骨传导振动是人工耳蜗耳石检测的有效刺激。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/VES-210028
L Fröhlich, M Wilke, S K Plontke, T Rahne
{"title":"骨传导振动是人工耳蜗耳石检测的有效刺激。","authors":"L Fröhlich,&nbsp;M Wilke,&nbsp;S K Plontke,&nbsp;T Rahne","doi":"10.3233/VES-210028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) poses the risk of inducing a behaviorally unmeasurable air-bone gap leading to false negative absence of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) to air conducted sound (ACS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate VEMP response rates to ACS and bone conducted vibration (BCV) in CI patients and the applicability of the B81 transducer for BCV stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective experimental study including unilateral CI patients, measuring cVEMPs and oVEMPs to ACS and to BCV, comparing response rates, signed asymmetry ratios, latencies, and amplitudes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 13 CI patients (mean age 44±12 years) were analyzed. For the CI side, oVEMP and cVEMP response rates were significantly higher for BCV (77%cVEMP, 62%oVEMP) compared to ACS (23%cVEMP, 8%oVEMP). For the contralateral side, no difference between response rates to ACS (85%cVEMP, 69%oVEMP) and BCV (85%cVEMP, 77%oVEMP) was observed. Substantially higher asymmetries were observed for ACS (-88±23%for cVEMPs, -96±11%for oVEMPs) compared to BCV (-12±45%for cVEMPs, 4±74%for oVEMPs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCV is an effective stimulus for VEMP testing in CI patients. The B81 is a feasible stimulator.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/VES-210028","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients.\",\"authors\":\"L Fröhlich,&nbsp;M Wilke,&nbsp;S K Plontke,&nbsp;T Rahne\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/VES-210028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) poses the risk of inducing a behaviorally unmeasurable air-bone gap leading to false negative absence of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) to air conducted sound (ACS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate VEMP response rates to ACS and bone conducted vibration (BCV) in CI patients and the applicability of the B81 transducer for BCV stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective experimental study including unilateral CI patients, measuring cVEMPs and oVEMPs to ACS and to BCV, comparing response rates, signed asymmetry ratios, latencies, and amplitudes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 13 CI patients (mean age 44±12 years) were analyzed. For the CI side, oVEMP and cVEMP response rates were significantly higher for BCV (77%cVEMP, 62%oVEMP) compared to ACS (23%cVEMP, 8%oVEMP). For the contralateral side, no difference between response rates to ACS (85%cVEMP, 69%oVEMP) and BCV (85%cVEMP, 77%oVEMP) was observed. Substantially higher asymmetries were observed for ACS (-88±23%for cVEMPs, -96±11%for oVEMPs) compared to BCV (-12±45%for cVEMPs, 4±74%for oVEMPs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCV is an effective stimulus for VEMP testing in CI patients. The B81 is a feasible stimulator.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/VES-210028\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-210028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-210028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:人工耳蜗(CI)治疗存在诱导行为上不可测量的气骨间隙的风险,导致颈和眼前庭诱发肌源性电位(cemps, oVEMPs)对空气传导声(ACS)的假阴性缺失。目的:探讨CI患者VEMP对ACS和骨传导振动(BCV)的反应率及B81换能器对BCV刺激的适用性。方法:前瞻性实验研究,包括单侧CI患者,测量cveemps和oVEMPs到ACS和BCV,比较反应率、签名不对称比、潜伏期和振幅。结果:分析了13例CI患者的资料,平均年龄44±12岁。在CI方面,BCV的oVEMP和cVEMP缓解率(77%cVEMP, 62%oVEMP)明显高于ACS (23%cVEMP, 8%oVEMP)。对于对侧,ACS (85%cVEMP, 69%oVEMP)和BCV (85%cVEMP, 77%oVEMP)的有效率无差异。与BCV (cVEMPs为-12±45%,oVEMPs为4±74%)相比,ACS (cVEMPs为-88±23%,oVEMPs为-96±11%)的不对称性明显更高。结论:BCV是CI患者VEMP检测的有效刺激物。B81是一种可行的刺激器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients.

Background: Treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) poses the risk of inducing a behaviorally unmeasurable air-bone gap leading to false negative absence of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) to air conducted sound (ACS).

Objective: To investigate VEMP response rates to ACS and bone conducted vibration (BCV) in CI patients and the applicability of the B81 transducer for BCV stimulation.

Methods: Prospective experimental study including unilateral CI patients, measuring cVEMPs and oVEMPs to ACS and to BCV, comparing response rates, signed asymmetry ratios, latencies, and amplitudes.

Results: Data of 13 CI patients (mean age 44±12 years) were analyzed. For the CI side, oVEMP and cVEMP response rates were significantly higher for BCV (77%cVEMP, 62%oVEMP) compared to ACS (23%cVEMP, 8%oVEMP). For the contralateral side, no difference between response rates to ACS (85%cVEMP, 69%oVEMP) and BCV (85%cVEMP, 77%oVEMP) was observed. Substantially higher asymmetries were observed for ACS (-88±23%for cVEMPs, -96±11%for oVEMPs) compared to BCV (-12±45%for cVEMPs, 4±74%for oVEMPs).

Conclusions: BCV is an effective stimulus for VEMP testing in CI patients. The B81 is a feasible stimulator.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
期刊最新文献
Vestibular migraine as a mimic of benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo and Meniere's disease. Effects of monaural sound stimulation on subjective visual vertical. Simulator sickness among helicopter pilots: Incidence, threshold and severity using the SSQ. The vestibular symptomatology of Machado-Joseph Disease. Is vestibular function related to human hippocampal volume?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1