Marc J Weigensberg, Quintila Àvila, Donna Spruijt-Metz, Jaimie N Davis, Cheng K F Wen, Kim Goodman, Marisa Perdomo, Niquelle Brown Wadé, Li Ding, Christianne J Lane
{"title":"想象健康:引导意象生活方式干预改善拉丁裔青少年肥胖相关生活方式行为的随机对照试验。","authors":"Marc J Weigensberg, Quintila Àvila, Donna Spruijt-Metz, Jaimie N Davis, Cheng K F Wen, Kim Goodman, Marisa Perdomo, Niquelle Brown Wadé, Li Ding, Christianne J Lane","doi":"10.1089/acm.2020.0515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> To determine the effects of a novel lifestyle intervention combining lifestyle behavioral education with the complementary-integrative health modality of guided imagery (GI) on dietary and physical activity behaviors in adolescents. The primary aim of this study was to determine the incremental effects of the lifestyle education, stress reduction GI (SRGI), and lifestyle behavior GI (LBGI) components of the intervention on the primary outcome of physical activity lifestyle behaviors (sedentary behavior, light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity), as well as dietary intake behaviors, at the completion of the 12-week intervention. The authors hypothesized that the intervention would improve obesity-related lifestyle behaviors. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Two hundred and thirty-two adolescent participants (aged 14-17 years, sophomore or junior year of high school) were cluster randomized by school into one of four intervention arms: nonintervention Control (C), Lifestyle education (LS), SRGI, and LBGI. After-school intervention sessions were held two (LS) or three (SRGI, LBGI) times weekly for 12 weeks. Physical activity (accelerometry) and dietary intake (multiple diet recalls) outcomes were assessed pre- and postintervention. Primary analysis: intention-to-treat (ITT) mixed-effects modeling with diagonal covariance matrices; secondary analysis: <i>ad hoc</i> subgroup sensitivity analysis using only those participants adherent to protocol. <b><i>Results:</i></b> ITT analysis showed that the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) increased in the LS group compared with C (<i>p</i> = 0.02), but there was no additional effect of GI. Among adherent participants, sedentary behavior was decreased stepwise relative to C in SRGI (<i>d</i> = -0.73, <i>p</i> = 0.004) > LBGI (<i>d</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.04) > LS (<i>d</i> = -0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.07), and moderate + vigorous physical activity was increased in SRGI (<i>d</i> = 0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Among adherent participants, the HEI was increased in LS and SRGI, and glycemic index reduced in LBGI. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> While ITT analysis was negative, among adherent participants, the Imagine HEALTH lifestyle intervention improved eating habits, reduced sedentary activity, and increased physical activity, suggesting that GI may amplify the role of lifestyle education alone for some key outcomes. Clinical Trials.gov ID: NCT02088294.</p>","PeriodicalId":14944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","volume":"27 9","pages":"738-749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558072/pdf/acm.2020.0515.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imagine HEALTH: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Guided Imagery Lifestyle Intervention to Improve Obesity-Related Lifestyle Behaviors in Predominantly Latinx Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Marc J Weigensberg, Quintila Àvila, Donna Spruijt-Metz, Jaimie N Davis, Cheng K F Wen, Kim Goodman, Marisa Perdomo, Niquelle Brown Wadé, Li Ding, Christianne J Lane\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/acm.2020.0515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> To determine the effects of a novel lifestyle intervention combining lifestyle behavioral education with the complementary-integrative health modality of guided imagery (GI) on dietary and physical activity behaviors in adolescents. The primary aim of this study was to determine the incremental effects of the lifestyle education, stress reduction GI (SRGI), and lifestyle behavior GI (LBGI) components of the intervention on the primary outcome of physical activity lifestyle behaviors (sedentary behavior, light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity), as well as dietary intake behaviors, at the completion of the 12-week intervention. The authors hypothesized that the intervention would improve obesity-related lifestyle behaviors. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Two hundred and thirty-two adolescent participants (aged 14-17 years, sophomore or junior year of high school) were cluster randomized by school into one of four intervention arms: nonintervention Control (C), Lifestyle education (LS), SRGI, and LBGI. After-school intervention sessions were held two (LS) or three (SRGI, LBGI) times weekly for 12 weeks. Physical activity (accelerometry) and dietary intake (multiple diet recalls) outcomes were assessed pre- and postintervention. Primary analysis: intention-to-treat (ITT) mixed-effects modeling with diagonal covariance matrices; secondary analysis: <i>ad hoc</i> subgroup sensitivity analysis using only those participants adherent to protocol. <b><i>Results:</i></b> ITT analysis showed that the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) increased in the LS group compared with C (<i>p</i> = 0.02), but there was no additional effect of GI. Among adherent participants, sedentary behavior was decreased stepwise relative to C in SRGI (<i>d</i> = -0.73, <i>p</i> = 0.004) > LBGI (<i>d</i> = -0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.04) > LS (<i>d</i> = -0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.07), and moderate + vigorous physical activity was increased in SRGI (<i>d</i> = 0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Among adherent participants, the HEI was increased in LS and SRGI, and glycemic index reduced in LBGI. