癌症患者动脉僵硬度与心血管和癌症死亡率相关:来自NHANESIII的见解

Shannon K. Parr , Catherine C. Steele , Stephen T. Hammond , Vanessa Rose G. Turpin , Carl J. Ade
{"title":"癌症患者动脉僵硬度与心血管和癌症死亡率相关:来自NHANESIII的见解","authors":"Shannon K. Parr ,&nbsp;Catherine C. Steele ,&nbsp;Stephen T. Hammond ,&nbsp;Vanessa Rose G. Turpin ,&nbsp;Carl J. Ade","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cancer survivors are at greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than second malignancy, resulting in a decreased quality of life and increased cost of care. Additional knowledge of CVD prevention by identifying possible risk factors has clinical relevance. Our main objective was to determine the relevance of a clinical index of arterial stiffness, pulse pressure, in predicting CVD mortality in cancer patients, with a second objective to examine its relationship with cancer mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed 781 cancer patients from Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Linked Mortality File, including demographic, anthropometric, blood pressure, and cause of death. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox hazard regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between pulse pressure and cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During a mean follow-up time of 8.1 years, 603 deaths, 257 cancer and 151 CVD, occurred. In unadjusted models, the risk of CVD, cancer, and all-cause mortality were 3.8-fold, 5.3-fold, and 1.6-fold higher, respectively, for pulse pressure ≥70 ​mmHg compared to &lt;50 ​mmHg. Adjusted analyses revealed a higher CVD mortality in cancer patients &lt;65 years with a pulse pressure 60–70 ​mmHg (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.26; 95%CI, 1.12–24.78) when compared to pulse pressure of &lt;50 ​mmHg. Pulse pressure was not associated with risk of all-cause, CVD, or cancer in those ≥65 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pulse pressure, an index of arterial stiffness, is predictive of CVD mortality in cancer patients. Our findings support non-invasive office-setting measurements of arterial stiffness to identify high risk patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100085","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arterial stiffness is associated with cardiovascular and cancer mortality in cancer patients: Insight from NHANESIII\",\"authors\":\"Shannon K. Parr ,&nbsp;Catherine C. Steele ,&nbsp;Stephen T. Hammond ,&nbsp;Vanessa Rose G. Turpin ,&nbsp;Carl J. Ade\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cancer survivors are at greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than second malignancy, resulting in a decreased quality of life and increased cost of care. Additional knowledge of CVD prevention by identifying possible risk factors has clinical relevance. Our main objective was to determine the relevance of a clinical index of arterial stiffness, pulse pressure, in predicting CVD mortality in cancer patients, with a second objective to examine its relationship with cancer mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively analyzed 781 cancer patients from Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Linked Mortality File, including demographic, anthropometric, blood pressure, and cause of death. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox hazard regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between pulse pressure and cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During a mean follow-up time of 8.1 years, 603 deaths, 257 cancer and 151 CVD, occurred. In unadjusted models, the risk of CVD, cancer, and all-cause mortality were 3.8-fold, 5.3-fold, and 1.6-fold higher, respectively, for pulse pressure ≥70 ​mmHg compared to &lt;50 ​mmHg. Adjusted analyses revealed a higher CVD mortality in cancer patients &lt;65 years with a pulse pressure 60–70 ​mmHg (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.26; 95%CI, 1.12–24.78) when compared to pulse pressure of &lt;50 ​mmHg. Pulse pressure was not associated with risk of all-cause, CVD, or cancer in those ≥65 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Pulse pressure, an index of arterial stiffness, is predictive of CVD mortality in cancer patients. Our findings support non-invasive office-setting measurements of arterial stiffness to identify high risk patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2021.100085\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590086221000100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590086221000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

癌症幸存者患心血管疾病(CVD)的风险高于第二恶性肿瘤,导致生活质量下降和护理成本增加。通过识别可能的危险因素来预防心血管疾病的额外知识具有临床意义。我们的主要目的是确定动脉硬度、脉压的临床指标在预测癌症患者心血管疾病死亡率中的相关性,第二个目的是研究其与癌症死亡率的关系。方法回顾性分析第三次全国健康与营养调查和相关死亡率档案中781例癌症患者的人口学、人体测量学、血压和死亡原因。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Cox风险回归分析评估脉压与心血管、癌症和全因死亡率之间的关系。结果平均随访8.1年,死亡603人,癌症257人,心血管疾病151人。在未调整的模型中,与50 mmHg相比,脉压≥70 mmHg的心血管疾病、癌症和全因死亡的风险分别高出3.8倍、5.3倍和1.6倍。校正分析显示,脉搏压在60-70 mmHg的65岁以上癌症患者心血管疾病死亡率较高(校正风险比5.26;95%CI, 1.12-24.78),与50 mmHg的脉压相比。在≥65岁的人群中,脉压与全因、心血管疾病或癌症风险无关。结论脉压作为动脉僵硬度的指标,可预测癌症患者的心血管疾病死亡率。我们的研究结果支持非侵入性办公室设置测量动脉僵硬来识别高风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Arterial stiffness is associated with cardiovascular and cancer mortality in cancer patients: Insight from NHANESIII

Background

Cancer survivors are at greater risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than second malignancy, resulting in a decreased quality of life and increased cost of care. Additional knowledge of CVD prevention by identifying possible risk factors has clinical relevance. Our main objective was to determine the relevance of a clinical index of arterial stiffness, pulse pressure, in predicting CVD mortality in cancer patients, with a second objective to examine its relationship with cancer mortality.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 781 cancer patients from Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Linked Mortality File, including demographic, anthropometric, blood pressure, and cause of death. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox hazard regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between pulse pressure and cardiovascular, cancer, and all-cause mortality.

Results

During a mean follow-up time of 8.1 years, 603 deaths, 257 cancer and 151 CVD, occurred. In unadjusted models, the risk of CVD, cancer, and all-cause mortality were 3.8-fold, 5.3-fold, and 1.6-fold higher, respectively, for pulse pressure ≥70 ​mmHg compared to <50 ​mmHg. Adjusted analyses revealed a higher CVD mortality in cancer patients <65 years with a pulse pressure 60–70 ​mmHg (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.26; 95%CI, 1.12–24.78) when compared to pulse pressure of <50 ​mmHg. Pulse pressure was not associated with risk of all-cause, CVD, or cancer in those ≥65 years.

Conclusion

Pulse pressure, an index of arterial stiffness, is predictive of CVD mortality in cancer patients. Our findings support non-invasive office-setting measurements of arterial stiffness to identify high risk patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 morbidity and mortality associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers use among 14,129 patients with hypertension from a US integrated healthcare system Reduced global longitudinal strain at rest and inadequate blood pressure response during exercise treadmill testing in male heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients Association of family history with incidence and gestational hypertension outcomes of preeclampsia Critical questions in cardiovascular risk: What nutrition labels should be used on food? Why is salt-sensitivity of blood pressure, a known cardiovascular risk factor, not treated?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1