现代语言能力倾向测试的多面二分类Rasch模型分析。

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Mitch Porter, Stefanie A Wind
{"title":"现代语言能力倾向测试的多面二分类Rasch模型分析。","authors":"Mitch Porter,&nbsp;Stefanie A Wind","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers and practitioners have used the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) to assess language aptitude and identify possible language learning deficiencies in examinees since the 1950s. However, researchers have not assessed its psychometric properties using modern measurement theory methods. We use the dichotomous Rasch model to explore the psychometric properties of the MLAT, including data-model fit indices, item difficulty and student ability calibrations, reliability of separation, and differences in achievement across gender subgroups based on a sample of undergraduate and graduate university students (N=204). Our findings suggest that the MLAT has acceptable psychometric properties such that it can be meaningfully interpreted as a measure of language proficiency. Our findings confirm previous research that language performance across gender groups significantly differs. We found no significant interactions between gender subgroups and the difficulty of the five domains of the assessment. We discuss these results in terms of their implications for research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"21 3","pages":"260-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Many-facet Dichotomous Rasch Model Analysis of the Modern Language Aptitude Test.\",\"authors\":\"Mitch Porter,&nbsp;Stefanie A Wind\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Researchers and practitioners have used the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) to assess language aptitude and identify possible language learning deficiencies in examinees since the 1950s. However, researchers have not assessed its psychometric properties using modern measurement theory methods. We use the dichotomous Rasch model to explore the psychometric properties of the MLAT, including data-model fit indices, item difficulty and student ability calibrations, reliability of separation, and differences in achievement across gender subgroups based on a sample of undergraduate and graduate university students (N=204). Our findings suggest that the MLAT has acceptable psychometric properties such that it can be meaningfully interpreted as a measure of language proficiency. Our findings confirm previous research that language performance across gender groups significantly differs. We found no significant interactions between gender subgroups and the difficulty of the five domains of the assessment. We discuss these results in terms of their implications for research and practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"260-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自20世纪50年代以来,研究人员和实践者一直使用现代语言能力倾向测试(MLAT)来评估语言能力,并确定考生可能存在的语言学习缺陷。然而,研究人员尚未使用现代测量理论方法对其心理测量特性进行评估。本研究以204名本科生和研究生为样本,采用二分类Rasch模型探讨MLAT的心理测量特性,包括数据模型拟合指数、项目难度和学生能力校准、分离信度以及性别亚组之间的成就差异。我们的研究结果表明,MLAT具有可接受的心理测量特性,因此它可以被有意义地解释为语言熟练程度的衡量标准。我们的发现证实了之前的研究,即不同性别群体的语言表现存在显著差异。我们发现性别分组和五个评估领域的难度之间没有显著的相互作用。我们将讨论这些结果对研究和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Many-facet Dichotomous Rasch Model Analysis of the Modern Language Aptitude Test.

Researchers and practitioners have used the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) to assess language aptitude and identify possible language learning deficiencies in examinees since the 1950s. However, researchers have not assessed its psychometric properties using modern measurement theory methods. We use the dichotomous Rasch model to explore the psychometric properties of the MLAT, including data-model fit indices, item difficulty and student ability calibrations, reliability of separation, and differences in achievement across gender subgroups based on a sample of undergraduate and graduate university students (N=204). Our findings suggest that the MLAT has acceptable psychometric properties such that it can be meaningfully interpreted as a measure of language proficiency. Our findings confirm previous research that language performance across gender groups significantly differs. We found no significant interactions between gender subgroups and the difficulty of the five domains of the assessment. We discuss these results in terms of their implications for research and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of Egalitarian Education Questionnaire using Rasch Measurement Model. Bootstrap Estimate of Bias for Intraclass Correlation. Rasch's Logistic Model Applied to Growth. Psychometric Properties of the General Movement Optimality Score using Rasch Measurement. Rasch Analysis of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale: Evidence for the Abbreviated Version.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1