使用11c -胆碱PET/CT定位功能亢进的甲状旁腺:一项观察者之间和内部的变异研究。

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI:10.1186/s41824-021-00108-z
Julie Wulf Christensen, Lars Thorbjørn Jensen, Susanne Bonnichsen Søndergaard, Rikke Broholm, Christian Haarmark, Martin Krakauer, Finn Noe Bennedbæk, Bo Zerahn, Waldemar Trolle, Christoffer Holst Hahn, Bent Kristensen
{"title":"使用11c -胆碱PET/CT定位功能亢进的甲状旁腺:一项观察者之间和内部的变异研究。","authors":"Julie Wulf Christensen,&nbsp;Lars Thorbjørn Jensen,&nbsp;Susanne Bonnichsen Søndergaard,&nbsp;Rikke Broholm,&nbsp;Christian Haarmark,&nbsp;Martin Krakauer,&nbsp;Finn Noe Bennedbæk,&nbsp;Bo Zerahn,&nbsp;Waldemar Trolle,&nbsp;Christoffer Holst Hahn,&nbsp;Bent Kristensen","doi":"10.1186/s41824-021-00108-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of <sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT is gaining ground in detecting hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the robustness of <sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT by assessing intra- and inter-observer agreement to determine whether the method was reader sensitive and therefore should only be performed at highly specialised sites with a high number of cases. PET/CT images of 40 patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism were anonymised and evaluated three times by three readers: an expert reader and two non-experts (non-experts were experienced in PET/CT imaging, but not in <sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT in the setting of primary hyperparathyroidism). Number of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands, location relative to the thyroid gland and confidence of each assessment (low, moderate or high) were noted, and intra- and inter-observer agreement calculated using Fleiss' kappa method. Sensitivities and specificities of the non-experts were calculated using the expert reader as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-observer agreement was 'good' to 'near perfect' for all readers. Inter-observer agreement was good between non-experts and the expert, with kappa values ≥ 0.74. Sensitivities between non-experts and the expert were high, > 81%, when assessing which side and 75% when assessing thyroid quadrant. All specificities were > 94%. Reader certainties were 'high' in > 80% of cases for the expert and > 70% and > 65%, respectively for the two non-experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT is not reader sensitive for the localisation of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands and may therefore be safely implemented at sites that have a moderate number of cases. Access to a cyclotron laboratory is, however, a necessity for the production of <sup>11</sup>C-Choline. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki 2 declaration and The International Council for Harmonisation Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH_GCP) clinical trial, approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (Journal-nr.:H-18012490, date of approval: 18 June 2018) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT no. 2018-000726-63, date of approval: 6 June 2018). The GCP unit in Eastern Denmark has carried out regular monitoring of the trial according to GCP (ID: 2018-1050).</p>","PeriodicalId":36160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","volume":"5 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257818/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locating hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands using <sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT: an inter- and intra-observer variation study.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Wulf Christensen,&nbsp;Lars Thorbjørn Jensen,&nbsp;Susanne Bonnichsen Søndergaard,&nbsp;Rikke Broholm,&nbsp;Christian Haarmark,&nbsp;Martin Krakauer,&nbsp;Finn Noe Bennedbæk,&nbsp;Bo Zerahn,&nbsp;Waldemar Trolle,&nbsp;Christoffer Holst Hahn,&nbsp;Bent Kristensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41824-021-00108-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of <sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT is gaining ground in detecting hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the robustness of <sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT by assessing intra- and inter-observer agreement to determine whether the method was reader sensitive and therefore should only be performed at highly specialised sites with a high number of cases. PET/CT images of 40 patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism were anonymised and evaluated three times by three readers: an expert reader and two non-experts (non-experts were experienced in PET/CT imaging, but not in <sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT in the setting of primary hyperparathyroidism). Number of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands, location relative to the thyroid gland and confidence of each assessment (low, moderate or high) were noted, and intra- and inter-observer agreement calculated using Fleiss' kappa method. Sensitivities and specificities of the non-experts were calculated using the expert reader as gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-observer agreement was 'good' to 'near perfect' for all readers. Inter-observer agreement was good between non-experts and the expert, with kappa values ≥ 0.74. Sensitivities between non-experts and the expert were high, > 81%, when assessing which side and 75% when assessing thyroid quadrant. All specificities were > 94%. Reader certainties were 'high' in > 80% of cases for the expert and > 70% and > 65%, respectively for the two non-experts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>11</sup>C-Choline PET/CT is not reader sensitive for the localisation of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands and may therefore be safely implemented at sites that have a moderate number of cases. Access to a cyclotron laboratory is, however, a necessity for the production of <sup>11</sup>C-Choline. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki 2 declaration and The International Council for Harmonisation Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH_GCP) clinical trial, approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (Journal-nr.:H-18012490, date of approval: 18 June 2018) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT no. 2018-000726-63, date of approval: 6 June 2018). The GCP unit in Eastern Denmark has carried out regular monitoring of the trial according to GCP (ID: 2018-1050).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8257818/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00108-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00108-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:11c -胆碱PET/CT在原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者中检测甲状旁腺功能亢进的应用越来越广泛。本研究的目的是通过评估观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性来评估11c -胆碱PET/CT的鲁棒性,以确定该方法是否对读取器敏感,因此应该只在高度专业化的高病例位点进行。40例诊断为原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的患者的PET/CT图像被匿名化,并由3名阅读者进行3次评估:1名专家阅读者和2名非专家阅读者(非专家在原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的PET/CT成像方面有经验,但在11c -胆碱PET/CT方面没有经验)。记录功能亢进的甲状旁腺的数量、相对于甲状腺的位置和每个评估的置信度(低、中、高),并使用Fleiss’kappa方法计算观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性。以专家读卡器为金标准计算非专家的灵敏度和特异性。结果:对所有读者来说,观察者内部的一致性都是“好”到“接近完美”。非专家与专家之间的观察者间一致性较好,kappa值≥0.74。非专家和专家之间的敏感性很高,在评估哪一侧时> 81%,在评估甲状腺象限时> 75%。所有特异性均> 94%。在> 80%的专家案例中,读者的确定性是“高”的,而在两个非专家案例中,读者的确定性分别是> 70%和> 65%。结论:11c -胆碱PET/CT对甲状旁腺功能亢进的定位不敏感,因此可以安全地应用于有中等数量病例的部位。然而,使用回旋加速器实验室是生产11c -胆碱的必要条件。该研究是按照赫尔辛基2号宣言和国际协调理事会良好临床实践指南(ICH_GCP)临床试验进行的,由丹麦首都地区研究伦理委员会批准(Journal-nr)。:H-18012490,批准日期:2018年6月18日)和丹麦药品管理局(EudraCT号:2018-000726-63,批准日期:2018年6月6日)。丹麦东部的GCP单位根据GCP (ID: 2018-1050)对试验进行了定期监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Locating hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands using 11C-Choline PET/CT: an inter- and intra-observer variation study.

