大流行的印度:冠状病毒和历史的使用。

IF 1.3 1区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Asian Studies Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1017/S0021911820002272
David Arnold
{"title":"大流行的印度:冠状病毒和历史的使用。","authors":"David Arnold","doi":"10.1017/S0021911820002272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has produced two different narratives in India. One, here described as \"historical,\" looks back to the pandemics of the colonial past-bubonic plague from 1896, influenza in 1918-19-as a source of comparisons, lessons, and dire warnings for the present. This narrative envisages the reenactment of past scenes, including flight from the cities, victimization of the poor, and the questioning of state authority. The other narrative, here called \"insurgent,\" questions the value of historical analogies, doubts that history ever substantially repeats itself, and stresses the specificity of postcolonial Indian politics and health. While recognizing the validity of both narratives, the author urges caution in employing colonial history to critique contemporary events and, while recognizing the 1890s plague as a watershed moment, questions whether even the most devastating pandemics (such as 1918's influenza) necessarily result in profound social, political, and health care changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47551,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian Studies","volume":"79 3","pages":"569-577"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0021911820002272","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandemic India: Coronavirus and the Uses of History.\",\"authors\":\"David Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0021911820002272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has produced two different narratives in India. One, here described as \\\"historical,\\\" looks back to the pandemics of the colonial past-bubonic plague from 1896, influenza in 1918-19-as a source of comparisons, lessons, and dire warnings for the present. This narrative envisages the reenactment of past scenes, including flight from the cities, victimization of the poor, and the questioning of state authority. The other narrative, here called \\\"insurgent,\\\" questions the value of historical analogies, doubts that history ever substantially repeats itself, and stresses the specificity of postcolonial Indian politics and health. While recognizing the validity of both narratives, the author urges caution in employing colonial history to critique contemporary events and, while recognizing the 1890s plague as a watershed moment, questions whether even the most devastating pandemics (such as 1918's influenza) necessarily result in profound social, political, and health care changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asian Studies\",\"volume\":\"79 3\",\"pages\":\"569-577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0021911820002272\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911820002272\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911820002272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

COVID-19大流行的爆发在印度产生了两种不同的说法。其一,这里被称为“历史性的”,回顾过去殖民时期的大流行——1896年的黑死病,1918- 1919年的流感——作为比较、教训和对现在的可怕警告的来源。这种叙事设想了过去场景的重演,包括逃离城市,穷人受害,以及对国家权威的质疑。另一种叙事,在这里被称为“叛乱”,质疑历史类比的价值,怀疑历史是否会基本上重复自己,并强调后殖民印度政治和健康的特殊性。在承认这两种叙述的正确性的同时,作者敦促在使用殖民历史来批判当代事件时要谨慎,在承认19世纪90年代的瘟疫是一个分水岭的同时,质疑即使是最具破坏性的流行病(如1918年的流感)是否也一定会导致深刻的社会、政治和医疗变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pandemic India: Coronavirus and the Uses of History.

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has produced two different narratives in India. One, here described as "historical," looks back to the pandemics of the colonial past-bubonic plague from 1896, influenza in 1918-19-as a source of comparisons, lessons, and dire warnings for the present. This narrative envisages the reenactment of past scenes, including flight from the cities, victimization of the poor, and the questioning of state authority. The other narrative, here called "insurgent," questions the value of historical analogies, doubts that history ever substantially repeats itself, and stresses the specificity of postcolonial Indian politics and health. While recognizing the validity of both narratives, the author urges caution in employing colonial history to critique contemporary events and, while recognizing the 1890s plague as a watershed moment, questions whether even the most devastating pandemics (such as 1918's influenza) necessarily result in profound social, political, and health care changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
193
期刊介绍: The Journal of Asian Studies (JAS) has played a defining role in the field of Asian studies for over 65 years. JAS publishes the very best empirical and multidisciplinary work on Asia, spanning the arts, history, literature, the social sciences, and cultural studies. Experts around the world turn to this quarterly journal for the latest in-depth scholarship on Asia"s past and present, for its extensive book reviews, and for its state-of-the-field essays on established and emerging topics. With coverage reaching from South and Southeast Asia to China, Inner Asia, and Northeast Asia, JAS welcomes broad comparative and transnational studies as well as essays emanating from fine-grained historical, cultural, political, or literary research and interpretation.
期刊最新文献
The Wa of Myanmar and China's Quest for Global Dominance Accidental Holy Land: The Communist Revolution in Northwest China The Many Lives of the First Emperor of China The Culture of Language in Ming China: Sound, Script, and the Redefinition of Boundaries of Knowledge Foreign Banks and Global Finance in Modern China: Banking on the Chinese Frontier, 1870–1919
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1