银屑病关节炎临床试验的综合措施:在英国一项多中心研究中测试疼痛和疲劳改变。

William Tillett, Oliver FitzGerald, Laura C Coates, Jon Packham, Deepak R Jadon, Marco Massarotti, Mel Brook, Suzanne Lane, Paul Creamer, Anna Antony, Eleanor Korendowych, Adwaye Rambojun, Neil J McHugh, Philip S Helliwell
{"title":"银屑病关节炎临床试验的综合措施:在英国一项多中心研究中测试疼痛和疲劳改变。","authors":"William Tillett,&nbsp;Oliver FitzGerald,&nbsp;Laura C Coates,&nbsp;Jon Packham,&nbsp;Deepak R Jadon,&nbsp;Marco Massarotti,&nbsp;Mel Brook,&nbsp;Suzanne Lane,&nbsp;Paul Creamer,&nbsp;Anna Antony,&nbsp;Eleanor Korendowych,&nbsp;Adwaye Rambojun,&nbsp;Neil J McHugh,&nbsp;Philip S Helliwell","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.201674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the addition of pain and fatigue to the Composite Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity (CPDAI) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and PsA (GRAPPA) Composite Exercise (GRACE) composite measures of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed in patients with PsA at 3 consecutive follow-up visits over 6 months in a UK multicenter observational study. A pain visual analog scale and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue scale were added as modifications to the CPDAI and GRACE composite measures. Original and modified versions were tested against the PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and the Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA). Discrimination between disease states and responsiveness were tested with <i>t</i>-scores, standardized response means (SRMs), and effect sizes. Data were presented to members at the 2020 annual meeting who then voted on the GRAPPA-recommended composite and treatment targets for clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-one patients were recruited with a mean PsA disease duration of 6.1 years (range 0-41 yrs). The SRMs for the GRACE and modified GRACE (mGRACE) were 0.67 and 0.64, respectively, and 0.54 and 0.46, respectively, for the CPDAI and modified CPDAI (mCPDAI). The <i>t</i>-scores for the GRACE and mGRACE were unchanged at 7.8 for both, and 6.8 and 7.0 for the CPDAI and mCPDAI, respectively. The PASDAS demonstrated the best responsiveness (SRM 0.84) and discrimination (<i>t</i>-scores 8.3). Most members (82%) agreed the composites should not be modified and 77% voted for the PASDAS as the GRAPPA-recommended composite for clinical trials, with 90% minimal disease activity (MDA) as the target.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modifying the CPDAI and GRACE with the addition of pain and fatigue does not enhance responsiveness nor the measures' ability to detect disease status in terms of requiring treatment escalation. GRAPPA members voted for the PASDAS as the composite measure in clinical trials and MDA as the target.</p>","PeriodicalId":35278,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","volume":"97 ","pages":"39-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Composite Measures for Clinical Trials in Psoriatic Arthritis: Testing Pain and Fatigue Modifications in a UK Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"William Tillett,&nbsp;Oliver FitzGerald,&nbsp;Laura C Coates,&nbsp;Jon Packham,&nbsp;Deepak R Jadon,&nbsp;Marco Massarotti,&nbsp;Mel Brook,&nbsp;Suzanne Lane,&nbsp;Paul Creamer,&nbsp;Anna Antony,&nbsp;Eleanor Korendowych,&nbsp;Adwaye Rambojun,&nbsp;Neil J McHugh,&nbsp;Philip S Helliwell\",\"doi\":\"10.3899/jrheum.201674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the addition of pain and fatigue to the Composite Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity (CPDAI) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and PsA (GRAPPA) Composite Exercise (GRACE) composite measures of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed in patients with PsA at 3 consecutive follow-up visits over 6 months in a UK multicenter observational study. A pain visual analog scale and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue scale were added as modifications to the CPDAI and GRACE composite measures. Original and modified versions were tested against the PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and the Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA). Discrimination between disease states and responsiveness were tested with <i>t</i>-scores, standardized response means (SRMs), and effect sizes. Data were presented to members at the 2020 annual meeting who then voted on the GRAPPA-recommended composite and treatment targets for clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-one patients were recruited with a mean PsA disease duration of 6.1 years (range 0-41 yrs). The SRMs for the GRACE and modified GRACE (mGRACE) were 0.67 and 0.64, respectively, and 0.54 and 0.46, respectively, for the CPDAI and modified CPDAI (mCPDAI). The <i>t</i>-scores for the GRACE and mGRACE were unchanged at 7.8 for both, and 6.8 and 7.0 for the CPDAI and mCPDAI, respectively. The PASDAS demonstrated the best responsiveness (SRM 0.84) and discrimination (<i>t</i>-scores 8.3). Most members (82%) agreed the composites should not be modified and 77% voted for the PASDAS as the GRAPPA-recommended composite for clinical trials, with 90% minimal disease activity (MDA) as the target.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modifying the CPDAI and GRACE with the addition of pain and fatigue does not enhance responsiveness nor the measures' ability to detect disease status in terms of requiring treatment escalation. GRAPPA members voted for the PASDAS as the composite measure in clinical trials and MDA as the target.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"39-44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.201674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:探讨在银屑病关节炎(PsA)综合活动(CPDAI)中加入疼痛和疲劳以及银屑病与PsA研究评估组(GRAPPA)综合运动(GRACE)对银屑病关节炎(PsA)的综合措施。方法:在英国的一项多中心观察性研究中,对PsA患者进行了为期6个月的连续3次随访,评估了临床和患者报告的结果。添加疼痛视觉模拟量表和慢性疾病治疗疲劳功能评估量表作为对CPDAI和GRACE复合测量的修改。对原始版本和修改版本进行PsA疾病活动评分(PASDAS)和PsA疾病活动指数(DAPSA)测试。用t评分、标准化反应均值(SRMs)和效应量检验疾病状态和反应性之间的区别。数据在2020年年会上提交给成员,然后他们对grappa推荐的复合材料和临床试验的治疗目标进行投票。结果:141名患者被招募,平均PsA病程为6.1年(范围0-41年)。GRACE和改良GRACE (mGRACE)的srm分别为0.67和0.64,CPDAI和改良CPDAI (mCPDAI)的srm分别为0.54和0.46。GRACE和mGRACE的t分不变,均为7.8分,CPDAI和mCPDAI分别为6.8分和7.0分。PASDAS表现出最佳的反应性(SRM = 0.84)和辨别性(t-score = 8.3)。大多数成员(82%)同意复合材料不应该被修改,77%的成员投票支持PASDAS作为grappa推荐的临床试验复合材料,以90%的最小疾病活性(MDA)为目标。结论:通过增加疼痛和疲劳来修改CPDAI和GRACE并没有提高反应性,也没有提高检测疾病状态的能力,就需要增加治疗而言。GRAPPA成员投票通过PASDAS作为临床试验的复合指标,MDA作为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Composite Measures for Clinical Trials in Psoriatic Arthritis: Testing Pain and Fatigue Modifications in a UK Multicenter Study.