Background: Use of 11C-Choline PET/CT is gaining ground in detecting hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands in primary hyperparathyroidism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the robustness of 11C-Choline PET/CT by assessing intra- and inter-observer agreement to determine whether the method was reader sensitive and therefore should only be performed at highly specialised sites with a high number of cases. PET/CT images of 40 patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism were anonymised and evaluated three times by three readers: an expert reader and two non-experts (non-experts were experienced in PET/CT imaging, but not in 11C-Choline PET/CT in the setting of primary hyperparathyroidism). Number of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands, location relative to the thyroid gland and confidence of each assessment (low, moderate or high) were noted, and intra- and inter-observer agreement calculated using Fleiss' kappa method. Sensitivities and specificities of the non-experts were calculated using the expert reader as gold standard.

Results: Intra-observer agreement was 'good' to 'near perfect' for all readers. Inter-observer agreement was good between non-experts and the expert, with kappa values ≥ 0.74. Sensitivities between non-experts and the expert were high, > 81%, when assessing which side and 75% when assessing thyroid quadrant. All specificities were > 94%. Reader certainties were 'high' in > 80% of cases for the expert and > 70% and > 65%, respectively for the two non-experts.

Conclusion: 11C-Choline PET/CT is not reader sensitive for the localisation of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands and may therefore be safely implemented at sites that have a moderate number of cases. Access to a cyclotron laboratory is, however, a necessity for the production of 11C-Choline. The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki 2 declaration and The International Council for Harmonisation Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH_GCP) clinical trial, approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (Journal-nr.:H-18012490, date of approval: 18 June 2018) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT no. 2018-000726-63, date of approval: 6 June 2018). The GCP unit in Eastern Denmark has carried out regular monitoring of the trial according to GCP (ID: 2018-1050).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor demonstrated by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in a patient: a case report Carcinoid crisis in Lutetium-177-Dotatate therapy of neuroendocrine tumors: an overview of pathophysiology, risk factors, recognition, and treatment Four-dimensional computed tomography as first-line imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism, a retrospective comparison to conventional imaging in a predominantly single adenoma population Clinical value of semi-quantitative parameters in 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in treatment and diagnostics of cranial meningioma in a single-center retrospective analysis Cardiac transplant rejection assessment with 18F-FDG PET-CT: initial single-centre experience for diagnosis and management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1