Pallavi Surana, Julian Hercun, Varun Takyar, David E Kleiner, Theo Heller, Christopher Koh
{"title":"血小板计数作为慢性病毒性肝炎代偿性肝硬化的筛查工具。","authors":"Pallavi Surana, Julian Hercun, Varun Takyar, David E Kleiner, Theo Heller, Christopher Koh","doi":"10.4291/wjgp.v12.i3.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simple tools for clinicians to identify cirrhosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis are medically necessary for treatment initiation, hepatocellular cancer screening and additional medical management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether platelets or other laboratory markers can be used as a simple method to identify the development of cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical, biochemical and histologic laboratory data from treatment naive chronic viral hepatitis B (HBV), C (HCV), and D (HDV) patients at the NIH Clinical Center from 1985-2019 were collected and subjects were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Laboratory markers were tested for their ability to identify cirrhosis (Ishak ≥ 5) using receiver operating characteristic curves and an optimal cut-off was calculated within the training cohort. The final cut-off was tested within the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1027 subjects (HCV = 701, HBV = 240 and HDV = 86), 66% male, with mean (standard deviation) age of 45 (11) years were evaluated. Within the training cohort (<i>n</i> = 715), platelets performed the best at identifying cirrhosis compared to other laboratory markers [Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC) = 0.86 (0.82-0.90)] and sensitivity 77%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 44%, and negative predictive value 95%. All other tested markers had AUROCs ≤ 0.77. The optimal platelet cut-off for detecting cirrhosis in the training cohort was 143 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L and it performed equally well in the validation cohort (<i>n</i> = 312) [AUROC = 0.85 (0.76-0.94)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of platelet counts should be considered to identify cirrhosis and ensure optimal care and management of patients with chronic viral hepatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23760,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology","volume":"12 3","pages":"40-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/29/WJGP-12-40.PMC8160599.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet count as a screening tool for compensated cirrhosis in chronic viral hepatitis.\",\"authors\":\"Pallavi Surana, Julian Hercun, Varun Takyar, David E Kleiner, Theo Heller, Christopher Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.4291/wjgp.v12.i3.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simple tools for clinicians to identify cirrhosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis are medically necessary for treatment initiation, hepatocellular cancer screening and additional medical management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine whether platelets or other laboratory markers can be used as a simple method to identify the development of cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical, biochemical and histologic laboratory data from treatment naive chronic viral hepatitis B (HBV), C (HCV), and D (HDV) patients at the NIH Clinical Center from 1985-2019 were collected and subjects were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Laboratory markers were tested for their ability to identify cirrhosis (Ishak ≥ 5) using receiver operating characteristic curves and an optimal cut-off was calculated within the training cohort. The final cut-off was tested within the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1027 subjects (HCV = 701, HBV = 240 and HDV = 86), 66% male, with mean (standard deviation) age of 45 (11) years were evaluated. Within the training cohort (<i>n</i> = 715), platelets performed the best at identifying cirrhosis compared to other laboratory markers [Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC) = 0.86 (0.82-0.90)] and sensitivity 77%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 44%, and negative predictive value 95%. All other tested markers had AUROCs ≤ 0.77. The optimal platelet cut-off for detecting cirrhosis in the training cohort was 143 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L and it performed equally well in the validation cohort (<i>n</i> = 312) [AUROC = 0.85 (0.76-0.94)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of platelet counts should be considered to identify cirrhosis and ensure optimal care and management of patients with chronic viral hepatitis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"40-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/38/29/WJGP-12-40.PMC8160599.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v12.i3.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v12.i3.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Platelet count as a screening tool for compensated cirrhosis in chronic viral hepatitis.
Background: Simple tools for clinicians to identify cirrhosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis are medically necessary for treatment initiation, hepatocellular cancer screening and additional medical management.
Aim: To determine whether platelets or other laboratory markers can be used as a simple method to identify the development of cirrhosis.
Methods: Clinical, biochemical and histologic laboratory data from treatment naive chronic viral hepatitis B (HBV), C (HCV), and D (HDV) patients at the NIH Clinical Center from 1985-2019 were collected and subjects were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Laboratory markers were tested for their ability to identify cirrhosis (Ishak ≥ 5) using receiver operating characteristic curves and an optimal cut-off was calculated within the training cohort. The final cut-off was tested within the validation cohort.
Results: Overall, 1027 subjects (HCV = 701, HBV = 240 and HDV = 86), 66% male, with mean (standard deviation) age of 45 (11) years were evaluated. Within the training cohort (n = 715), platelets performed the best at identifying cirrhosis compared to other laboratory markers [Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics curve (AUROC) = 0.86 (0.82-0.90)] and sensitivity 77%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 44%, and negative predictive value 95%. All other tested markers had AUROCs ≤ 0.77. The optimal platelet cut-off for detecting cirrhosis in the training cohort was 143 × 109/L and it performed equally well in the validation cohort (n = 312) [AUROC = 0.85 (0.76-0.94)].
Conclusion: The use of platelet counts should be considered to identify cirrhosis and ensure optimal care and management of patients with chronic viral hepatitis.