COVID-19:事实、数字、估计关系和分析。

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Indian Economic Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-17 DOI:10.1007/s41775-021-00111-y
Ranjan Ray, Sanjesh Kumar
{"title":"COVID-19:事实、数字、估计关系和分析。","authors":"Ranjan Ray, Sanjesh Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s41775-021-00111-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study attempts an integrated analysis of the health and economic aspects of COVID-19 that is based on publicly available data from a wide range of data sources. The analysis is done keeping in mind the close interaction between the health and economic shocks of COVID-19. The study combines descriptive and qualitative approaches using figures and graphs with quantitative methods that estimate the plotted relationships and econometric estimation that attempts to explain cross-country variation in COVID-19 incidence, deaths and 'case fatality rates'. The study seeks to answer a set of questions on COVID-19 such as: what are the economic effects of COVID-19, focussing on international inequality and global poverty? How effective was lockdown in curbing COVID-19? What was the effect of lockdown on economic growth? Did the stimulus packages work in delinking the health shocks from the economic ones? Did 'better governed countries' with greater public trust and those with superior health care fare better than others? Did countries that have experienced previous outbreaks such as SARS fare better than those who have not? The study provides mixed messages on the effectiveness of lockdowns in controlling COVID-19. While several countries, especially in the East Asia and Pacific region, have used it quite effectively recording low infection rates going into lockdown and staying low after the lockdown, the two spectacular failures are Brazil and India. In contrast to lockdown, the evidence on the effectiveness of stimulus programs in avoiding recession and promoting growth is unequivocal. The effectiveness is much greater in the case of emerging/developing economies than in the advanced economies. Multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the IMF need to work out a coordinated strategy to declare immediate debt relief and provide additional liquidity to the poorer economies to help them announce effective stimulus measures. COVID-19 will lead to a large increase in the global pool of those living in 'extreme poverty'. A poignant feature of our results is that while a significant share of health shocks from COVID-19 is borne by the advanced economies, the burden of 'COVID-19 poverty' will almost exclusively fall on two of the poorest regions, namely, Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.</p>","PeriodicalId":36028,"journal":{"name":"Indian Economic Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19: facts, figures, estimated relationships and analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ranjan Ray, Sanjesh Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41775-021-00111-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study attempts an integrated analysis of the health and economic aspects of COVID-19 that is based on publicly available data from a wide range of data sources. The analysis is done keeping in mind the close interaction between the health and economic shocks of COVID-19. The study combines descriptive and qualitative approaches using figures and graphs with quantitative methods that estimate the plotted relationships and econometric estimation that attempts to explain cross-country variation in COVID-19 incidence, deaths and 'case fatality rates'. The study seeks to answer a set of questions on COVID-19 such as: what are the economic effects of COVID-19, focussing on international inequality and global poverty? How effective was lockdown in curbing COVID-19? What was the effect of lockdown on economic growth? Did the stimulus packages work in delinking the health shocks from the economic ones? Did 'better governed countries' with greater public trust and those with superior health care fare better than others? Did countries that have experienced previous outbreaks such as SARS fare better than those who have not? The study provides mixed messages on the effectiveness of lockdowns in controlling COVID-19. While several countries, especially in the East Asia and Pacific region, have used it quite effectively recording low infection rates going into lockdown and staying low after the lockdown, the two spectacular failures are Brazil and India. In contrast to lockdown, the evidence on the effectiveness of stimulus programs in avoiding recession and promoting growth is unequivocal. The effectiveness is much greater in the case of emerging/developing economies than in the advanced economies. Multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the IMF need to work out a coordinated strategy to declare immediate debt relief and provide additional liquidity to the poorer economies to help them announce effective stimulus measures. COVID-19 will lead to a large increase in the global pool of those living in 'extreme poverty'. A poignant feature of our results is that while a significant share of health shocks from COVID-19 is borne by the advanced economies, the burden of 'COVID-19 poverty' will almost exclusively fall on two of the poorest regions, namely, Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Economic Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8127513/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41775-021-00111-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41775-021-00111-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究试图对 COVID-19 的健康和经济方面进行综合分析,该分析基于来自各种数据来源的公开数据。