沟通方式对失聪和重听儿童照顾者评分的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology: Child Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-23 DOI:10.1080/21622965.2021.1916495
Evelyn L Fisher, Lia K Thibodaux, Danielle Previ, Jennifer Reesman
{"title":"沟通方式对失聪和重听儿童照顾者评分的影响。","authors":"Evelyn L Fisher,&nbsp;Lia K Thibodaux,&nbsp;Danielle Previ,&nbsp;Jennifer Reesman","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2021.1916495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Literature on children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) suggests overall increased rates of difficulties in emotional/behavioral and adaptive functioning. However, limitations of this literature include the failure to integrate issues unique to the experience of children who are DHH, such as home and school communication modalities and the consistency of modalities across settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study examined de-identified data from a clinical database. Data included caregiver ratings of emotional/behavioral and adaptive functioning in a diverse sample of clinically referred children who are DHH (<i>N</i> = 177). Caregivers also reported home and school communication modalities (e.g., match, partial match, different modalities). We examined mean score differences between our sample and normative samples and compared functioning across subgroups of children with various home-school communication modality combinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent with the literature, we found overall increased rates of emotional/behavioral and adaptive functioning concerns on parent rating scales. Emotional/behavioral concerns did not differ among children with spoken language match, sign language match, or partial match communication modalities combinations. Within adaptive functioning, communication and functional academics were significantly lower among children with partial match home-school communication modalities. Adaptive functioning did not differ between spoken language match and sign language match groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest possible benefits to adaptive functioning among children who are DHH when home and school communication modalities match, regardless of which modality is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":"11 4","pages":"598-609"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21622965.2021.1916495","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of communication modality on caregiver ratings for deaf and hard of hearing children.\",\"authors\":\"Evelyn L Fisher,&nbsp;Lia K Thibodaux,&nbsp;Danielle Previ,&nbsp;Jennifer Reesman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21622965.2021.1916495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Literature on children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) suggests overall increased rates of difficulties in emotional/behavioral and adaptive functioning. However, limitations of this literature include the failure to integrate issues unique to the experience of children who are DHH, such as home and school communication modalities and the consistency of modalities across settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study examined de-identified data from a clinical database. Data included caregiver ratings of emotional/behavioral and adaptive functioning in a diverse sample of clinically referred children who are DHH (<i>N</i> = 177). Caregivers also reported home and school communication modalities (e.g., match, partial match, different modalities). We examined mean score differences between our sample and normative samples and compared functioning across subgroups of children with various home-school communication modality combinations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent with the literature, we found overall increased rates of emotional/behavioral and adaptive functioning concerns on parent rating scales. Emotional/behavioral concerns did not differ among children with spoken language match, sign language match, or partial match communication modalities combinations. Within adaptive functioning, communication and functional academics were significantly lower among children with partial match home-school communication modalities. Adaptive functioning did not differ between spoken language match and sign language match groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest possible benefits to adaptive functioning among children who are DHH when home and school communication modalities match, regardless of which modality is used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"598-609\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21622965.2021.1916495\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1916495\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1916495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于失聪或听力障碍儿童(DHH)的文献表明,情感/行为和适应功能障碍的总体发生率增加。然而,该文献的局限性包括未能整合DHH儿童的独特经历,例如家庭和学校的沟通方式以及不同环境下模式的一致性。方法:本研究检查了来自临床数据库的去识别数据。数据包括在临床转诊的DHH儿童(N = 177)的不同样本中照顾者的情绪/行为和适应功能评分。照顾者还报告了家庭和学校的沟通方式(例如,匹配,部分匹配,不同的方式)。我们检查了样本和规范样本之间的平均分差异,并比较了不同家校沟通方式组合的儿童亚组的功能。结果:与文献一致,我们发现父母评定量表中情绪/行为和适应功能问题的总体比例增加。在口语匹配、手语匹配或部分匹配沟通方式组合的儿童中,情绪/行为问题没有差异。在适应功能方面,部分匹配家校沟通模式的儿童的沟通和功能性学术显著较低。适应功能在口语匹配组和手语匹配组之间没有差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,当家庭和学校的沟通方式相匹配时,无论使用哪种方式,DHH儿童的适应功能都可能受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of communication modality on caregiver ratings for deaf and hard of hearing children.

Purpose: Literature on children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) suggests overall increased rates of difficulties in emotional/behavioral and adaptive functioning. However, limitations of this literature include the failure to integrate issues unique to the experience of children who are DHH, such as home and school communication modalities and the consistency of modalities across settings.

Method: This study examined de-identified data from a clinical database. Data included caregiver ratings of emotional/behavioral and adaptive functioning in a diverse sample of clinically referred children who are DHH (N = 177). Caregivers also reported home and school communication modalities (e.g., match, partial match, different modalities). We examined mean score differences between our sample and normative samples and compared functioning across subgroups of children with various home-school communication modality combinations.

Results: Consistent with the literature, we found overall increased rates of emotional/behavioral and adaptive functioning concerns on parent rating scales. Emotional/behavioral concerns did not differ among children with spoken language match, sign language match, or partial match communication modalities combinations. Within adaptive functioning, communication and functional academics were significantly lower among children with partial match home-school communication modalities. Adaptive functioning did not differ between spoken language match and sign language match groups.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest possible benefits to adaptive functioning among children who are DHH when home and school communication modalities match, regardless of which modality is used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Differential diagnosis: Understanding nonverbal learning disorder and autism spectrum disorder. Chanting and meditation: an 8-week intervention to promote executive functions in school-age children. About the relationship between executive function, theory of mind, and language abilities in children with autism: a systematic review. Cognitive profiles and developmental variations in ADHD: A comparative analysis of childhood and adolescent diagnoses. A novel approach to ADHD classification based on severity and emotional impairment: Findings from artificial intelligence analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1