Nouman Memon, Faizan Iqbal, Syed Shahid Noor, Kazim Rahim Najjad, Muhammad Farhan Sozera, Arsalan Abro, Noman Khan
{"title":"巴基斯坦人群非肿瘤条件下单设计旋转铰链膝关节置换术的中期结果和生存率。","authors":"Nouman Memon, Faizan Iqbal, Syed Shahid Noor, Kazim Rahim Najjad, Muhammad Farhan Sozera, Arsalan Abro, Noman Khan","doi":"10.1186/s43019-021-00102-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Information regarding the use of hinged implants in non-oncological conditions is limited in our region due to a lack of adequate data collection and follow-up. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term results and risk factors affecting the survivorship of third-generation rotating hinge knee (RHK) patients in non-oncological conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 41 single, third-generation, rotating hinge prostheses in three complex primary knee procedures and 38 revision knee surgeries in between 2007 to 2014. Implant survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors influencing implant survival were identified using the log-rank test. During the study period, clinical results along with complications were assessed. Clinical outcomes were assessed by using the Knee Society Score (KSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RHK arthroplasty was used in 41 patients. Out of 41 patients, a RHK was used in three patients with a complex primary deformed knee whereas in 38 patients, a RHK was used in revision arthroplasty surgery. The cumulative implant survival rate with re-revision due to any cause was found to be 87.8% (95% CI 69.2-90.1) at 5-7 years. Prosthetic joint infection, peri-prosthetic fracture and extensor mechanism complications were the commonest mode of failure. The P value was found to be significant when comparing KSS pre-operatively and post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cumulative implant survival rate was found to be 87.8%. Prosthetic joint infection was the commonest mode of failure in patients who underwent third-generation RHK surgery for variable indications. Being a patient with a high Charlson comorbidity index is the main risk factor associated with failure of the rotating hinge implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":17886,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s43019-021-00102-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mid-term results and survival rates following a single-design rotating hinge knee arthroplasty in non-tumor conditions in a Pakistani population.\",\"authors\":\"Nouman Memon, Faizan Iqbal, Syed Shahid Noor, Kazim Rahim Najjad, Muhammad Farhan Sozera, Arsalan Abro, Noman Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43019-021-00102-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Information regarding the use of hinged implants in non-oncological conditions is limited in our region due to a lack of adequate data collection and follow-up. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term results and risk factors affecting the survivorship of third-generation rotating hinge knee (RHK) patients in non-oncological conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 41 single, third-generation, rotating hinge prostheses in three complex primary knee procedures and 38 revision knee surgeries in between 2007 to 2014. Implant survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors influencing implant survival were identified using the log-rank test. During the study period, clinical results along with complications were assessed. Clinical outcomes were assessed by using the Knee Society Score (KSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RHK arthroplasty was used in 41 patients. Out of 41 patients, a RHK was used in three patients with a complex primary deformed knee whereas in 38 patients, a RHK was used in revision arthroplasty surgery. The cumulative implant survival rate with re-revision due to any cause was found to be 87.8% (95% CI 69.2-90.1) at 5-7 years. Prosthetic joint infection, peri-prosthetic fracture and extensor mechanism complications were the commonest mode of failure. The P value was found to be significant when comparing KSS pre-operatively and post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cumulative implant survival rate was found to be 87.8%. Prosthetic joint infection was the commonest mode of failure in patients who underwent third-generation RHK surgery for variable indications. Being a patient with a high Charlson comorbidity index is the main risk factor associated with failure of the rotating hinge implant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee Surgery & Related Research\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s43019-021-00102-6\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee Surgery & Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-021-00102-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-021-00102-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:由于缺乏足够的数据收集和随访,关于在非肿瘤条件下使用铰链植入物的信息在我们地区是有限的。本研究的目的是评估非肿瘤条件下第三代旋转铰链膝关节(RHK)患者的中期结果和影响生存的危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2007年至2014年间,41例单一、第三代旋转铰链假体在3例复杂膝关节初级手术和38例膝关节翻修手术中的应用。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估种植体存活。采用log-rank检验确定影响种植体存活的因素。在研究期间,对临床结果及并发症进行评估。临床结果通过膝关节社会评分(KSS)进行评估。结果:41例患者行RHK关节置换术。在41例患者中,3例复杂的原发性膝关节畸形患者使用了RHK,而在38例患者中,RHK用于翻修关节置换术。在5-7年期间,由于任何原因重新翻修的累积种植体存活率为87.8% (95% CI 69.2-90.1)。假体关节感染、假体周围骨折和伸肌机制并发症是最常见的失败模式。术前与术后KSS比较,P值有显著性差异。结论:种植体累积成活率为87.8%。假体关节感染是因各种适应症接受第三代RHK手术的患者最常见的失败模式。具有高Charlson合并症指数的患者是旋转铰链植入失败的主要危险因素。
Mid-term results and survival rates following a single-design rotating hinge knee arthroplasty in non-tumor conditions in a Pakistani population.
Background: Information regarding the use of hinged implants in non-oncological conditions is limited in our region due to a lack of adequate data collection and follow-up. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term results and risk factors affecting the survivorship of third-generation rotating hinge knee (RHK) patients in non-oncological conditions.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 41 single, third-generation, rotating hinge prostheses in three complex primary knee procedures and 38 revision knee surgeries in between 2007 to 2014. Implant survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors influencing implant survival were identified using the log-rank test. During the study period, clinical results along with complications were assessed. Clinical outcomes were assessed by using the Knee Society Score (KSS).
Results: RHK arthroplasty was used in 41 patients. Out of 41 patients, a RHK was used in three patients with a complex primary deformed knee whereas in 38 patients, a RHK was used in revision arthroplasty surgery. The cumulative implant survival rate with re-revision due to any cause was found to be 87.8% (95% CI 69.2-90.1) at 5-7 years. Prosthetic joint infection, peri-prosthetic fracture and extensor mechanism complications were the commonest mode of failure. The P value was found to be significant when comparing KSS pre-operatively and post-operatively.
Conclusion: The cumulative implant survival rate was found to be 87.8%. Prosthetic joint infection was the commonest mode of failure in patients who underwent third-generation RHK surgery for variable indications. Being a patient with a high Charlson comorbidity index is the main risk factor associated with failure of the rotating hinge implant.