一个孩子能接受多少测试?收集儿科患者神经心理学和心理评估经验评分的可行性。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Applied Neuropsychology: Child Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-08 DOI:10.1080/21622965.2021.1917410
Erin F Jones, Alison Pritchard, Lisa A Jacobson, E Mark Mahone, T Andrew Zabel
{"title":"一个孩子能接受多少测试?收集儿科患者神经心理学和心理评估经验评分的可行性。","authors":"Erin F Jones,&nbsp;Alison Pritchard,&nbsp;Lisa A Jacobson,&nbsp;E Mark Mahone,&nbsp;T Andrew Zabel","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2021.1917410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parent-reported satisfaction is an important outcome measure in pediatric neuropsychology; however, self-report of patient experience following lengthy pediatric assessments has been under-investigated. Written at a first grade reading level and utilizing touch screen and read-aloud functionality, a set of 15 operationally-focused items were administered to evaluate pediatric patient experience of neuropsychological and psychological assessment. One-hundred ninety-seven clinically-referred patients (M age = 11.74, SD = 3.17, range = 5.86-19.02 years, 56% male) answered the post-assessment survey. The majority of patients (<i>n</i> = 167; 84.77%) accurately completed the initial two validity items, even though many had parent-reported ratings of reading difficulty. More than a third of patients indicated that the assessment made them tired (39%), but fewer patients reported feeling bored (13%) or worried (7%) during testing. Moreover, most patients reported having fun (66%) and many indicated that testing was preferable to other activities typically performed at that same time (i.e., school, homework). Responses to items assessing the child's interactions with the clinician and the child's effort provided little variation and were answered in a socially desirable manner. Items that focused upon the child's personal response to the assessment appointment (e.g., boredom, worry), however, elicited greater variance in patient responding. In general, patient responses did not suggest that assessment was an aversive experience. Overall, these proof of concept findings suggest that most referred pediatric patients, even those with learning issues, may be capable of independently navigating and completing self-report questionnaires while providing differential responses to items assessing clinical experience. Self-report questionnaires appear to be a feasible method for acquiring pediatric patient-reported experiences of assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":"11 4","pages":"610-617"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21622965.2021.1917410","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How much testing can a kid take? Feasibility of collecting pediatric patient experience ratings of neuropsychological and psychological assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Erin F Jones,&nbsp;Alison Pritchard,&nbsp;Lisa A Jacobson,&nbsp;E Mark Mahone,&nbsp;T Andrew Zabel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21622965.2021.1917410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Parent-reported satisfaction is an important outcome measure in pediatric neuropsychology; however, self-report of patient experience following lengthy pediatric assessments has been under-investigated. Written at a first grade reading level and utilizing touch screen and read-aloud functionality, a set of 15 operationally-focused items were administered to evaluate pediatric patient experience of neuropsychological and psychological assessment. One-hundred ninety-seven clinically-referred patients (M age = 11.74, SD = 3.17, range = 5.86-19.02 years, 56% male) answered the post-assessment survey. The majority of patients (<i>n</i> = 167; 84.77%) accurately completed the initial two validity items, even though many had parent-reported ratings of reading difficulty. More than a third of patients indicated that the assessment made them tired (39%), but fewer patients reported feeling bored (13%) or worried (7%) during testing. Moreover, most patients reported having fun (66%) and many indicated that testing was preferable to other activities typically performed at that same time (i.e., school, homework). Responses to items assessing the child's interactions with the clinician and the child's effort provided little variation and were answered in a socially desirable manner. Items that focused upon the child's personal response to the assessment appointment (e.g., boredom, worry), however, elicited greater variance in patient responding. In general, patient responses did not suggest that assessment was an aversive experience. Overall, these proof of concept findings suggest that most referred pediatric patients, even those with learning issues, may be capable of independently navigating and completing self-report questionnaires while providing differential responses to items assessing clinical experience. Self-report questionnaires appear to be a feasible method for acquiring pediatric patient-reported experiences of assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"610-617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21622965.2021.1917410\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology: Child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1917410\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1917410","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

父母报告的满意度是儿童神经心理学中重要的结果测量指标;然而,长期儿科评估后患者经验的自我报告尚未得到充分调查。以一年级阅读水平书写,使用触摸屏和大声朗读功能,一套15个以手术为重点的项目来评估儿科患者的神经心理学和心理评估体验。197例临床转诊患者(M年龄= 11.74,SD = 3.17,范围= 5.86-19.02岁,56%为男性)接受了评估后调查。大多数患者(n = 167;84.77%)准确地完成了最初的两个效度项目,尽管许多人都有父母报告的阅读困难评分。超过三分之一的患者表示评估使他们感到疲倦(39%),但较少的患者报告在测试期间感到无聊(13%)或担心(7%)。此外,大多数患者报告说他们玩得很开心(66%),许多人表示测试比通常在同一时间进行的其他活动(即学校,家庭作业)更可取。对评估儿童与临床医生的互动和儿童努力的项目的回答几乎没有变化,并且以社会期望的方式回答。然而,关注儿童对评估预约的个人反应的项目(例如,无聊,担心)在患者的反应中引起了更大的差异。总的来说,患者的反应并不表明评估是一种厌恶的经历。总的来说,这些概念证明的发现表明,大多数转诊的儿科患者,即使是那些有学习问题的患者,可能能够独立导航和完成自我报告问卷,同时对评估临床经验的项目提供不同的回答。自我报告问卷似乎是一种可行的方法,以获取儿科患者报告的评估经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How much testing can a kid take? Feasibility of collecting pediatric patient experience ratings of neuropsychological and psychological assessment.

Parent-reported satisfaction is an important outcome measure in pediatric neuropsychology; however, self-report of patient experience following lengthy pediatric assessments has been under-investigated. Written at a first grade reading level and utilizing touch screen and read-aloud functionality, a set of 15 operationally-focused items were administered to evaluate pediatric patient experience of neuropsychological and psychological assessment. One-hundred ninety-seven clinically-referred patients (M age = 11.74, SD = 3.17, range = 5.86-19.02 years, 56% male) answered the post-assessment survey. The majority of patients (n = 167; 84.77%) accurately completed the initial two validity items, even though many had parent-reported ratings of reading difficulty. More than a third of patients indicated that the assessment made them tired (39%), but fewer patients reported feeling bored (13%) or worried (7%) during testing. Moreover, most patients reported having fun (66%) and many indicated that testing was preferable to other activities typically performed at that same time (i.e., school, homework). Responses to items assessing the child's interactions with the clinician and the child's effort provided little variation and were answered in a socially desirable manner. Items that focused upon the child's personal response to the assessment appointment (e.g., boredom, worry), however, elicited greater variance in patient responding. In general, patient responses did not suggest that assessment was an aversive experience. Overall, these proof of concept findings suggest that most referred pediatric patients, even those with learning issues, may be capable of independently navigating and completing self-report questionnaires while providing differential responses to items assessing clinical experience. Self-report questionnaires appear to be a feasible method for acquiring pediatric patient-reported experiences of assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Differential diagnosis: Understanding nonverbal learning disorder and autism spectrum disorder. Chanting and meditation: an 8-week intervention to promote executive functions in school-age children. About the relationship between executive function, theory of mind, and language abilities in children with autism: a systematic review. Cognitive profiles and developmental variations in ADHD: A comparative analysis of childhood and adolescent diagnoses. A novel approach to ADHD classification based on severity and emotional impairment: Findings from artificial intelligence analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1