使用肝素锁定的隧道式透析导管测量血液透析患者国际正常化比率的新方法。

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2020-12-22 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/7586437
Céline B Seghers, Kristien Ver Elst, Jolien Claessens, Steven Weekx, Sigrid Vermeiren, Manu Henckes
{"title":"使用肝素锁定的隧道式透析导管测量血液透析患者国际正常化比率的新方法。","authors":"Céline B Seghers, Kristien Ver Elst, Jolien Claessens, Steven Weekx, Sigrid Vermeiren, Manu Henckes","doi":"10.1155/2020/7586437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To measure International Normalized Ratio (INR) in hemodialysis patients with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs), blood sampling is frequently obtained via the catheter at the start of the session. INR measurements via finger-prick point of care testing (POCT) and via blood sampling taken from the dialysis circuit are evaluated as alternatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 14 hemodialysis patients with TDCs, treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), INR measurements via POCT were compared with plasma INR samples taken via the catheter at the start of dialysis and via the dialysis circuit after 30 and 60 minutes during 3 nonconsecutive dialysis sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blood samples taken at the start of dialysis at the catheter site were frequently contaminated with heparin originating from the locking solution (unfractionated heparin concentration (UFH) >1.0 IU/ml in 13.2%). POCT INR at the start of dialysis was not different from plasma INR after 30 and 60 minutes (Wilcoxon test <i>p</i>=0.113, <i>n</i> = 37, and <i>p</i>=0.631, <i>n</i> = 36, respectively). Moreover, there was no difference between POCT INR at the start of dialysis and POCT INR after 30 and 60 minutes (Wilcoxon test <i>p</i>=0.797 and <i>p</i> = 0.801, respectively; <i>n</i> = 36). Passing and Bablok regression equation was used, <i>y</i> = 0.460 + 0.733x; <i>n</i> = 105. Treatment decisions based on these 2 methods showed a very good overall agreement (kappa = 0.810; 95% CI: 0.732-0.889; <i>n</i> = 105).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring plasma INR via the TDC at the start of dialysis should be abandoned. Measuring POCT INR via a finger prick at the start or even after 30 to 60 minutes is an alternative. The most elegant alternative is to take plasma INR samples via the dialysis circuit 30 minutes or later after the start of the dialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14177,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nephrology","volume":"2020 ","pages":"7586437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Method for the Measurement of International Normalized Ratio in Hemodialysis Patients with Heparin-Locked Tunneled Dialysis Catheters.\",\"authors\":\"Céline B Seghers, Kristien Ver Elst, Jolien Claessens, Steven Weekx, Sigrid Vermeiren, Manu Henckes\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/7586437\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To measure International Normalized Ratio (INR) in hemodialysis patients with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs), blood sampling is frequently obtained via the catheter at the start of the session. INR measurements via finger-prick point of care testing (POCT) and via blood sampling taken from the dialysis circuit are evaluated as alternatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 14 hemodialysis patients with TDCs, treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), INR measurements via POCT were compared with plasma INR samples taken via the catheter at the start of dialysis and via the dialysis circuit after 30 and 60 minutes during 3 nonconsecutive dialysis sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Blood samples taken at the start of dialysis at the catheter site were frequently contaminated with heparin originating from the locking solution (unfractionated heparin concentration (UFH) >1.0 IU/ml in 13.2%). POCT INR at the start of dialysis was not different from plasma INR after 30 and 60 minutes (Wilcoxon test <i>p</i>=0.113, <i>n</i> = 37, and <i>p</i>=0.631, <i>n</i> = 36, respectively). Moreover, there was no difference between POCT INR at the start of dialysis and POCT INR after 30 and 60 minutes (Wilcoxon test <i>p</i>=0.797 and <i>p</i> = 0.801, respectively; <i>n</i> = 36). Passing and Bablok regression equation was used, <i>y</i> = 0.460 + 0.733x; <i>n</i> = 105. Treatment decisions based on these 2 methods showed a very good overall agreement (kappa = 0.810; 95% CI: 0.732-0.889; <i>n</i> = 105).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Measuring plasma INR via the TDC at the start of dialysis should be abandoned. Measuring POCT INR via a finger prick at the start or even after 30 to 60 minutes is an alternative. The most elegant alternative is to take plasma INR samples via the dialysis circuit 30 minutes or later after the start of the dialysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"7586437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7586437\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7586437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为测量使用隧道式透析导管(TDC)的血液透析患者的国际正常化比率(INR),通常在透析开始时通过导管采集血液样本。作为替代方法,我们评估了通过指刺护理点检测(POCT)和透析回路采血测量 INR 的效果:方法:在 14 名接受维生素 K 拮抗剂 (VKA) 治疗的 TDC 血液透析患者中,比较了通过 POCT 测量 INR 与透析开始时通过导管采集的血浆 INR 样品,以及在 3 次非连续透析过程中 30 分钟和 60 分钟后通过透析回路采集的血浆 INR 样品:结果:透析开始时在导管部位采集的血样经常受到来自锁定溶液的肝素污染(13.2%的血样中未分馏肝素浓度 (UFH) >1.0 IU/ml)。透析开始时的 POCT INR 与 30 分钟和 60 分钟后的血浆 INR 没有差异(Wilcoxon 检验 p=0.113,n=37;p=0.631,n=36)。此外,透析开始时的 POCT INR 与 30 分钟和 60 分钟后的 POCT INR 没有差异(Wilcoxon 检验 p=0.797 和 p=0.801,n=36)。使用 Passing 和 Bablok 回归方程:y = 0.460 + 0.733x;n = 105。根据这两种方法做出的治疗决定显示出很好的整体一致性(kappa = 0.810;95% CI:0.732-0.889;n = 105):结论:应放弃在透析开始时通过 TDC 测量血浆 INR 的做法。结论:应放弃在透析开始时通过 TDC 测量血浆 INR 的做法,在透析开始时甚至 30 至 60 分钟后通过刺破手指测量 POCT INR 是一种替代方法。最有效的方法是在透析开始后 30 分钟或更晚些时候通过透析回路采集血浆 INR 样品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A New Method for the Measurement of International Normalized Ratio in Hemodialysis Patients with Heparin-Locked Tunneled Dialysis Catheters.

