耐药癫痫患者抗癫痫药物治疗情况调查。

Journal of epilepsy research Pub Date : 2021-06-30 eCollection Date: 2021-06-01 DOI:10.14581/jer.21010
Jun-Sang Sunwoo, Hyunjin Jo, Kyung Wook Kang, Keun Tae Kim, Daeyoung Kim, Dong Wook Kim, Min-Jee Kim, Saeyoon Kim, Woojun Kim, Hye-Jin Moon, Ha Ree Park, Jung-Ick Byun, Jong-Geun Seo, Sung Chul Lim, Min Kyung Chu, Su-Hyun Han, Kyoung Jin Hwang, Dae-Won Seo
{"title":"耐药癫痫患者抗癫痫药物治疗情况调查。","authors":"Jun-Sang Sunwoo,&nbsp;Hyunjin Jo,&nbsp;Kyung Wook Kang,&nbsp;Keun Tae Kim,&nbsp;Daeyoung Kim,&nbsp;Dong Wook Kim,&nbsp;Min-Jee Kim,&nbsp;Saeyoon Kim,&nbsp;Woojun Kim,&nbsp;Hye-Jin Moon,&nbsp;Ha Ree Park,&nbsp;Jung-Ick Byun,&nbsp;Jong-Geun Seo,&nbsp;Sung Chul Lim,&nbsp;Min Kyung Chu,&nbsp;Su-Hyun Han,&nbsp;Kyoung Jin Hwang,&nbsp;Dae-Won Seo","doi":"10.14581/jer.21010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Individualized anti-epileptic drug (AED) selection in patient with epilepsy is crucial. However, there is no unified opinion in treating patients with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). This survey aimed to make a consolidate consensus with epileptologists' perspectives of the treatment for Korean DRE patients by survey responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was conducted with Korean epilepsy experts who have experience prescribing AEDs via e-mail. Survey questionnaires consisted of six items regarding prescription patterns and practical questions in treating patients with DRE in Korea. The research period was from February 2021 to March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 83.3% (90/108). Most (77.8%) of the responders are neurologists. The proportion of patients whose seizures were not controlled by the second AED was 26.9%. The proportion of patients who had taken five or more AEDs is 13.9%, and those who are currently taking five or more AEDs are 7.3%, of which 54.5% and 37.9% reported positive effects on additional AED, respectively. The majority (91.1%) of respondents answered that the mechanism of action was the top priority factor when adding AED. Regarding data priority, responders considered that expert opinion should have the top priority, followed by clinical experiences, reimbursement guidelines and clinical evidence. Responders gave 64.9 points (range from 0 to 100) about overall satisfaction on reimbursement system of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service for AED.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study on AED therapy for DRE patients is the first nationwide trial in Korean epilepsy experts. In five drug failure, the top priorities on AED selection are mechanism of action and expert opinion. These findings might help to achieve consensus and recognize the insight on optimal therapy of AED in DRE.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/d1/jer-21010.PMC8357558.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey on Antiepileptic Drug Therapy in Patients with Drug Resistant Epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Sang Sunwoo,&nbsp;Hyunjin Jo,&nbsp;Kyung Wook Kang,&nbsp;Keun Tae Kim,&nbsp;Daeyoung Kim,&nbsp;Dong Wook Kim,&nbsp;Min-Jee Kim,&nbsp;Saeyoon Kim,&nbsp;Woojun Kim,&nbsp;Hye-Jin Moon,&nbsp;Ha Ree Park,&nbsp;Jung-Ick Byun,&nbsp;Jong-Geun Seo,&nbsp;Sung Chul Lim,&nbsp;Min Kyung Chu,&nbsp;Su-Hyun Han,&nbsp;Kyoung Jin Hwang,&nbsp;Dae-Won Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.14581/jer.21010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Individualized anti-epileptic drug (AED) selection in patient with epilepsy is crucial. However, there is no unified opinion in treating patients with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). This survey aimed to make a consolidate consensus with epileptologists' perspectives of the treatment for Korean DRE patients by survey responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was conducted with Korean epilepsy experts who have experience prescribing AEDs via e-mail. Survey questionnaires consisted of six items regarding prescription patterns and practical questions in treating patients with DRE in Korea. The research period was from February 2021 to March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 83.3% (90/108). Most (77.8%) of the responders are neurologists. The proportion of patients whose seizures were not controlled by the second AED was 26.9%. The proportion of patients who had taken five or more AEDs is 13.9%, and those who are currently taking five or more AEDs are 7.3%, of which 54.5% and 37.9% reported positive effects on additional AED, respectively. The majority (91.1%) of respondents answered that the mechanism of action was the top priority factor when adding AED. Regarding data priority, responders considered that expert opinion should have the top priority, followed by clinical experiences, reimbursement guidelines and clinical evidence. Responders gave 64.9 points (range from 0 to 100) about overall satisfaction on reimbursement system of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service for AED.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study on AED therapy for DRE patients is the first nationwide trial in Korean epilepsy experts. In five drug failure, the top priorities on AED selection are mechanism of action and expert opinion. These findings might help to achieve consensus and recognize the insight on optimal therapy of AED in DRE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/d1/jer-21010.PMC8357558.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of epilepsy research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.21010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.21010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景与目的:癫痫患者个体化抗癫痫药物(AED)的选择至关重要。然而,在治疗耐药癫痫(DRE)方面没有统一的意见。本调查旨在通过问卷调查结果,巩固与癫痫病医生对韩国DRE患者治疗的共识。方法:通过电子邮件对具有抗癫痫药处方经验的韩国癫痫专家进行调查。调查问卷包括6个项目,涉及处方模式和韩国治疗DRE患者的实际问题。研究时间为2021年2月至2021年3月。结果:调查回复率为83.3%(90/108)。大多数(77.8%)应答者是神经科医生。第2台AED无法控制癫痫发作的患者占26.9%。曾服用5种及以上AED的患者比例为13.9%,目前正在服用5种及以上AED的患者比例为7.3%,其中分别有54.5%和37.9%的患者表示额外服用AED有积极效果。绝大多数(91.1%)的受访者表示,在添加AED时,作用机制是最优先考虑的因素。在数据优先级方面,应答者认为专家意见应具有最高优先级,其次是临床经验、报销指南和临床证据。受访者对健康保险审核评估服务的AED报销制度的总体满意度为64.9分(0 ~ 100分)。结论:AED治疗DRE患者的研究是韩国癫痫专家首次在全国范围内进行的试验。在5种药物失败中,AED的选择优先考虑的是作用机制和专家意见。这些发现可能有助于达成共识并认识到DRE中AED的最佳治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survey on Antiepileptic Drug Therapy in Patients with Drug Resistant Epilepsy.

