COVID - 19大流行对院内创伤护理工作流程的影响和修改:为未来吸取的经验教训。

Gaurav Kaushik, Ankita Sharma, Dinesh Bagaria, Subodh Kumar, Sushma Sagar, Amit Gupta
{"title":"COVID - 19大流行对院内创伤护理工作流程的影响和修改:为未来吸取的经验教训。","authors":"Gaurav Kaushik,&nbsp;Ankita Sharma,&nbsp;Dinesh Bagaria,&nbsp;Subodh Kumar,&nbsp;Sushma Sagar,&nbsp;Amit Gupta","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2021.88507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the restructuring in-hospital systems of care at a Level -1 trauma center in India and to analyze an injury volume and patterns for future preparedness as well as to establish a specific injuries preventive measures during health emergencies like COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was extracted from a prospectively managed trauma registry at level-1 trauma center in India. We have compared the data in lockdown period with the same day's number from the pre-lockdown period. Patients were categorized according to age, gender, injury cause, injury place, injury severity, and injury outcome to compare the statistical analysis between two periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total emergency department (ED) trauma footfall decreased significantly by 73% during lockdown period. The injuries result increased significantly due to blunt forces. There was a significant decrease in the major injury of the patient's percentage. The road traffic injuries (RTIs) in individuals were less than the reported falls number, which increased significantly during lockdown. The less number of patients significantly presented without receiving primary care. Majority of the patients had been transferred by using private cars, police vehicle, and two wheelers during lockdown; however, patients' less number were transferred significantly by three wheelers as expected. The comparative analysis between quantitative data points shows significant differences in median Injury Severity Score (ISS) and length of stay during lockdown.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted that the preparedness should not focus solely on the response to treat infectious disease during health emergencies but also on ensuring access and provision of reasonable quality of care for non-infectious illnesses especially acute conditions like trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195829/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact and Modifications of In-Hospital Trauma Care Workflow Due to COVID 19 Pandemic: Lessons Learnt for the Future.\",\"authors\":\"Gaurav Kaushik,&nbsp;Ankita Sharma,&nbsp;Dinesh Bagaria,&nbsp;Subodh Kumar,&nbsp;Sushma Sagar,&nbsp;Amit Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/BEAT.2021.88507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the restructuring in-hospital systems of care at a Level -1 trauma center in India and to analyze an injury volume and patterns for future preparedness as well as to establish a specific injuries preventive measures during health emergencies like COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was extracted from a prospectively managed trauma registry at level-1 trauma center in India. We have compared the data in lockdown period with the same day's number from the pre-lockdown period. Patients were categorized according to age, gender, injury cause, injury place, injury severity, and injury outcome to compare the statistical analysis between two periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total emergency department (ED) trauma footfall decreased significantly by 73% during lockdown period. The injuries result increased significantly due to blunt forces. There was a significant decrease in the major injury of the patient's percentage. The road traffic injuries (RTIs) in individuals were less than the reported falls number, which increased significantly during lockdown. The less number of patients significantly presented without receiving primary care. Majority of the patients had been transferred by using private cars, police vehicle, and two wheelers during lockdown; however, patients' less number were transferred significantly by three wheelers as expected. The comparative analysis between quantitative data points shows significant differences in median Injury Severity Score (ISS) and length of stay during lockdown.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted that the preparedness should not focus solely on the response to treat infectious disease during health emergencies but also on ensuring access and provision of reasonable quality of care for non-infectious illnesses especially acute conditions like trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8195829/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2021.88507\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2021.88507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:描述印度一级创伤中心医院内护理系统的重组,分析未来准备的伤害数量和模式,并在COVID-19等卫生紧急情况下建立具体的伤害预防措施。方法:数据从印度一级创伤中心前瞻性管理的创伤登记处提取。我们将封锁期间的数据与封锁前同一天的数据进行了比较。患者按年龄、性别、损伤原因、损伤部位、损伤严重程度、损伤结局进行分类,比较两期间的统计分析。结果:在封锁期间,急诊科(ED)创伤总客流量显著下降了73%。由于钝器的作用,损伤结果显著增加。严重损伤患者的比例有明显下降。个人道路交通伤害(rti)低于报告的跌倒人数,而在封锁期间,跌倒人数显著增加。较少的患者明显没有接受初级保健。大部分患者在封锁期间使用私家车、警车和两轮车转移;然而,正如预期的那样,三轮车转移的患者人数较少。定量数据点之间的比较分析显示,受伤严重程度评分(ISS)中位数和封锁期间的住院时间存在显著差异。结论:本研究强调,防范工作不应仅仅侧重于在突发卫生事件期间治疗传染病的反应,还应侧重于确保获得和提供合理质量的非传染性疾病护理,特别是创伤等急性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact and Modifications of In-Hospital Trauma Care Workflow Due to COVID 19 Pandemic: Lessons Learnt for the Future.

Objective: To describe the restructuring in-hospital systems of care at a Level -1 trauma center in India and to analyze an injury volume and patterns for future preparedness as well as to establish a specific injuries preventive measures during health emergencies like COVID-19.

Methods: Data was extracted from a prospectively managed trauma registry at level-1 trauma center in India. We have compared the data in lockdown period with the same day's number from the pre-lockdown period. Patients were categorized according to age, gender, injury cause, injury place, injury severity, and injury outcome to compare the statistical analysis between two periods.

Results: Total emergency department (ED) trauma footfall decreased significantly by 73% during lockdown period. The injuries result increased significantly due to blunt forces. There was a significant decrease in the major injury of the patient's percentage. The road traffic injuries (RTIs) in individuals were less than the reported falls number, which increased significantly during lockdown. The less number of patients significantly presented without receiving primary care. Majority of the patients had been transferred by using private cars, police vehicle, and two wheelers during lockdown; however, patients' less number were transferred significantly by three wheelers as expected. The comparative analysis between quantitative data points shows significant differences in median Injury Severity Score (ISS) and length of stay during lockdown.

Conclusion: This study highlighted that the preparedness should not focus solely on the response to treat infectious disease during health emergencies but also on ensuring access and provision of reasonable quality of care for non-infectious illnesses especially acute conditions like trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
期刊最新文献
An Epidemiological Investigation on Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from 2010 to 2020. A Novel Skin Incision for Posterior Fossa Midline and Paramedian Lesions: A Technical Note and Case Series. Surgical Treatment versus Conservative Management of Splenic Rupture: Outcomes and Risk Factors. Effect of Intranasal Remifentanil versus Lidocaine on Facilitation of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Cardiovascular Response: A Double-blind Clinical Trial Study. Ten-year Causes of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Patients Referred to Ghaem Hospital from 2009 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1