联合氨基酸PET-MRI鉴别治疗后胶质瘤复发:我们一起成长。

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Pub Date : 2021-08-18 DOI:10.1186/s41824-021-00109-y
Shumyla Jabeen, Arpana Arbind, Dinesh Kumar, Pardeep Kumar Singh, Jitender Saini, Nishanth Sadashiva, Uday Krishna, Arivazhagan Arimappamagan, Vani Santosh, Chandana Nagaraj
{"title":"联合氨基酸PET-MRI鉴别治疗后胶质瘤复发:我们一起成长。","authors":"Shumyla Jabeen,&nbsp;Arpana Arbind,&nbsp;Dinesh Kumar,&nbsp;Pardeep Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Jitender Saini,&nbsp;Nishanth Sadashiva,&nbsp;Uday Krishna,&nbsp;Arivazhagan Arimappamagan,&nbsp;Vani Santosh,&nbsp;Chandana Nagaraj","doi":"10.1186/s41824-021-00109-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of amino acid PET, MR perfusion and diffusion as stand-alone modalities and in combination in identifying recurrence in post-treatment gliomas and to qualitatively assess spatial concordance between the three modalities using simultaneous PET-MR acquisition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 48 cases of post-treatment gliomas who underwent simultaneous PET-MRI using C11 methionine as radiotracer was performed. MR perfusion and diffusion sequences were acquired during the PET study. The following parameters were obtained: TBR<sub>max</sub>, TBR<sub>mean</sub>, SUV<sub>max</sub>, and SUV<sub>mean</sub> from the PET images; rCBV from perfusion; and ADC<sub>mean</sub> and ADC<sub>ratio</sub> from the diffusion images. The final diagnosis was based on clinical/imaging follow-up and histopathology when available. ROC curve analysis in combination with logistic regression analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance. Spatial concordance between modalities was graded as 0, 1, and 2 representing discordance, < 50% and > 50% concordance respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 35 cases of recurrence and 13 cases of post-treatment changes without recurrence. The highest area under curve (AUC) was obtained for TBR<sub>max</sub> followed by rCBV and ADC<sub>ratio</sub>. The AUC increased significantly with a combination of rCBV and TBR<sub>max</sub>. Amino acid PET showed the highest diagnostic accuracy and maximum agreement with the final diagnosis. There was discordance between ADC and PET in 22.9%, between rCBV and PET in 16.7% and between PET and contrast enhancement in 14.6% cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amino acid PET had the highest diagnostic accuracy in identifying recurrence in post-treatment gliomas. Combination of PET with MRI further increased the AUC thus improving the diagnostic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","volume":"5 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371055/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined amino acid PET-MRI for identifying recurrence in post-treatment gliomas: together we grow.\",\"authors\":\"Shumyla Jabeen,&nbsp;Arpana Arbind,&nbsp;Dinesh Kumar,&nbsp;Pardeep Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Jitender Saini,&nbsp;Nishanth Sadashiva,&nbsp;Uday Krishna,&nbsp;Arivazhagan Arimappamagan,&nbsp;Vani Santosh,&nbsp;Chandana Nagaraj\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41824-021-00109-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of amino acid PET, MR perfusion and diffusion as stand-alone modalities and in combination in identifying recurrence in post-treatment gliomas and to qualitatively assess spatial concordance between the three modalities using simultaneous PET-MR acquisition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 48 cases of post-treatment gliomas who underwent simultaneous PET-MRI using C11 methionine as radiotracer was performed. MR perfusion and diffusion sequences were acquired during the PET study. The following parameters were obtained: TBR<sub>max</sub>, TBR<sub>mean</sub>, SUV<sub>max</sub>, and SUV<sub>mean</sub> from the PET images; rCBV from perfusion; and ADC<sub>mean</sub> and ADC<sub>ratio</sub> from the diffusion images. The final diagnosis was based on clinical/imaging follow-up and histopathology when available. ROC curve analysis in combination with logistic regression analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance. Spatial concordance between modalities was graded as 0, 1, and 2 representing discordance, < 50% and > 50% concordance respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 35 cases of recurrence and 13 cases of post-treatment changes without recurrence. The highest area under curve (AUC) was obtained for TBR<sub>max</sub> followed by rCBV and ADC<sub>ratio</sub>. The AUC increased significantly with a combination of rCBV and TBR<sub>max</sub>. Amino acid PET showed the highest diagnostic accuracy and maximum agreement with the final diagnosis. There was discordance between ADC and PET in 22.9%, between rCBV and PET in 16.7% and between PET and contrast enhancement in 14.6% cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amino acid PET had the highest diagnostic accuracy in identifying recurrence in post-treatment gliomas. Combination of PET with MRI further increased the AUC thus improving the diagnostic performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8371055/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00109-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hybrid Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00109-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较氨基酸PET、MR灌注和扩散作为单独和联合诊断胶质瘤治疗后复发的准确性,并通过同时获得PET-MR定性评估三种模式之间的空间一致性。方法:回顾性分析48例治疗后胶质瘤同时行PET-MRI,采用C11蛋氨酸作示踪剂。在PET研究中获得MR灌注和扩散序列。得到以下参数:PET图像的TBRmax、TBRmean、SUVmax、SUVmean;rCBV灌注;以及扩散图像的ADCmean和ADCratio。最终诊断基于临床/影像学随访和组织病理学。采用ROC曲线分析结合logistic回归分析比较诊断效果。模式之间的空间一致性分别被分级为0、1和2,分别代表不一致性和50%一致性。结果:35例复发,13例术后改变无复发。曲线下面积(AUC)最高的是TBRmax,其次是rCBV和ADCratio。rCBV和TBRmax联合使用时AUC显著增加。氨基酸PET的诊断准确率最高,与最终诊断的吻合度最高。ADC与PET不一致的占22.9%,rCBV与PET不一致的占16.7%,PET与增强不一致的占14.6%。结论:氨基酸PET对胶质瘤治疗后复发的诊断准确率最高。PET联合MRI进一步提高了AUC,从而提高了诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combined amino acid PET-MRI for identifying recurrence in post-treatment gliomas: together we grow.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of amino acid PET, MR perfusion and diffusion as stand-alone modalities and in combination in identifying recurrence in post-treatment gliomas and to qualitatively assess spatial concordance between the three modalities using simultaneous PET-MR acquisition.