分析时考虑到了 COVID-19 的健康和经济冲击之间的密切互动关系。本研究将使用数字和图表的描述性和定性方法与估算图中关系的定量方法以及试图解释 COVID-19 发病率、死亡人数和 "病死率 "的跨国变化的计量经济学估算相结合。本研究试图回答一系列有关 COVID-19 的问题,如:COVID-19 对经济有哪些影响?封锁在遏制 COVID-19 方面的效果如何?封锁对经济增长有何影响?一揽子经济刺激计划是否能使健康冲击与经济冲击脱钩?公众信任度较高的 "治理较好的国家 "和拥有优质医疗服务的国家是否比其他国家表现得更好?以前爆发过 SARS 等疾病的国家是否比没有爆发过的国家表现更好?关于封锁在控制 COVID-19 方面的效果,研究提供的信息不一。虽然有几个国家,特别是东亚和太平洋地区的国家,相当有效地使用了这种方法,记录了进入封锁期时的低感染率和封锁后的低感染率,但巴西和印度是两个明显失败的国家。与封锁相比,刺激计划在避免衰退和促进增长方面的有效性证据确凿。新兴/发展中经济体的效果要比发达经济体好得多。世界银行和国际货币基金组织(IMF)等多边机构需要制定协调一致的战略,宣布立即减免债务,并向较贫穷的经济体提供额外的流动资金,帮助它们宣布有效的刺激措施。COVID-19 将导致全球 "赤贫 "人口大幅增加。我们研究结果的一个显著特点是,虽然 COVID-19 带来的健康冲击的很大一部分由发达经济体承担,但 "COVID-19 贫困 "的负担几乎完全落在两个最贫困的地区,即撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19: facts, figures, estimated relationships and analysis.

This study attempts an integrated analysis of the health and economic aspects of COVID-19 that is based on publicly available data from a wide range of data sources. The analysis is done keeping in mind the close interaction between the health and economic shocks of COVID-19. The study combines descriptive and qualitative approaches using figures and graphs with quantitative methods that estimate the plotted relationships and econometric estimation that attempts to explain cross-country variation in COVID-19 incidence, deaths and 'case fatality rates'. The study seeks to answer a set of questions on COVID-19 such as: what are the economic effects of COVID-19, focussing on international inequality and global poverty? How effective was lockdown in curbing COVID-19? What was the effect of lockdown on economic growth? Did the stimulus packages work in delinking the health shocks from the economic ones? Did 'better governed countries' with greater public trust and those with superior health care fare better than others? Did countries that have experienced previous outbreaks such as SARS fare better than those who have not? The study provides mixed messages on the effectiveness of lockdowns in controlling COVID-19. While several countries, especially in the East Asia and Pacific region, have used it quite effectively recording low infection rates going into lockdown and staying low after the lockdown, the two spectacular failures are Brazil and India. In contrast to lockdown, the evidence on the effectiveness of stimulus programs in avoiding recession and promoting growth is unequivocal. The effectiveness is much greater in the case of emerging/developing economies than in the advanced economies. Multilateral institutions such as the World Bank and the IMF need to work out a coordinated strategy to declare immediate debt relief and provide additional liquidity to the poorer economies to help them announce effective stimulus measures. COVID-19 will lead to a large increase in the global pool of those living in 'extreme poverty'. A poignant feature of our results is that while a significant share of health shocks from COVID-19 is borne by the advanced economies, the burden of 'COVID-19 poverty' will almost exclusively fall on two of the poorest regions, namely, Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Economic Review
Indian Economic Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Indian Economic Review aims to provide a platform for dissemination of innovative research in economics that employs theoretical and empirical approaches. Original research in all areas of economics is welcome. These areas include but are not limited toAgricultural and resource economics Behavioural economics Development economics Economic theory Economics of health and education Environmental economics Experimental economics Game theory Industrial organisation International trade and finance Law and economics Macro and monetary economics Poverty and inequality
期刊最新文献
A long-term perspective on collecting Indian agricultural statistics: reviewing the purposes, methods, and implications for Indian development policy Unpacking India’s fiscal responses to COVID-19: a computable general equilibrium modelling analysis A tale of declining public provision and burgeoning private supplements Trade, labour reallocation and productivity growth in the indian manufacturing sector Income mobility across castes in India: a longitudinal analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1