Objective: To test the addition of pain and fatigue to the Composite Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity (CPDAI) and the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and PsA (GRAPPA) Composite Exercise (GRACE) composite measures of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods: Clinical and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed in patients with PsA at 3 consecutive follow-up visits over 6 months in a UK multicenter observational study. A pain visual analog scale and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue scale were added as modifications to the CPDAI and GRACE composite measures. Original and modified versions were tested against the PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) and the Disease Activity Index for PsA (DAPSA). Discrimination between disease states and responsiveness were tested with t-scores, standardized response means (SRMs), and effect sizes. Data were presented to members at the 2020 annual meeting who then voted on the GRAPPA-recommended composite and treatment targets for clinical trials.

Results: One hundred forty-one patients were recruited with a mean PsA disease duration of 6.1 years (range 0-41 yrs). The SRMs for the GRACE and modified GRACE (mGRACE) were 0.67 and 0.64, respectively, and 0.54 and 0.46, respectively, for the CPDAI and modified CPDAI (mCPDAI). The t-scores for the GRACE and mGRACE were unchanged at 7.8 for both, and 6.8 and 7.0 for the CPDAI and mCPDAI, respectively. The PASDAS demonstrated the best responsiveness (SRM 0.84) and discrimination (t-scores 8.3). Most members (82%) agreed the composites should not be modified and 77% voted for the PASDAS as the GRAPPA-recommended composite for clinical trials, with 90% minimal disease activity (MDA) as the target.

Conclusion: Modifying the CPDAI and GRACE with the addition of pain and fatigue does not enhance responsiveness nor the measures' ability to detect disease status in terms of requiring treatment escalation. GRAPPA members voted for the PASDAS as the composite measure in clinical trials and MDA as the target.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Duncan A. Gordon, The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 36 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
期刊最新文献
Cluster Analysis To Explore Clinical Subphenotypes Of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss). Feasibility of Conducting Comparative Effectiveness Research and Validation of a Clinical Disease Activity Score for Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis Febuxostat Use and Safety in Patients With Hyperuricemia Long-term Behavioral Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Impact of Vaccination in Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases The Patient Experience of Drug Side Effects in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Intriguing Data From an Exploratory Online Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1