非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂治疗静脉血栓栓塞的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。

JRSM Open Pub Date : 2021-06-13 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1177/20542704211010686
Yan Zhuang, Lin-Feng Dai, Ming-Qi Chen
{"title":"非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂治疗静脉血栓栓塞的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Yan Zhuang,&nbsp;Lin-Feng Dai,&nbsp;Ming-Qi Chen","doi":"10.1177/20542704211010686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several trials had compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin for acute venous thromboembolism, but the results were incomplete. This updated review comprehensively assessed the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Six databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2018.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Adult patients had got non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or warfarin for venous thromboembolism.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Randomised control trials that compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies involving 29,879 cases were included, among which 14,943 cases were assigned to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group and 14,936 cases to warfarin group. Meta-analysis showed that compared with warfarin, recurrent venous thromboembolism (odds ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.11]), death related to venous thromboembolism or fatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.00 [95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.60]), symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (odds ratio 0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.09]), symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.03 [(95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.30]) and all deaths (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.12]) are similar in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group, but major bleeding event (odds ratio 0.61 [95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.75]) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding event (odds ratio [95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.85]) are less in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group. .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For the treatment of venous thromboembolism, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is as effective as warfarin, and has a better safety profile than warfarin.</p>","PeriodicalId":17674,"journal":{"name":"JRSM Open","volume":"12 6","pages":"20542704211010686"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20542704211010686","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zhuang,&nbsp;Lin-Feng Dai,&nbsp;Ming-Qi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20542704211010686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several trials had compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin for acute venous thromboembolism, but the results were incomplete. This updated review comprehensively assessed the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Six databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2018.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Adult patients had got non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or warfarin for venous thromboembolism.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Randomised control trials that compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies involving 29,879 cases were included, among which 14,943 cases were assigned to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group and 14,936 cases to warfarin group. Meta-analysis showed that compared with warfarin, recurrent venous thromboembolism (odds ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.11]), death related to venous thromboembolism or fatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.00 [95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.60]), symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (odds ratio 0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.09]), symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.03 [(95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.30]) and all deaths (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.12]) are similar in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group, but major bleeding event (odds ratio 0.61 [95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.75]) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding event (odds ratio [95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.85]) are less in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group. .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For the treatment of venous thromboembolism, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is as effective as warfarin, and has a better safety profile than warfarin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM Open\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"20542704211010686\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/20542704211010686\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704211010686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20542704211010686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:一些试验比较了非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗急性静脉血栓栓塞的疗效和安全性,但结果不完整。这篇最新的综述全面评估了非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂治疗静脉血栓栓塞的疗效和安全性。设计:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。从2000年1月到2018年12月,对六个数据库进行了检索。背景:成人静脉血栓栓塞患者服用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂或华法林。参与者:随机对照试验,比较非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂和华法林的疗效和安全性。主要观察指标:非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的疗效和安全性。结果:纳入7项研究,共29879例,其中非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂组14943例,华法林组14936例。荟萃分析显示,与华法林相比,复发性静脉血栓栓塞(优势比0.94[95%可信区间0.81 ~ 1.11])、与静脉血栓栓塞或致死性肺栓塞相关的死亡(优势比1.00[95%可信区间0.63 ~ 1.60])、症状性深静脉血栓形成(优势比0.88[95%可信区间0.72 ~ 1.09])、非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂组的症状性非致死性肺栓塞(优势比1.03[(95%置信区间0.82 ~ 1.30])和所有死亡(优势比0.92[95%置信区间0.76 ~ 1.12])相似,但非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂组的大出血事件(优势比0.61[95%置信区间0.50 ~ 0.75])和临床相关的非大出血事件(优势比[95%置信区间0.53 ~ 0.85])较少。结论:非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝治疗静脉血栓栓塞与华法林疗效相当,且安全性优于华法林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis.

Objective: Several trials had compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin for acute venous thromboembolism, but the results were incomplete. This updated review comprehensively assessed the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism.

Design: Meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Six databases were searched from January 2000 to December 2018.

Setting: Adult patients had got non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or warfarin for venous thromboembolism.

Participants: Randomised control trials that compared the efficacy and safety between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin.

Main outcome measures: The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants .

Results: Seven studies involving 29,879 cases were included, among which 14,943 cases were assigned to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group and 14,936 cases to warfarin group. Meta-analysis showed that compared with warfarin, recurrent venous thromboembolism (odds ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.11]), death related to venous thromboembolism or fatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.00 [95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.60]), symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (odds ratio 0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.09]), symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism (odds ratio 1.03 [(95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.30]) and all deaths (odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.12]) are similar in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group, but major bleeding event (odds ratio 0.61 [95% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.75]) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding event (odds ratio [95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.85]) are less in non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants group. .

Conclusions: For the treatment of venous thromboembolism, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is as effective as warfarin, and has a better safety profile than warfarin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JRSM Open is a peer reviewed online-only journal that follows the open-access publishing model. It is a companion journal to the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. The journal publishes research papers, research letters, clinical and methodological reviews, and case reports. Our aim is to inform practice and policy making in clinical medicine. The journal has an international and multispecialty readership that includes primary care and public health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Providing personalised care for people with tuberculosis: an evaluation of enhanced case management in a UK TB Network 2013 to 2021. Redeployment experiences of healthcare workers in the UK during COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis from the nationwide UK-REACH study. Surgical reconstruction for spasticity and contracture: An underutilised rehabilitative strategy of adult stroke. Long COVID symptoms and demographic associations: A retrospective case series study using healthcare application data. Racial microaggressions within the UK Healthcare System: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1