新冠肺炎疫情期间创伤后应激障碍患者的远程精神病学研究

Q1 Psychology Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-06 DOI:10.1007/s40501-021-00245-z
Moria Malka, Cornelius Gropp, Sol Jaworowski, Menachem Oberbaum, David E Katz
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情期间创伤后应激障碍患者的远程精神病学研究","authors":"Moria Malka,&nbsp;Cornelius Gropp,&nbsp;Sol Jaworowski,&nbsp;Menachem Oberbaum,&nbsp;David E Katz","doi":"10.1007/s40501-021-00245-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, emerged from Wuhan, China, causing a pandemic. Access to outpatient psychiatric care was limited. We conducted a pilot study of telepsychiatry during a national shutdown. Adult patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) participated via Zoom. Patient preference comparing televisits to face-to-face visits was assessed.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Telemedicine has emerged as new technological tool in the evolution of the patient-physician relationship, changing the way we interact. Physicians and patients now have access to the electronic medical record, remote point-of-care testing, and each other. The present epidemic allows us to test the limits of technology in combating limited access to care for patients with psychiatric illness.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Twenty (90% male) patients with PTSD participated. Most (90 %) were moderately to severely depressed, and 50% used medical cannabis and increased their dosage during the study period. Patients preferred face-to-face meetings for its ease of use (p < .01) and general satisfaction from therapy (p < .01). However, given continued outbreak-limiting access to care, most patients stated they would continue with telepsychiatry. While most patients preferred face-to-face visits, telepsychiatry can be used during times of outbreak-limiting access to care. Future research and development should be directed at improving technological ease of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11088,"journal":{"name":"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40501-021-00245-z","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telepsychiatry for Patients with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder During the COVID-19 Outbreak.\",\"authors\":\"Moria Malka,&nbsp;Cornelius Gropp,&nbsp;Sol Jaworowski,&nbsp;Menachem Oberbaum,&nbsp;David E Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40501-021-00245-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, emerged from Wuhan, China, causing a pandemic. Access to outpatient psychiatric care was limited. We conducted a pilot study of telepsychiatry during a national shutdown. Adult patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) participated via Zoom. Patient preference comparing televisits to face-to-face visits was assessed.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Telemedicine has emerged as new technological tool in the evolution of the patient-physician relationship, changing the way we interact. Physicians and patients now have access to the electronic medical record, remote point-of-care testing, and each other. The present epidemic allows us to test the limits of technology in combating limited access to care for patients with psychiatric illness.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Twenty (90% male) patients with PTSD participated. Most (90 %) were moderately to severely depressed, and 50% used medical cannabis and increased their dosage during the study period. Patients preferred face-to-face meetings for its ease of use (p < .01) and general satisfaction from therapy (p < .01). However, given continued outbreak-limiting access to care, most patients stated they would continue with telepsychiatry. While most patients preferred face-to-face visits, telepsychiatry can be used during times of outbreak-limiting access to care. Future research and development should be directed at improving technological ease of use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40501-021-00245-z\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-021-00245-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-021-00245-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2从中国武汉出现并引起大流行。获得门诊精神病治疗的机会有限。我们在国家停摆期间进行了远程精神病学的试点研究。患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的成年患者通过Zoom参与。评估了患者对电视就诊和面对面就诊的偏好。最近的发现:远程医疗已经成为医患关系发展的新技术工具,改变了我们互动的方式。医生和病人现在可以访问电子医疗记录,远程护理点测试,以及彼此。目前的流行病使我们能够测试技术的极限,以解决精神疾病患者获得护理的机会有限的问题。总结:20例PTSD患者(90%为男性)参与研究。大多数人(90%)患有中度至重度抑郁症,50%的人在研究期间使用医用大麻并增加了剂量。患者更倾向于面对面会议,因为它易于使用(p < 0.01)和总体满意度治疗(p < 0.01)。然而,鉴于疫情持续受限,大多数患者表示他们将继续接受远程精神病学治疗。虽然大多数患者更喜欢面对面就诊,但在疫情限制获得护理的时候,可以使用远程精神病学。今后的研究和发展应着眼于提高技术的易用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telepsychiatry for Patients with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder During the COVID-19 Outbreak.

Purpose: The novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, emerged from Wuhan, China, causing a pandemic. Access to outpatient psychiatric care was limited. We conducted a pilot study of telepsychiatry during a national shutdown. Adult patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) participated via Zoom. Patient preference comparing televisits to face-to-face visits was assessed.

Recent findings: Telemedicine has emerged as new technological tool in the evolution of the patient-physician relationship, changing the way we interact. Physicians and patients now have access to the electronic medical record, remote point-of-care testing, and each other. The present epidemic allows us to test the limits of technology in combating limited access to care for patients with psychiatric illness.

Summary: Twenty (90% male) patients with PTSD participated. Most (90 %) were moderately to severely depressed, and 50% used medical cannabis and increased their dosage during the study period. Patients preferred face-to-face meetings for its ease of use (p < .01) and general satisfaction from therapy (p < .01). However, given continued outbreak-limiting access to care, most patients stated they would continue with telepsychiatry. While most patients preferred face-to-face visits, telepsychiatry can be used during times of outbreak-limiting access to care. Future research and development should be directed at improving technological ease of use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal focuses on the latest advances in the multifaceted treatment of psychiatric disorders. Designed for physicians and other mental health professionals, Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry offers expert reviews on the management of a range of mental health conditions, includingSchizophrenia and other psychotic disordersSubstance use disordersAnxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and related disordersMood disordersEating and other impulse control disordersPersonality disordersArticles cover a range of established and emerging treatment options across the lifespan, and their innovative, hands-on format makes them ideal for informing treatment decisions at the point of care.We accomplish this by appointing leaders in the field to serve as Section Editors in key areas. Section Editors, in turn, select the most pressing topics as well as experts to present the latest research, assess the efficacy of available treatment options, and discuss special considerations.Additionally, an international Editorial Board—representing a range of disciplines within psychiatry and psychology—ensures that the journal content includes current, emerging research and suggests articles of special interest to their country or region.
期刊最新文献
Modulating the Mitochondria for Mood Disorders: Emerging Evidence for Transcranial Photobiomodulation in Major Depressive Disorder Military Moral Injury: Current Controversies and Future Care Correction: Digital Interventions for Relapse Prevention, Illness Self‑Management, and Health Promotion In Schizophrenia: Recent Advances, Continued Challenges, and Future Opportunities Digital Interventions for Adolescents and Young Adults Experiencing Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Leveraging Digital Media to Promote Youth Mental Health: Flipping the Script on Social Media-Related Risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1