Methods: A retrospective review of 48 cases of post-treatment gliomas who underwent simultaneous PET-MRI using C11 methionine as radiotracer was performed. MR perfusion and diffusion sequences were acquired during the PET study. The following parameters were obtained: TBRmax, TBRmean, SUVmax, and SUVmean from the PET images; rCBV from perfusion; and ADCmean and ADCratio from the diffusion images. The final diagnosis was based on clinical/imaging follow-up and histopathology when available. ROC curve analysis in combination with logistic regression analysis was used to compare the diagnostic performance. Spatial concordance between modalities was graded as 0, 1, and 2 representing discordance, < 50% and > 50% concordance respectively.

Results: There were 35 cases of recurrence and 13 cases of post-treatment changes without recurrence. The highest area under curve (AUC) was obtained for TBRmax followed by rCBV and ADCratio. The AUC increased significantly with a combination of rCBV and TBRmax. Amino acid PET showed the highest diagnostic accuracy and maximum agreement with the final diagnosis. There was discordance between ADC and PET in 22.9%, between rCBV and PET in 16.7% and between PET and contrast enhancement in 14.6% cases.

Conclusion: Amino acid PET had the highest diagnostic accuracy in identifying recurrence in post-treatment gliomas. Combination of PET with MRI further increased the AUC thus improving the diagnostic performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging Computer Science-Computer Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor demonstrated by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in a patient: a case report Carcinoid crisis in Lutetium-177-Dotatate therapy of neuroendocrine tumors: an overview of pathophysiology, risk factors, recognition, and treatment Four-dimensional computed tomography as first-line imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism, a retrospective comparison to conventional imaging in a predominantly single adenoma population Clinical value of semi-quantitative parameters in 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in treatment and diagnostics of cranial meningioma in a single-center retrospective analysis Cardiac transplant rejection assessment with 18F-FDG PET-CT: initial single-centre experience for diagnosis and management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1