抑郁症长期心理治疗的洞察与结果。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-26 DOI:10.13109/zptm.2021.67.oa10
Guenther Klug, Carolina Seybert, Melanie Ratzek, Imke Grimm, Johannes Zimmermann, Dorothea Huber
{"title":"抑郁症长期心理治疗的洞察与结果。","authors":"Guenther Klug,&nbsp;Carolina Seybert,&nbsp;Melanie Ratzek,&nbsp;Imke Grimm,&nbsp;Johannes Zimmermann,&nbsp;Dorothea Huber","doi":"10.13109/zptm.2021.67.oa10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> In different therapeutic approaches, insight is acknowledged as an important part of patient's therapeutic change process. We examined whether the level of insight (1) differs between psychoanalytic (PA), psychodynamic (PD) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and (2) predicts long-term symptomatic outcome. <b>Methods:</b> A completer sample of 67 depressed patients from the Munich Psychotherapy Study was analyzed. Symptoms were assessed with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Symptom Checklist-Revised (SCL-90-R) at pre-treatment and three-year follow-up. Insight was assessed from 242 sessions of mid-therapy phase with the Experiencing Scale. <b>Results:</b> The general level of insight was higher in PA as compared to CBT, and associated with lower depressive symptoms (BDI) across all three therapeutic modalities at three-year follow-up. Insight was unrelated to general distress (SCL-90-R). Exploratory analyses suggested that patients treated with PA showed higher levels of insight especially in high quality sessions (assessed by therapist). Patients for whom the extent of insight was positively linked to session quality, suffered from more depressive symptoms at three-year follow-up than patients gaining insight when session quality was low. <b>Conclusion:</b> Insight differs between PA and CBT and may be a common change mechanism in long-term psychotherapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51217,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","volume":"68 1","pages":"54-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insight and Outcome in Long-Term Psychotherapies of Depression.\",\"authors\":\"Guenther Klug,&nbsp;Carolina Seybert,&nbsp;Melanie Ratzek,&nbsp;Imke Grimm,&nbsp;Johannes Zimmermann,&nbsp;Dorothea Huber\",\"doi\":\"10.13109/zptm.2021.67.oa10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> In different therapeutic approaches, insight is acknowledged as an important part of patient's therapeutic change process. We examined whether the level of insight (1) differs between psychoanalytic (PA), psychodynamic (PD) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and (2) predicts long-term symptomatic outcome. <b>Methods:</b> A completer sample of 67 depressed patients from the Munich Psychotherapy Study was analyzed. Symptoms were assessed with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Symptom Checklist-Revised (SCL-90-R) at pre-treatment and three-year follow-up. Insight was assessed from 242 sessions of mid-therapy phase with the Experiencing Scale. <b>Results:</b> The general level of insight was higher in PA as compared to CBT, and associated with lower depressive symptoms (BDI) across all three therapeutic modalities at three-year follow-up. Insight was unrelated to general distress (SCL-90-R). Exploratory analyses suggested that patients treated with PA showed higher levels of insight especially in high quality sessions (assessed by therapist). Patients for whom the extent of insight was positively linked to session quality, suffered from more depressive symptoms at three-year follow-up than patients gaining insight when session quality was low. <b>Conclusion:</b> Insight differs between PA and CBT and may be a common change mechanism in long-term psychotherapies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"54-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2021.67.oa10\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychosomatische Medizin Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13109/zptm.2021.67.oa10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在不同的治疗方法中,顿悟被认为是患者治疗改变过程的重要组成部分。我们研究了(1)精神分析(PA)、心理动力学(PD)和认知行为治疗(CBT)之间的洞察力水平是否不同,(2)预测长期症状结果。方法:对来自慕尼黑心理治疗研究的67例抑郁症患者的完整样本进行分析。采用贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和症状量表(SCL-90-R)对治疗前和3年随访时的症状进行评估。洞察力是用体验量表从治疗中期的242个疗程中评估出来的。结果:在三年的随访中,与CBT相比,PA的总体洞察力水平更高,并且在所有三种治疗方式中与较低的抑郁症状(BDI)相关。Insight与一般窘迫无关(SCL-90-R)。探索性分析表明,接受PA治疗的患者表现出更高水平的洞察力,特别是在高质量的会议中(由治疗师评估)。在三年的随访中,洞察程度与会话质量正相关的患者比会话质量较低时获得洞察的患者遭受更多的抑郁症状。结论:PA与CBT的Insight不同,可能是长期心理治疗中常见的改变机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insight and Outcome in Long-Term Psychotherapies of Depression.

Objectives: In different therapeutic approaches, insight is acknowledged as an important part of patient's therapeutic change process. We examined whether the level of insight (1) differs between psychoanalytic (PA), psychodynamic (PD) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and (2) predicts long-term symptomatic outcome. Methods: A completer sample of 67 depressed patients from the Munich Psychotherapy Study was analyzed. Symptoms were assessed with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Symptom Checklist-Revised (SCL-90-R) at pre-treatment and three-year follow-up. Insight was assessed from 242 sessions of mid-therapy phase with the Experiencing Scale. Results: The general level of insight was higher in PA as compared to CBT, and associated with lower depressive symptoms (BDI) across all three therapeutic modalities at three-year follow-up. Insight was unrelated to general distress (SCL-90-R). Exploratory analyses suggested that patients treated with PA showed higher levels of insight especially in high quality sessions (assessed by therapist). Patients for whom the extent of insight was positively linked to session quality, suffered from more depressive symptoms at three-year follow-up than patients gaining insight when session quality was low. Conclusion: Insight differs between PA and CBT and may be a common change mechanism in long-term psychotherapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal provides a systematic overview of the entire field of psychosomatic medicine. It is also the official organ of the German Society for Psychosomatic Medicine and Medical Psychotherapy (DGPM). It serves as a forum for discussions of the interdisciplinary experiences in the field of psychosomatics, the goal being the furtherance of scientific insights into the interactions between mental and physical factors in the development of disease. It also provides a way to deepen one´s knowledge of psychoanalysis and to explore new therapeutic directions.
期刊最新文献
Fragebogen zur Empirischen Untersuchung von Abwehrmechanismen (FEUA). Schweigen in der videobasierten Psychotherapie Eine Pilotstudie. Die Autorinnen und Autoren dieses Heftes. Editorial. Viele Wege führen zum Ziel – Therapieerfolg im Spiegel individueller Strukturen und systemischer Herausforderungen. Inhalt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1