工业化学品异丙烯的遗传毒性研究进展

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108364
B. Bhaskar Gollapudi , Amy L. Williams, James S. Bus
{"title":"工业化学品异丙烯的遗传毒性研究进展","authors":"B. Bhaskar Gollapudi ,&nbsp;Amy L. Williams,&nbsp;James S. Bus","doi":"10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature on the genotoxicity of cumene (CAS # 98−82-8) and to assess the role of mutagenicity, if any, in the mode of action for cumene-induced rodent tumors. The studies reviewed included microbial mutagenicity, DNA damage/ repair, cytogenetic effects, and gene mutations. In reviewing these studies, attention was paid to their conformance to applicable OECD test guidelines which are considered as internationally recognized standards for performing these assays. Cumene was not a bacterial mutagen and did not induce <em>Hprt</em> mutations in CHO cell cultures. In the primary rat hepatocyte cultures, cumene induced unscheduled DNA synthesis in one study but this response could not be reproduced in an independent study using a similar protocol. In a study that is not fully compliant to the current OECD guideline, no increase in chromosomal aberrations was observed in CHO cells treated with cumene. The weight of the evidence (WoE) from multiple <em>in vivo</em> studies indicates that cumene is not a clastogen or aneugen. The weak positive response in an <em>in vivo</em> comet assay in the rat liver and mouse lung tissues is of questionable significance due to several study deficiencies. The genotoxicity profile of cumene does not match that of a classic DNA-reactive molecule and the available data does not support a conclusion that cumene is an <em>in vivo</em> mutagen. As such, mutagenicity does not appear to be an early key event in cumene-induced rodent tumors and alternate hypothesized non-mutagenic modes-of-action are presented. Further data are necessary to rule in or rule out a particular MoA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49789,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research","volume":"787 ","pages":"Article 108364"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108364","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of the genotoxicity of the industrial chemical cumene\",\"authors\":\"B. Bhaskar Gollapudi ,&nbsp;Amy L. Williams,&nbsp;James S. Bus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature on the genotoxicity of cumene (CAS # 98−82-8) and to assess the role of mutagenicity, if any, in the mode of action for cumene-induced rodent tumors. The studies reviewed included microbial mutagenicity, DNA damage/ repair, cytogenetic effects, and gene mutations. In reviewing these studies, attention was paid to their conformance to applicable OECD test guidelines which are considered as internationally recognized standards for performing these assays. Cumene was not a bacterial mutagen and did not induce <em>Hprt</em> mutations in CHO cell cultures. In the primary rat hepatocyte cultures, cumene induced unscheduled DNA synthesis in one study but this response could not be reproduced in an independent study using a similar protocol. In a study that is not fully compliant to the current OECD guideline, no increase in chromosomal aberrations was observed in CHO cells treated with cumene. The weight of the evidence (WoE) from multiple <em>in vivo</em> studies indicates that cumene is not a clastogen or aneugen. The weak positive response in an <em>in vivo</em> comet assay in the rat liver and mouse lung tissues is of questionable significance due to several study deficiencies. The genotoxicity profile of cumene does not match that of a classic DNA-reactive molecule and the available data does not support a conclusion that cumene is an <em>in vivo</em> mutagen. As such, mutagenicity does not appear to be an early key event in cumene-induced rodent tumors and alternate hypothesized non-mutagenic modes-of-action are presented. Further data are necessary to rule in or rule out a particular MoA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research\",\"volume\":\"787 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108364\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383574221000016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research-Reviews in Mutation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383574221000016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本综述的目的是评估有关异丙苯遗传毒性的文献(CAS # 98−82-8),并评估致突变性在异丙苯诱导的啮齿动物肿瘤的作用模式中的作用(如果有的话)。综述的研究包括微生物诱变性、DNA损伤/修复、细胞遗传学效应和基因突变。在审查这些研究时,注意到它们是否符合经合发组织适用的测试准则,这些准则被认为是进行这些测定的国际公认标准。Cumene不是细菌诱变剂,也不会在CHO细胞培养中诱导Hprt突变。在原代大鼠肝细胞培养中,在一项研究中,异丙苯诱导了计划外的DNA合成,但这种反应不能在使用类似方案的独立研究中重现。在一项不完全符合当前OECD指南的研究中,用异丙烯处理的CHO细胞没有观察到染色体畸变的增加。来自多个体内研究的证据权重(WoE)表明,异丙苯不是一种破胚剂或新生物。由于一些研究缺陷,在大鼠肝脏和小鼠肺组织的体内彗星试验中弱阳性反应的意义值得怀疑。异丙苯的遗传毒性与经典的dna反应分子不一致,现有的数据也不支持异丙苯是体内诱变剂的结论。因此,致突变性似乎不是异丙苯诱导的啮齿动物肿瘤的早期关键事件,并提出了其他假设的非致突变性作用模式。需要进一步的数据来确定或排除特定的MoA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A review of the genotoxicity of the industrial chemical cumene

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature on the genotoxicity of cumene (CAS # 98−82-8) and to assess the role of mutagenicity, if any, in the mode of action for cumene-induced rodent tumors. The studies reviewed included microbial mutagenicity, DNA damage/ repair, cytogenetic effects, and gene mutations. In reviewing these studies, attention was paid to their conformance to applicable OECD test guidelines which are considered as internationally recognized standards for performing these assays. Cumene was not a bacterial mutagen and did not induce Hprt mutations in CHO cell cultures. In the primary rat hepatocyte cultures, cumene induced unscheduled DNA synthesis in one study but this response could not be reproduced in an independent study using a similar protocol. In a study that is not fully compliant to the current OECD guideline, no increase in chromosomal aberrations was observed in CHO cells treated with cumene. The weight of the evidence (WoE) from multiple in vivo studies indicates that cumene is not a clastogen or aneugen. The weak positive response in an in vivo comet assay in the rat liver and mouse lung tissues is of questionable significance due to several study deficiencies. The genotoxicity profile of cumene does not match that of a classic DNA-reactive molecule and the available data does not support a conclusion that cumene is an in vivo mutagen. As such, mutagenicity does not appear to be an early key event in cumene-induced rodent tumors and alternate hypothesized non-mutagenic modes-of-action are presented. Further data are necessary to rule in or rule out a particular MoA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.90%
发文量
22
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The subject areas of Reviews in Mutation Research encompass the entire spectrum of the science of mutation research and its applications, with particular emphasis on the relationship between mutation and disease. Thus this section will cover advances in human genome research (including evolving technologies for mutation detection and functional genomics) with applications in clinical genetics, gene therapy and health risk assessment for environmental agents of concern.
期刊最新文献
Emerging pollutants in the aquatic environments: A review of genotoxic impacts State of art of micronuclei assay in exfoliative cytology as a clinical biomarker of genetic damage in oral carcinogenesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis A critical review of the impact of candidate copy number variants on autism spectrum disorder Use of micronucleus cytome assays with buccal cells for the detection of genotoxic effects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of occupational exposures to metals Genome-scale mutational signature analysis in fixed archived tissues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1