Background and purpose: Individualized anti-epileptic drug (AED) selection in patient with epilepsy is crucial. However, there is no unified opinion in treating patients with drug resistant epilepsy (DRE). This survey aimed to make a consolidate consensus with epileptologists' perspectives of the treatment for Korean DRE patients by survey responses.

Methods: The survey was conducted with Korean epilepsy experts who have experience prescribing AEDs via e-mail. Survey questionnaires consisted of six items regarding prescription patterns and practical questions in treating patients with DRE in Korea. The research period was from February 2021 to March 2021.

Results: The survey response rate was 83.3% (90/108). Most (77.8%) of the responders are neurologists. The proportion of patients whose seizures were not controlled by the second AED was 26.9%. The proportion of patients who had taken five or more AEDs is 13.9%, and those who are currently taking five or more AEDs are 7.3%, of which 54.5% and 37.9% reported positive effects on additional AED, respectively. The majority (91.1%) of respondents answered that the mechanism of action was the top priority factor when adding AED. Regarding data priority, responders considered that expert opinion should have the top priority, followed by clinical experiences, reimbursement guidelines and clinical evidence. Responders gave 64.9 points (range from 0 to 100) about overall satisfaction on reimbursement system of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service for AED.

Conclusions: This study on AED therapy for DRE patients is the first nationwide trial in Korean epilepsy experts. In five drug failure, the top priorities on AED selection are mechanism of action and expert opinion. These findings might help to achieve consensus and recognize the insight on optimal therapy of AED in DRE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Additive Anticonvulsive Effects of Sumatriptan and Morphine on Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Clonic Seizures in Mice. Cerebral Folate Transport Deficiency in 2 Cases with Intractable Myoclonic Epilepsy. Gyratory Seizures in Hypothalamic Hamartoma. Laughter-Induced Seizures: A Rare Type of Reflex Epilepsy. Medication Reconciliation Errors on Discharge for Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1