沙特阿拉伯西南部某三级医院血清阳性类风湿性关节炎患者对不同治疗策略的反应模式:一项回顾性研究

IF 1.7 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2021-08-14 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OARRR.S322833
Mohammed AlOmair, Hanan AlMalki, Nouf AlShamrani, Ghadah Habtar, Maram AlAsmari, Wejdan Mobasher, Hanan AlQahtani, Aydah Rahman, Alhussain Asiri
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯西南部某三级医院血清阳性类风湿性关节炎患者对不同治疗策略的反应模式:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Mohammed AlOmair,&nbsp;Hanan AlMalki,&nbsp;Nouf AlShamrani,&nbsp;Ghadah Habtar,&nbsp;Maram AlAsmari,&nbsp;Wejdan Mobasher,&nbsp;Hanan AlQahtani,&nbsp;Aydah Rahman,&nbsp;Alhussain Asiri","doi":"10.2147/OARRR.S322833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the pattern of response to different treatment strategies in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to describe our clinical practice in RA management.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Over a period of two years from April 2018 to April 2020, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data for 288 consecutive seropositive RA patients attending rheumatology clinics and the daycare unit at Aseer Central Hospital. Data were collected on patient demographics, disease duration, extraarticular manifestations, comorbidities and treatment. Disease activity was assessed using the clinical disease activity index (CDAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the total 288 patients, 42% (120) are on csDMRADs, while 54% (162) are on bDMRADs and 4% (6) are on tsDMARDs. Of the patients on csDMARDS, 51%, 43% and 7% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. However, of the patients on non-csDMARDS, 36.3%, 49.4% and 14.3% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. Failure of csDMARDs was affected by the presence of high disease activity at baseline, extraarticular lung manifestations and coexistent fibromyalgia, with a significant effect of the latter on remission rate. Among patients on non-csDMARDs, 42 (25%) showed one or more therapy changes. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were the predominant first-line agents in biologically naive patients (65%) followed by abatacept (18%). Abatacept was the most frequently prescribed second biologic in 52% of cases followed by tocilizumab in 19%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current clinical practice in our hospital is consistent with the latest American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines. Treat-to-target strategy was achieved in the vast majority of our patients, while remission was observed in almost half of the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45545,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","volume":"13 ","pages":"239-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/64/oarrr-13-239.PMC8374534.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Response to Different Treatment Strategies in Seropositive Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in South-Western Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed AlOmair,&nbsp;Hanan AlMalki,&nbsp;Nouf AlShamrani,&nbsp;Ghadah Habtar,&nbsp;Maram AlAsmari,&nbsp;Wejdan Mobasher,&nbsp;Hanan AlQahtani,&nbsp;Aydah Rahman,&nbsp;Alhussain Asiri\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OARRR.S322833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To study the pattern of response to different treatment strategies in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to describe our clinical practice in RA management.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Over a period of two years from April 2018 to April 2020, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data for 288 consecutive seropositive RA patients attending rheumatology clinics and the daycare unit at Aseer Central Hospital. Data were collected on patient demographics, disease duration, extraarticular manifestations, comorbidities and treatment. Disease activity was assessed using the clinical disease activity index (CDAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the total 288 patients, 42% (120) are on csDMRADs, while 54% (162) are on bDMRADs and 4% (6) are on tsDMARDs. Of the patients on csDMARDS, 51%, 43% and 7% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. However, of the patients on non-csDMARDS, 36.3%, 49.4% and 14.3% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. Failure of csDMARDs was affected by the presence of high disease activity at baseline, extraarticular lung manifestations and coexistent fibromyalgia, with a significant effect of the latter on remission rate. Among patients on non-csDMARDs, 42 (25%) showed one or more therapy changes. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were the predominant first-line agents in biologically naive patients (65%) followed by abatacept (18%). Abatacept was the most frequently prescribed second biologic in 52% of cases followed by tocilizumab in 19%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current clinical practice in our hospital is consistent with the latest American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines. Treat-to-target strategy was achieved in the vast majority of our patients, while remission was observed in almost half of the patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"239-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/64/oarrr-13-239.PMC8374534.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S322833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Rheumatology-Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S322833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:研究血清阳性类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者对不同治疗策略的反应模式,并描述我们在RA治疗方面的临床实践。患者和方法:在2018年4月至2020年4月的两年时间里,我们对在Aseer中心医院风湿病诊所和日托中心就诊的288例连续血清阳性RA患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。收集有关患者人口统计学、病程、关节外表现、合并症和治疗的数据。采用临床疾病活动性指数(CDAI)评估疾病活动性。结果:288例患者中,42%(120例)使用csdmrad, 54%(162例)使用bdmrad, 4%(6例)使用tsdmard。在接受csDMARDS治疗的患者中,分别有51%、43%和7%的患者处于缓解期、低活动性和中度活动性。然而,在非csdmards患者中,分别有36.3%、49.4%和14.3%的患者处于缓解期、低活动性和中度活动性。csDMARDs的失败受基线时高疾病活动性、关节外肺表现和共存的纤维肌痛的影响,后者对缓解率有显著影响。在接受非csdmard治疗的患者中,42例(25%)出现一种或多种治疗变化。肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂是生物学初始患者的主要一线药物(65%),其次是阿巴接受(18%)。Abatacept是最常用的第二种生物制剂,占52%,其次是托珠单抗,占19%。结论:我院目前的临床实践符合最新的美国风湿病学会(ACR)/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)指南。治疗目标策略在绝大多数患者中实现,而几乎一半的患者观察到缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patterns of Response to Different Treatment Strategies in Seropositive Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Tertiary Hospital in South-Western Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study.

Purpose: To study the pattern of response to different treatment strategies in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to describe our clinical practice in RA management.

Patients and methods: Over a period of two years from April 2018 to April 2020, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data for 288 consecutive seropositive RA patients attending rheumatology clinics and the daycare unit at Aseer Central Hospital. Data were collected on patient demographics, disease duration, extraarticular manifestations, comorbidities and treatment. Disease activity was assessed using the clinical disease activity index (CDAI).

Results: Out of the total 288 patients, 42% (120) are on csDMRADs, while 54% (162) are on bDMRADs and 4% (6) are on tsDMARDs. Of the patients on csDMARDS, 51%, 43% and 7% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. However, of the patients on non-csDMARDS, 36.3%, 49.4% and 14.3% of them were on remission, low and moderate disease activity, respectively. Failure of csDMARDs was affected by the presence of high disease activity at baseline, extraarticular lung manifestations and coexistent fibromyalgia, with a significant effect of the latter on remission rate. Among patients on non-csDMARDs, 42 (25%) showed one or more therapy changes. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were the predominant first-line agents in biologically naive patients (65%) followed by abatacept (18%). Abatacept was the most frequently prescribed second biologic in 52% of cases followed by tocilizumab in 19%.

Conclusion: The current clinical practice in our hospital is consistent with the latest American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines. Treat-to-target strategy was achieved in the vast majority of our patients, while remission was observed in almost half of the patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Safety of Tocilizumab on Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease. Tofacitinib Monotherapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Clinical Trials and Real-World Data Contextualization of Patients, Efficacy, and Treatment Retention. Cold Air Plasma Inhibiting Tumor-Like Biological Behavior of Rheumatoid Arthritis Fibroblast-Like Synovial Cells via G2/M Cell Cycle Arrest. JAK-Inhibitors - A Story of Success and Adverse Events. Adverse Impact of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Saudi Arabia Retrospective Multi-Center Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1