Timothy G White, Gabriela Martinez, Jason Wang, Michele Gribko, Artem Boltyenkov, Rohan Arora, Jeffrey M Katz, Henry H Woo, Pina C Sanelli
{"title":"COVID-19大流行对急性缺血性卒中的表现、治疗和结局的影响","authors":"Timothy G White, Gabriela Martinez, Jason Wang, Michele Gribko, Artem Boltyenkov, Rohan Arora, Jeffrey M Katz, Henry H Woo, Pina C Sanelli","doi":"10.1155/2021/8653396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic last year. While a clear impact of COVID-19 on the declining stroke volume has been reported, its overall impact on stroke presentation and clinical outcomes has not been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on acute ischemic stroke volume, presentation, treatment, and outcomes at comprehensive stroke centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke from the Get With The Guidelines database was performed from January 1, 2019, to July 1, 2020. The following time periods were defined: Pre-COVID (January/February), Peak-COVID (March/April), and Post-COVID (May/June). Bivariate analyses were performed comparing the 2020 and 2019 time periods to determine differences in stroke volume, presentation, treatment, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stroke volumes were significantly lower during the Peak-COVID period in 2020 compared to that in 2019, with an absolute decline of 49.5% (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients were more likely to present after 24 hours from last known well during the 2020 Peak-COVID period (<i>P</i> = 0.03). However, there was not a significant difference in the rate of treatment with either the tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or mechanical thrombectomy during the Peak-COVID period. Interestingly, relative treatment rates increased during the 2020 Post-COVID period to 11.4% (<i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall ischemic stroke volume decreased during the pandemic, and patients had a tendency to present later, beyond eligible treatment windows. However, rates of treatment, patient demographics, and stroke outcomes did not significantly change when compared to the prior year.</p>","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324380/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Acute Ischemic Stroke Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy G White, Gabriela Martinez, Jason Wang, Michele Gribko, Artem Boltyenkov, Rohan Arora, Jeffrey M Katz, Henry H Woo, Pina C Sanelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/8653396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic last year. While a clear impact of COVID-19 on the declining stroke volume has been reported, its overall impact on stroke presentation and clinical outcomes has not been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on acute ischemic stroke volume, presentation, treatment, and outcomes at comprehensive stroke centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke from the Get With The Guidelines database was performed from January 1, 2019, to July 1, 2020. The following time periods were defined: Pre-COVID (January/February), Peak-COVID (March/April), and Post-COVID (May/June). Bivariate analyses were performed comparing the 2020 and 2019 time periods to determine differences in stroke volume, presentation, treatment, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stroke volumes were significantly lower during the Peak-COVID period in 2020 compared to that in 2019, with an absolute decline of 49.5% (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients were more likely to present after 24 hours from last known well during the 2020 Peak-COVID period (<i>P</i> = 0.03). However, there was not a significant difference in the rate of treatment with either the tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or mechanical thrombectomy during the Peak-COVID period. Interestingly, relative treatment rates increased during the 2020 Post-COVID period to 11.4% (<i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall ischemic stroke volume decreased during the pandemic, and patients had a tendency to present later, beyond eligible treatment windows. However, rates of treatment, patient demographics, and stroke outcomes did not significantly change when compared to the prior year.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8324380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8653396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8653396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
导言:世界卫生组织去年宣布COVID-19为全球大流行。虽然有报道称COVID-19对卒中量下降有明显影响,但尚未确定其对卒中表现和临床结果的总体影响。本研究的目的是评估COVID-19对综合卒中中心急性缺血性卒中的容量、表现、治疗和结局的影响。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月1日至2020年7月1日Get with the Guidelines数据库中出院诊断为急性缺血性脑卒中的患者。定义了以下时间段:covid前(1月/ 2月)、covid高峰(3月/ 4月)和covid后(5月/ 6月)。进行双变量分析,比较2020年和2019年的时间段,以确定卒中量、表现、治疗和结果的差异。结果:与2019年相比,2020年新冠肺炎疫情高峰期卒中量明显下降,绝对降幅为49.5% (P < 0.001)。在2020年新冠肺炎高峰期间,患者更有可能在距离最后已知地点24小时后出现(P = 0.03)。然而,在covid高峰期间,组织纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)或机械取栓的治疗率没有显著差异。有趣的是,在2020年covid后期间,相对治疗率上升至11.4% (P = 0.01)。结论:大流行期间缺血性脑卒中总容量下降,患者倾向于出现较晚,超过符合条件的治疗窗口。然而,与前一年相比,治疗率、患者人口统计数据和中风结果没有显著变化。
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Acute Ischemic Stroke Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes.
Introduction: The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic last year. While a clear impact of COVID-19 on the declining stroke volume has been reported, its overall impact on stroke presentation and clinical outcomes has not been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 on acute ischemic stroke volume, presentation, treatment, and outcomes at comprehensive stroke centers.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke from the Get With The Guidelines database was performed from January 1, 2019, to July 1, 2020. The following time periods were defined: Pre-COVID (January/February), Peak-COVID (March/April), and Post-COVID (May/June). Bivariate analyses were performed comparing the 2020 and 2019 time periods to determine differences in stroke volume, presentation, treatment, and outcomes.
Results: Stroke volumes were significantly lower during the Peak-COVID period in 2020 compared to that in 2019, with an absolute decline of 49.5% (P < 0.001). Patients were more likely to present after 24 hours from last known well during the 2020 Peak-COVID period (P = 0.03). However, there was not a significant difference in the rate of treatment with either the tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or mechanical thrombectomy during the Peak-COVID period. Interestingly, relative treatment rates increased during the 2020 Post-COVID period to 11.4% (P = 0.01).
Conclusions: The overall ischemic stroke volume decreased during the pandemic, and patients had a tendency to present later, beyond eligible treatment windows. However, rates of treatment, patient demographics, and stroke outcomes did not significantly change when compared to the prior year.