跨国倡导反对中国、印度和巴西在全球南方采掘项目的政治。

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Environment & Development Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-15 DOI:10.1177/10704965211019083
Leah Shipton, Peter Dauvergne
{"title":"跨国倡导反对中国、印度和巴西在全球南方采掘项目的政治。","authors":"Leah Shipton,&nbsp;Peter Dauvergne","doi":"10.1177/10704965211019083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Activists in the global South have been navigating two powerful trends since the mid-1990s: intensifying state repression and rising investment in extractive projects from the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). In this context, this article explores the underlying forces determining the formation, endurance, and power of BRICS-South transnational advocacy networks (TANs) opposed to BRICS-based corporate extraction in the global South. By analyzing activism against Chinese, Indian, and Brazilian extractive projects in Ecuador, Ethiopia, and Mozambique, respectively, the research reveals the critical importance of domestic politics and civil society characteristics in both the BRICS and host states for shaping BRICS-South TANs, including which groups assume leadership, the extent of cross-national cooperation, and the role of nonprofits headquartered in the global North. The findings uncover core reasons for the variable resiliency and capacity of BRICS-South TANs, opening up new avenues of research and offering valuable insights for activists and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environment & Development","volume":"30 3","pages":"240-264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10704965211019083","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Politics of Transnational Advocacy Against Chinese, Indian, and Brazilian Extractive Projects in the Global South.\",\"authors\":\"Leah Shipton,&nbsp;Peter Dauvergne\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10704965211019083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Activists in the global South have been navigating two powerful trends since the mid-1990s: intensifying state repression and rising investment in extractive projects from the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). In this context, this article explores the underlying forces determining the formation, endurance, and power of BRICS-South transnational advocacy networks (TANs) opposed to BRICS-based corporate extraction in the global South. By analyzing activism against Chinese, Indian, and Brazilian extractive projects in Ecuador, Ethiopia, and Mozambique, respectively, the research reveals the critical importance of domestic politics and civil society characteristics in both the BRICS and host states for shaping BRICS-South TANs, including which groups assume leadership, the extent of cross-national cooperation, and the role of nonprofits headquartered in the global North. The findings uncover core reasons for the variable resiliency and capacity of BRICS-South TANs, opening up new avenues of research and offering valuable insights for activists and policymakers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environment & Development\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"240-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/10704965211019083\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environment & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965211019083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environment & Development","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965211019083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自20世纪90年代中期以来,全球南方的活动人士一直在引导两种强大的趋势:加强国家镇压,以及巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非(金砖国家)等新兴经济体对采掘项目的投资不断增加。在此背景下,本文探讨了决定金砖国家-南方跨国倡导网络(TANs)形成、持续和力量的潜在力量,这些倡导网络反对以金砖国家为基础的南方企业榨取。通过分析针对中国、印度和巴西在厄瓜多尔、埃塞俄比亚和莫桑比克的采掘项目的行动主义,该研究揭示了金砖国家和东道国的国内政治和公民社会特征对形成金砖国家-南合作伙伴关系的关键重要性,包括哪些团体担任领导,跨国合作的程度,以及总部设在全球北方的非营利组织的作用。研究结果揭示了金砖国家南部国家弹性和能力变化的核心原因,开辟了新的研究途径,并为活动家和政策制定者提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Politics of Transnational Advocacy Against Chinese, Indian, and Brazilian Extractive Projects in the Global South.

Activists in the global South have been navigating two powerful trends since the mid-1990s: intensifying state repression and rising investment in extractive projects from the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). In this context, this article explores the underlying forces determining the formation, endurance, and power of BRICS-South transnational advocacy networks (TANs) opposed to BRICS-based corporate extraction in the global South. By analyzing activism against Chinese, Indian, and Brazilian extractive projects in Ecuador, Ethiopia, and Mozambique, respectively, the research reveals the critical importance of domestic politics and civil society characteristics in both the BRICS and host states for shaping BRICS-South TANs, including which groups assume leadership, the extent of cross-national cooperation, and the role of nonprofits headquartered in the global North. The findings uncover core reasons for the variable resiliency and capacity of BRICS-South TANs, opening up new avenues of research and offering valuable insights for activists and policymakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environment & Development seeks to further research and debate on the nexus of environment and development issues at the local, national, regional, and international levels. The journal provides a forum that bridges the parallel debates among policy makers, attorneys, academics, business people, and NGO activists from all regions of the world. The journal invites submissions in such topics areas as the interaction between trade and environment; the role of local, national, regional, and international institutions in environmental governance; analysis of international environmental agreements; the impact of environmental regulation on investment policy; legal and scientific issues related to sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
Stakeholder Participation and Solid Waste Management in Lira City East Division Environmental and Health Impacts of Crude Oil Exploration in the Niger Delta Comparative Study of Air Quality Assessment in Bonny, Bille And Degema Communities in The Niger Delta Region, Nigeria Assessment of the Potentials of Theobroma Cacao Pod-Feldspar Composite Adsorbent for Heavy Metal Removal in Waste Water Systematic Review of GIS and Remote Sensing Applications for Assessing the Socioeconomic Impacts of Mining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1