通过一名外科医生的经验对未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)进行显微手术切除:为什么我们一定要在我们的卫生领域保留神经外科技术?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-03 DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05366-2
Biagia LA Pira, Veronica Picotti, Marta Zappalà, Vincenza Maiola, Alessandro Pesce, Alessandro Frati, Antonio Santoro, Giancarlo D'Andrea
{"title":"通过一名外科医生的经验对未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)进行显微手术切除:为什么我们一定要在我们的卫生领域保留神经外科技术?","authors":"Biagia LA Pira, Veronica Picotti, Marta Zappalà, Vincenza Maiola, Alessandro Pesce, Alessandro Frati, Antonio Santoro, Giancarlo D'Andrea","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05366-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The long-standing comparison between the endovascular and microsurgical treatment is still ongoing. While not any center avails of a neuroendovascular service, and not every aneurysm is suitable for endovascular treatment, the neurovascular technique is slowly disappearing from our territories, whereas in the current literature, the role of the neurosurgical treatment is being re-appreciated. The aim of this paper was to discuss a single surgeon's clinical and radiological results with the microsurgical management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological records of patients treated for UIA, by a single surgeon, in the period ranging between 2015 and 2019. We recorded all the relevant anatomic features of the aneurysm, saliencies of the surgical treatment, such as the need for temporary clipping, intraoperative rupture, or postoperative complications. The results of the clinical and radiological follow-up examinations were recorded either.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patient undergoing microsurgical clipping were included, harboring a total of 65 UIAs. CTA with 3D reconstructions was sufficient to reach a reliable preoperative planning in 46 patients (76%). A total of 94% of the cases were unchanged or neurologically unremarkable at follow-up. The presence of postoperative complications was associated to the neck size and predictor of a longer hospitalizations, as well as longer hospitalizations are associated to the patients' age, size of the aneurysms and surgical times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our experience, we believe that microsurgical clipping plays a critical role in the management of UIA, also on the ground of the encouraging results of the relevant literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by a single surgeon's experience: why should we preserve the neurosurgical skills in our health areas?\",\"authors\":\"Biagia LA Pira, Veronica Picotti, Marta Zappalà, Vincenza Maiola, Alessandro Pesce, Alessandro Frati, Antonio Santoro, Giancarlo D'Andrea\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05366-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The long-standing comparison between the endovascular and microsurgical treatment is still ongoing. While not any center avails of a neuroendovascular service, and not every aneurysm is suitable for endovascular treatment, the neurovascular technique is slowly disappearing from our territories, whereas in the current literature, the role of the neurosurgical treatment is being re-appreciated. The aim of this paper was to discuss a single surgeon's clinical and radiological results with the microsurgical management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological records of patients treated for UIA, by a single surgeon, in the period ranging between 2015 and 2019. We recorded all the relevant anatomic features of the aneurysm, saliencies of the surgical treatment, such as the need for temporary clipping, intraoperative rupture, or postoperative complications. The results of the clinical and radiological follow-up examinations were recorded either.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patient undergoing microsurgical clipping were included, harboring a total of 65 UIAs. CTA with 3D reconstructions was sufficient to reach a reliable preoperative planning in 46 patients (76%). A total of 94% of the cases were unchanged or neurologically unremarkable at follow-up. The presence of postoperative complications was associated to the neck size and predictor of a longer hospitalizations, as well as longer hospitalizations are associated to the patients' age, size of the aneurysms and surgical times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our experience, we believe that microsurgical clipping plays a critical role in the management of UIA, also on the ground of the encouraging results of the relevant literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05366-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05366-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管内治疗和显微外科治疗之间的比较由来已久,目前仍在进行中。尽管并非任何中心都提供神经血管内治疗服务,也并非每一个动脉瘤都适合血管内治疗,但神经血管技术正逐渐从我们的领土上消失,而在当前的文献中,神经外科治疗的作用正重新得到重视。本文旨在讨论一位外科医生通过显微手术治疗 UIA 的临床和放射学结果:我们回顾性地查看了一位外科医生在 2015 年至 2019 年期间治疗 UIA 患者的临床和放射学记录。我们记录了动脉瘤的所有相关解剖特征、手术治疗的突出问题,如是否需要临时夹闭、术中破裂或术后并发症。此外,还记录了临床和放射学随访检查的结果:结果:58 名患者接受了显微外科剪切术,共切除了 65 个 UIA。46名患者(76%)的CTA三维重建足以达成可靠的术前规划。94%的病例在随访时无变化或神经系统无异常。术后并发症的出现与颈部大小有关,是住院时间延长的预测因素,而住院时间的延长与患者的年龄、动脉瘤大小和手术时间有关:根据我们的经验,我们认为显微外科剪切术在 UIA 的治疗中起着至关重要的作用,相关文献的研究结果也令人鼓舞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by a single surgeon's experience: why should we preserve the neurosurgical skills in our health areas?

Background: The long-standing comparison between the endovascular and microsurgical treatment is still ongoing. While not any center avails of a neuroendovascular service, and not every aneurysm is suitable for endovascular treatment, the neurovascular technique is slowly disappearing from our territories, whereas in the current literature, the role of the neurosurgical treatment is being re-appreciated. The aim of this paper was to discuss a single surgeon's clinical and radiological results with the microsurgical management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological records of patients treated for UIA, by a single surgeon, in the period ranging between 2015 and 2019. We recorded all the relevant anatomic features of the aneurysm, saliencies of the surgical treatment, such as the need for temporary clipping, intraoperative rupture, or postoperative complications. The results of the clinical and radiological follow-up examinations were recorded either.

Results: Fifty-eight patient undergoing microsurgical clipping were included, harboring a total of 65 UIAs. CTA with 3D reconstructions was sufficient to reach a reliable preoperative planning in 46 patients (76%). A total of 94% of the cases were unchanged or neurologically unremarkable at follow-up. The presence of postoperative complications was associated to the neck size and predictor of a longer hospitalizations, as well as longer hospitalizations are associated to the patients' age, size of the aneurysms and surgical times.

Conclusions: According to our experience, we believe that microsurgical clipping plays a critical role in the management of UIA, also on the ground of the encouraging results of the relevant literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Roxadustat protects oxidative stress and tissue injury in the brain induced by ischemic stroke via the HIF-1α/NRF2 axis. Follow-up neuroimaging after non-perimesencephalic, angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: surgical outcomes in 65 patients, review of the literature and proposal for an anatomical and radiological classification. Association of baseline frailty and age with postoperative outcomes in metastatic brain tumor patients. VEGF gene polymorphisms in Iranian patients with intracranial glioblastoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1