高中生自我效能感量表的心理测量特征探讨。

Journal of applied measurement Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Yuan Ge, Stefanie A Wind
{"title":"高中生自我效能感量表的心理测量特征探讨。","authors":"Yuan Ge,&nbsp;Stefanie A Wind","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In previous studies, researchers have focused on the development and interpretation of measurement tools related to self-efficacy. However, researchers have seldom investigated whether these instruments demonstrate acceptable psychometric properties, including similar item interpretations between subgroups of respondents. The purpose of this study was to explore the extent to which a self-efficacy measure has a consistent interpretation for two self-reported gender subgroups. The researchers utilized Rasch analysis to explore differences in item difficulty between the subgroups. Results suggested differences in item difficulty ordering for certain self-efficacy items. Implications for research and practice are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":73608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied measurement","volume":"21 3","pages":"313-328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring The Psychometric Properties of a Self-Efficacy Scale For High School Students.\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Ge,&nbsp;Stefanie A Wind\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In previous studies, researchers have focused on the development and interpretation of measurement tools related to self-efficacy. However, researchers have seldom investigated whether these instruments demonstrate acceptable psychometric properties, including similar item interpretations between subgroups of respondents. The purpose of this study was to explore the extent to which a self-efficacy measure has a consistent interpretation for two self-reported gender subgroups. The researchers utilized Rasch analysis to explore differences in item difficulty between the subgroups. Results suggested differences in item difficulty ordering for certain self-efficacy items. Implications for research and practice are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"313-328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在以往的研究中,研究人员主要关注与自我效能感相关的测量工具的开发和解释。然而,研究人员很少调查这些工具是否表现出可接受的心理测量特性,包括在被调查者亚组之间类似的项目解释。本研究的目的是探讨自我效能感测量在多大程度上对两个自我报告的性别亚组具有一致的解释。研究人员利用Rasch分析来探索子组之间项目难度的差异。结果表明,某些自我效能感项目的难度排序存在差异。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring The Psychometric Properties of a Self-Efficacy Scale For High School Students.

In previous studies, researchers have focused on the development and interpretation of measurement tools related to self-efficacy. However, researchers have seldom investigated whether these instruments demonstrate acceptable psychometric properties, including similar item interpretations between subgroups of respondents. The purpose of this study was to explore the extent to which a self-efficacy measure has a consistent interpretation for two self-reported gender subgroups. The researchers utilized Rasch analysis to explore differences in item difficulty between the subgroups. Results suggested differences in item difficulty ordering for certain self-efficacy items. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of Egalitarian Education Questionnaire using Rasch Measurement Model. Bootstrap Estimate of Bias for Intraclass Correlation. Rasch's Logistic Model Applied to Growth. Psychometric Properties of the General Movement Optimality Score using Rasch Measurement. Rasch Analysis of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale: Evidence for the Abbreviated Version.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1