15%氟氯菊酯进行敏感性评价。结果:室内和室外共捕获活白蛉2486只。室外法捕获白蛉849只,雌雄比为0.1;室内法捕获白蛉1637只,雌雄比为0.6。研究区沙蝇的优势种为帕帕塔沙蝇。室外采沙蝇的死亡率分别为DDT 4%、溴氰菊酯0.05%、氯菊酯0.75%、恶虫威0.1%,室内采沙蝇的死亡率为86.7% ~ 96.8%,室内采沙蝇死亡率为92.0 ~ 97.9%。室外和室内采集的沙蝇对氟氯菊酯(0.15%)均敏感,死亡率100%。结论:诱捕法是最适宜的采集方法,因为进行药敏试验需要提供足够的雌蚊。研究结果表明,papatasi对滴滴涕具有抗性,对溴氰菊酯、氯菊酯、苯虫威具有"需要验证"的抗性,对氟氯菊酯敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency of Two Capture Methods Providing Live Sand Flies and Assessment the Susceptibility Status of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) in the Foci of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Lorestan Province, Western Iran.

Background: The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficiency of two capture methods for providing live sandflies used for determining the susceptibility level of Phlebotomus papatasi, the main vector of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Lorestan Province, west of Iran.

Methods: The sand flies were collected from indoor and outdoor by hand-catch and baited traps during the peak of seasonal activity. The susceptibility level of sand flies was assessed using insecticide-impregnated papers against DDT 4%, bendiocarb 0.1%, permethrin 0.75%, deltamethrin 0.05%, and cyfluthrin 0.15%.

Results: A total of 2486 live sandflies were caught from both indoor and outdoor places. Totally 849 sand flies were caught from outdoors with a sex ratio(SR) 0.1 versus 1637 sand flies collected from indoor using the hand-catch method with SR= 0.6. The dominant species of sand flies was Ph. papatasi in the study area. Mortality rates of outdoor-collected sand flies were exposed to DDT 4%, deltamethrin 0.05%, permethrin 0.75%, and bendiocarb 0.1%, and mortality rate ranged from 92.0-97.9% and for indoor-collected sand flies were 87.7-96.8%. Both outdoor and indoor collected sand flies were susceptible to cyfluthrin 0.15% that caused 100% mortality.

Conclusion: Based on the findings, the most appropriate method for collecting the live female Ph. papatasi is the baited traps due to providing enough females is necessary for conducting the susceptibility tests. The finding indicated that Ph. papatasi was resistant to DDT, under 'verification required' status to deltamethrin, permethrin, bendiocarb, and susceptible to cyfluthrin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases
Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-PARASITOLOGY
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research paper, short communica­tion, scientific note, case report, letter to the editor, and review article in English. The scope of papers comprises all aspects of arthropod borne diseases includ­ing: ● Systematics ● Vector ecology ● Epidemiology ● Immunology ● Parasitology ● Molecular biology ● Genetics ● Population dynamics ● Toxicology ● Vector control ● Diagnosis and treatment and other related subjects.
期刊最新文献
Absence of Asymptomatic Malaria Reservoirs in an Area with a Previous History of Local Malaria Transmission: A Successful Experience in Line with the Malaria Elimination Program in Iran. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Inmates, Prison Staff and Soldiers Regarding Cimex lectularius (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) in Mazandaran Prisons. Decline of Malaria Incidence in Three Villages of Thar Desert, India: The Impact of Use of Insecticide-Treated Nets. Larvicidal Effects of Metabolites Extracted from Nocardia and Streptomyces Species against the Forth Larval Stage of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae). Metagenomics Characterization of Ixodes ricinus Intestinal Microbiota as Major Vector of Tick-Borne Diseases in Domestic Animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1