Background: To measure International Normalized Ratio (INR) in hemodialysis patients with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs), blood sampling is frequently obtained via the catheter at the start of the session. INR measurements via finger-prick point of care testing (POCT) and via blood sampling taken from the dialysis circuit are evaluated as alternatives.

Methods: In 14 hemodialysis patients with TDCs, treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), INR measurements via POCT were compared with plasma INR samples taken via the catheter at the start of dialysis and via the dialysis circuit after 30 and 60 minutes during 3 nonconsecutive dialysis sessions.

Results: Blood samples taken at the start of dialysis at the catheter site were frequently contaminated with heparin originating from the locking solution (unfractionated heparin concentration (UFH) >1.0 IU/ml in 13.2%). POCT INR at the start of dialysis was not different from plasma INR after 30 and 60 minutes (Wilcoxon test p=0.113, n = 37, and p=0.631, n = 36, respectively). Moreover, there was no difference between POCT INR at the start of dialysis and POCT INR after 30 and 60 minutes (Wilcoxon test p=0.797 and p = 0.801, respectively; n = 36). Passing and Bablok regression equation was used, y = 0.460 + 0.733x; n = 105. Treatment decisions based on these 2 methods showed a very good overall agreement (kappa = 0.810; 95% CI: 0.732-0.889; n = 105).

Conclusions: Measuring plasma INR via the TDC at the start of dialysis should be abandoned. Measuring POCT INR via a finger prick at the start or even after 30 to 60 minutes is an alternative. The most elegant alternative is to take plasma INR samples via the dialysis circuit 30 minutes or later after the start of the dialysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Nephrology
International Journal of Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nephrology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on the prevention, diagnosis, and management of kidney diseases and associated disorders. The journal welcomes submissions related to cell biology, developmental biology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pathophysiology of renal disease and progression, clinical nephrology, dialysis, and transplantation.
期刊最新文献
Chronic Kidney Disease: Decreasing Serum Klotho Levels Predict Adverse Renal and Vascular Outcomes. Urinary Nephrin: A Potential Biomarker of Early Glomerular Injury in a Cohort of Pregnant Women Attending Routine Antenatal Care Services. Peritoneal Dialysis of Three-Cuff Catheter Experience in Qassim Province, Saudi Arabia. The Protective Activity of Withania somnifera Against Mercuric Chloride (HgCl2)-Induced Renal Toxicity in Male Rats. Key Performance Indicators of Secondary Health Care in Chronic Kidney Disease: Experience in Public and Private Services in the State of São Paulo, Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1