舒比利/缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者体重指数与临床结局的关系

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-17 DOI:10.1177/10742484211024441
Kazuhiko Kido, Christopher Bianco, Marco Caccamo, Wei Fang, George Sokos
{"title":"舒比利/缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者体重指数与临床结局的关系","authors":"Kazuhiko Kido,&nbsp;Christopher Bianco,&nbsp;Marco Caccamo,&nbsp;Wei Fang,&nbsp;George Sokos","doi":"10.1177/10742484211024441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Only limited data are available that address the association between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who are receiving sacubitril/valsartan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective multi-center cohort study in which we compared 3 body mass index groups (normal, overweight and obese groups) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receiving sacubitril/valsartan. The follow-up period was at least 1 year. Propensity score weighting was performed. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 721 patients in the original cohort, propensity score weighting generated a cohort of 540 patients in 3 groups: normal weight (n = 78), overweight (n = 181), and obese (n = 281). All baseline characteristics were well-balanced between 3 groups after propensity score weighting. Among our results, we found no significant differences in hospitalization for heart failure (normal weight versus overweight: average hazard ratio [AHR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76-2.20, <i>P</i> = 0.35; normal weight versus obese: AHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.63-1.70, <i>P</i> = 0.88; overweight versus obese groups: AHR 0.81, 95% CI = 0.54-1.20, <i>P</i> = 0.29) or all-cause mortality (normal weight versus overweight: AHR 0.99, 95% CI = 0.59-1.67, <i>P</i> = 0.97; normal weight versus obese: AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.53-1.42, <i>P</i> = 0.57; overweight versus obese: AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.58-1.32, <i>P</i> = 0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified no significant associations between BMI and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction who were treated with sacubitril/valsartan. A large-scale study should be performed to verify these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"26 6","pages":"619-624"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10742484211024441","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Body Mass Index With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan.\",\"authors\":\"Kazuhiko Kido,&nbsp;Christopher Bianco,&nbsp;Marco Caccamo,&nbsp;Wei Fang,&nbsp;George Sokos\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10742484211024441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Only limited data are available that address the association between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who are receiving sacubitril/valsartan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective multi-center cohort study in which we compared 3 body mass index groups (normal, overweight and obese groups) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receiving sacubitril/valsartan. The follow-up period was at least 1 year. Propensity score weighting was performed. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 721 patients in the original cohort, propensity score weighting generated a cohort of 540 patients in 3 groups: normal weight (n = 78), overweight (n = 181), and obese (n = 281). All baseline characteristics were well-balanced between 3 groups after propensity score weighting. Among our results, we found no significant differences in hospitalization for heart failure (normal weight versus overweight: average hazard ratio [AHR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76-2.20, <i>P</i> = 0.35; normal weight versus obese: AHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.63-1.70, <i>P</i> = 0.88; overweight versus obese groups: AHR 0.81, 95% CI = 0.54-1.20, <i>P</i> = 0.29) or all-cause mortality (normal weight versus overweight: AHR 0.99, 95% CI = 0.59-1.67, <i>P</i> = 0.97; normal weight versus obese: AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.53-1.42, <i>P</i> = 0.57; overweight versus obese: AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.58-1.32, <i>P</i> = 0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified no significant associations between BMI and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction who were treated with sacubitril/valsartan. A large-scale study should be performed to verify these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"619-624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10742484211024441\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211024441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211024441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:只有有限的数据可用于解决接受苏比里尔/缬沙坦治疗的心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者的身体质量指数(BMI)与临床结果之间的关系。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性多中心队列研究,比较了3个身体质量指数组(正常组、超重组和肥胖组)接受苏比利/缬沙坦治疗的心力衰竭患者的射血分数降低。随访期至少1年。进行倾向得分加权。主要结局是因心力衰竭住院和全因死亡率。结果:在原始队列的721例患者中,倾向评分加权产生了3组540例患者:正常体重组(n = 78)、超重组(n = 181)和肥胖组(n = 281)。倾向评分加权后,3组间所有基线特征均平衡良好。在我们的研究结果中,我们发现因心力衰竭住院治疗没有显著差异(正常体重与超重:平均风险比[AHR] 1.29, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.76-2.20, P = 0.35;正常体重与肥胖:AHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.63-1.70, P = 0.88;超重组与肥胖组:AHR 0.81, 95% CI = 0.54-1.20, P = 0.29)或全因死亡率(正常体重组与超重组:AHR 0.99, 95% CI = 0.59-1.67, P = 0.97;正常体重与肥胖:AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.53-1.42, P = 0.57;超重与肥胖:AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.58-1.32, P = 0.52)。结论:我们发现,在被诊断为心力衰竭并射血分数降低的患者中,接受苏比里尔/缬沙坦治疗的BMI与临床结果之间没有显著关联。应该进行大规模的研究来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Body Mass Index With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan.

Background: Only limited data are available that address the association between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who are receiving sacubitril/valsartan.

Methods: We performed a retrospective multi-center cohort study in which we compared 3 body mass index groups (normal, overweight and obese groups) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction receiving sacubitril/valsartan. The follow-up period was at least 1 year. Propensity score weighting was performed. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality.

Results: Of the 721 patients in the original cohort, propensity score weighting generated a cohort of 540 patients in 3 groups: normal weight (n = 78), overweight (n = 181), and obese (n = 281). All baseline characteristics were well-balanced between 3 groups after propensity score weighting. Among our results, we found no significant differences in hospitalization for heart failure (normal weight versus overweight: average hazard ratio [AHR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.76-2.20, P = 0.35; normal weight versus obese: AHR 1.04, 95% CI = 0.63-1.70, P = 0.88; overweight versus obese groups: AHR 0.81, 95% CI = 0.54-1.20, P = 0.29) or all-cause mortality (normal weight versus overweight: AHR 0.99, 95% CI = 0.59-1.67, P = 0.97; normal weight versus obese: AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.53-1.42, P = 0.57; overweight versus obese: AHR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.58-1.32, P = 0.52).

Conclusion: We identified no significant associations between BMI and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction who were treated with sacubitril/valsartan. A large-scale study should be performed to verify these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1