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> While ITT analysis was negative, among adherent participants, the Imagine HEALTH lifestyle intervention improved eating habits, reduced sedentary activity, and increased physical activity, suggesting that GI may amplify the role of lifestyle education alone for some key outcomes. Clinical Trials.gov ID: NCT02088294.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine\",\"volume\":\"27 9\",\"pages\":\"738-749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8558072/pdf/acm.2020.0515.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0515\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
前言:研究一种新型的生活方式干预方法,将生活方式行为教育与引导意象(GI)的互补-综合健康模式相结合,对青少年饮食和身体活动行为的影响。本研究的主要目的是确定在12周干预结束时,生活方式教育、压力减轻GI (SRGI)和生活方式行为GI (LBGI)组成部分对身体活动生活方式行为(久坐行为、轻度、中度和剧烈身体活动)以及饮食摄入行为的主要结果的增量影响。作者假设这种干预会改善与肥胖相关的生活方式行为。材料与方法:232名青少年参与者(14-17岁,高中二年级或三年级)按学校随机分为四个干预组:非干预控制(C),生活方式教育(LS), SRGI和LBGI。课后干预每周进行2次(LS)或3次(SRGI, LBGI),持续12周。评估干预前后的身体活动(加速度计)和饮食摄入(多次饮食回忆)结果。初步分析:意向治疗(ITT)混合效应对角协方差矩阵模型;二次分析:仅使用那些遵守协议的参与者进行特设亚组敏感性分析。结果:ITT分析显示,LS组健康饮食指数(HEI)较C组升高(p = 0.02),但GI无额外影响。在坚持运动的参与者中,相对于C的SRGI (d = -0.73, p = 0.004) > LBGI (d = -0.59, p = 0.04) > LS (d = -0.41, p = 0.07),久坐行为逐渐减少,SRGI中+剧烈运动增加(d = 0.58, p = 0.001)。在坚持治疗的参与者中,LS和SRGI组的HEI升高,LBGI组的血糖指数降低。结论:虽然ITT分析为阴性,但在坚持的参与者中,想象健康生活方式干预改善了饮食习惯,减少了久坐活动,增加了身体活动,这表明GI可能放大了生活方式教育单独对某些关键结果的作用。临床试验。gov ID: NCT02088294。
Imagine HEALTH: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Guided Imagery Lifestyle Intervention to Improve Obesity-Related Lifestyle Behaviors in Predominantly Latinx Adolescents.
Introduction: To determine the effects of a novel lifestyle intervention combining lifestyle behavioral education with the complementary-integrative health modality of guided imagery (GI) on dietary and physical activity behaviors in adolescents. The primary aim of this study was to determine the incremental effects of the lifestyle education, stress reduction GI (SRGI), and lifestyle behavior GI (LBGI) components of the intervention on the primary outcome of physical activity lifestyle behaviors (sedentary behavior, light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity), as well as dietary intake behaviors, at the completion of the 12-week intervention. The authors hypothesized that the intervention would improve obesity-related lifestyle behaviors. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and thirty-two adolescent participants (aged 14-17 years, sophomore or junior year of high school) were cluster randomized by school into one of four intervention arms: nonintervention Control (C), Lifestyle education (LS), SRGI, and LBGI. After-school intervention sessions were held two (LS) or three (SRGI, LBGI) times weekly for 12 weeks. Physical activity (accelerometry) and dietary intake (multiple diet recalls) outcomes were assessed pre- and postintervention. Primary analysis: intention-to-treat (ITT) mixed-effects modeling with diagonal covariance matrices; secondary analysis: ad hoc subgroup sensitivity analysis using only those participants adherent to protocol. Results: ITT analysis showed that the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) increased in the LS group compared with C (p = 0.02), but there was no additional effect of GI. Among adherent participants, sedentary behavior was decreased stepwise relative to C in SRGI (d = -0.73, p = 0.004) > LBGI (d = -0.59, p = 0.04) > LS (d = -0.41, p = 0.07), and moderate + vigorous physical activity was increased in SRGI (d = 0.58, p = 0.001). Among adherent participants, the HEI was increased in LS and SRGI, and glycemic index reduced in LBGI. Conclusions: While ITT analysis was negative, among adherent participants, the Imagine HEALTH lifestyle intervention improved eating habits, reduced sedentary activity, and increased physical activity, suggesting that GI may amplify the role of lifestyle education alone for some key outcomes. Clinical Trials.gov ID: NCT02088294.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Paradigm, Practice, and Policy Advancing Integrative Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal providing scientific research for the evaluation and integration of complementary and alternative medicine into mainstream medical practice. The Journal delivers original research that directly impacts patient care therapies, protocols, and strategies, ultimately improving the quality of healing.
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine coverage includes:
-Botanical Medicine
-Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine
-Other Traditional Medicine Practices
-Mind-Body Medicine
-Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
-Integrative Health / Medicine
-Yoga
-Ayurveda
-Naturopathy
-Creative Arts Therapies
-Integrative Whole Systems / Whole Practices
-Homeopathy
-Tai Chi
-Qi Gong
-Massage Therapy
-Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine
-Integrative Cost Studies / Comparative Effectiveness
-Neurostimulation
-Integrative Biophysics