高档化、城市干预和公平(GENUINE):一个基于地图的加拿大大都市高档化工具。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Reports Pub Date : 2021-05-19 DOI:10.25318/82-003-x202100500002-eng
Caislin L Firth, Benoit Thierry, Daniel Fuller, Meghan Winters, Yan Kestens
{"title":"高档化、城市干预和公平(GENUINE):一个基于地图的加拿大大都市高档化工具。","authors":"Caislin L Firth,&nbsp;Benoit Thierry,&nbsp;Daniel Fuller,&nbsp;Meghan Winters,&nbsp;Yan Kestens","doi":"10.25318/82-003-x202100500002-eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Researchers, policy makers, and urban planners require tools to better understand the complex relationship between gentrification and health. The Gentrification, Urban Interventions and Equity (GENUINE) tool is an open-access, map-based tool that allows users to explore measures of gentrification for Canadian cities and incorporate them into their work.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>The phenomenon of gentrification has manifested differently across cities. The GENUINE tool was developed to include four distinct gentrification measures that have been used in the United States and Canada and that rely on different combinations of change in census indicators related to income, housing, occupation, education and age. The measures were computed for all census tracts within the 36 Canadian census metropolitan areas to identify gentrifiable areas in 2006 and those that gentrified between 2006 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depending on the measure, by 2016, 2% to 20% of census tracts had experienced gentrification, corresponding to between 2% (418,065 people) and 17% (4,266,434) of the Canadian population living in gentrified areas. Generally, metropolitan areas with populations over 1 million people had a greater proportion of their population living in gentrified areas (2% to 18%) compared with metropolitan areas with fewer than 250,000 residents (1% to 14%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With attention on healthy cities only expanding, GENUINE provides pan-Canadian indicators of gentrification, which can be an integral part of solution-oriented research and advancing cities toward designing healthy and equitable communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49196,"journal":{"name":"Health Reports","volume":"32 5","pages":"15-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gentrification, Urban Interventions and Equity (GENUINE): A map-based gentrification tool for Canadian metropolitan areas.\",\"authors\":\"Caislin L Firth,&nbsp;Benoit Thierry,&nbsp;Daniel Fuller,&nbsp;Meghan Winters,&nbsp;Yan Kestens\",\"doi\":\"10.25318/82-003-x202100500002-eng\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Researchers, policy makers, and urban planners require tools to better understand the complex relationship between gentrification and health. The Gentrification, Urban Interventions and Equity (GENUINE) tool is an open-access, map-based tool that allows users to explore measures of gentrification for Canadian cities and incorporate them into their work.</p><p><strong>Data and methods: </strong>The phenomenon of gentrification has manifested differently across cities. The GENUINE tool was developed to include four distinct gentrification measures that have been used in the United States and Canada and that rely on different combinations of change in census indicators related to income, housing, occupation, education and age. The measures were computed for all census tracts within the 36 Canadian census metropolitan areas to identify gentrifiable areas in 2006 and those that gentrified between 2006 and 2016.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Depending on the measure, by 2016, 2% to 20% of census tracts had experienced gentrification, corresponding to between 2% (418,065 people) and 17% (4,266,434) of the Canadian population living in gentrified areas. Generally, metropolitan areas with populations over 1 million people had a greater proportion of their population living in gentrified areas (2% to 18%) compared with metropolitan areas with fewer than 250,000 residents (1% to 14%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>With attention on healthy cities only expanding, GENUINE provides pan-Canadian indicators of gentrification, which can be an integral part of solution-oriented research and advancing cities toward designing healthy and equitable communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Reports\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"15-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202100500002-eng\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202100500002-eng","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

背景:研究人员、政策制定者和城市规划者需要工具来更好地理解中产阶级化与健康之间的复杂关系。“中产阶级化、城市干预和公平”(GENUINE)工具是一个开放获取的基于地图的工具,允许用户探索加拿大城市中产阶级化的措施,并将其纳入他们的工作中。数据与方法:中产阶级化现象在不同城市表现不同。开发了GENUINE工具,以包括美国和加拿大使用的四种不同的高档化措施,这些措施依赖于与收入、住房、职业、教育和年龄有关的人口普查指标变化的不同组合。这些措施是对36个加拿大人口普查大都市区内的所有人口普查区进行计算的,以确定2006年的士绅化区域以及2006年至2016年间的士绅化区域。结果:根据衡量标准,到2016年,2%至20%的人口普查区经历了中产阶级化,相当于2%(418,065人)至17%(4,266,434人)的加拿大人口生活在中产阶级化地区。一般来说,人口超过100万的大都市区,与人口少于25万的大都市区(1%至14%)相比,居住在中产阶级化地区的人口比例更高(2%至18%)。讨论:随着对健康城市的关注不断扩大,GENUINE提供了泛加拿大的中产阶级化指标,这可以成为以解决方案为导向的研究的组成部分,并推动城市朝着设计健康和公平的社区的方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gentrification, Urban Interventions and Equity (GENUINE): A map-based gentrification tool for Canadian metropolitan areas.

Background: Researchers, policy makers, and urban planners require tools to better understand the complex relationship between gentrification and health. The Gentrification, Urban Interventions and Equity (GENUINE) tool is an open-access, map-based tool that allows users to explore measures of gentrification for Canadian cities and incorporate them into their work.

Data and methods: The phenomenon of gentrification has manifested differently across cities. The GENUINE tool was developed to include four distinct gentrification measures that have been used in the United States and Canada and that rely on different combinations of change in census indicators related to income, housing, occupation, education and age. The measures were computed for all census tracts within the 36 Canadian census metropolitan areas to identify gentrifiable areas in 2006 and those that gentrified between 2006 and 2016.

Results: Depending on the measure, by 2016, 2% to 20% of census tracts had experienced gentrification, corresponding to between 2% (418,065 people) and 17% (4,266,434) of the Canadian population living in gentrified areas. Generally, metropolitan areas with populations over 1 million people had a greater proportion of their population living in gentrified areas (2% to 18%) compared with metropolitan areas with fewer than 250,000 residents (1% to 14%).

Discussion: With attention on healthy cities only expanding, GENUINE provides pan-Canadian indicators of gentrification, which can be an integral part of solution-oriented research and advancing cities toward designing healthy and equitable communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Reports
Health Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Health Reports publishes original research on diverse topics related to understanding and improving the health of populations and the delivery of health care. We publish studies based on analyses of Canadian national/provincial representative surveys or Canadian national/provincial administrative databases, as well as results of international comparative health research. Health Reports encourages the sharing of methodological information among those engaged in the analysis of health surveys or administrative databases. Use of the most current data available is advised for all submissions.
期刊最新文献
Mental health and access to support among 2SLGBTQ+ youth. Updated breast cancer costs for women by disease stage and phase of care using population-based databases. Child care for young children with disabilities. From BpTRU to OMRON: The impact of changing automated blood pressure measurement devices on adult population estimates of blood pressure and hypertension. Trends in household food insecurity from the Canadian Community Health Survey, 2017 to 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1