{"title":"人造纤维炭与竹炭对污水中电流回收的比较评价。","authors":"Wataru Nagahashi, Naoko Yoshida","doi":"10.2323/jgam.2021.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, two fibrous carbon anodes (namely, pleated non-woven graphite (PNWG) and carbon brush (CB) made from artificial carbon) and bamboo charcoal (BC) were evaluated for current recovery from sewage wastewater. When these anodes were polarized at 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl in sewage wastewater, CB produced a maximum current of 2.9 A/m<sup>2</sup>. This exceeded that produced by PNWG (1.5 A/m<sup>2</sup>) and BC (1.4 A/m<sup>2</sup>). The accumulative charge recovery achieved with CB was superior to those achieved with the other two (1.6- and 2.2-fold higher than that with PNWG and BC, respectively). During the cyclic voltammetry analysis, CB demonstrated the highest catalytic current with maximum potential in the range of -0.6 to 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl and the smallest anode resistance (0.20 Ωm<sup>2</sup>). Direct cell counting revealed that the fibrous anodes (CB and PNWG) attached most of the cells in the anodes (80%), whereas BC did not. In contrast, the proportion of Geobacter species, a representative electrogenic microorganism in the total bacteria, was observed to be similar among the three anodes (4.4-5.8%). The tubular microbial fuel cell (ø 5.0 cm) equipped with an air-chamber core wrapped with an anion exchange membrane (AEM) and the CB delivered a current of 1.8 A/m<sup>2</sup>. This is higher than those reported in the existing literature for the same microbial fuel cell (MFC) configuration. This indicates that the alteration of the anode from planar to brush can contribute toward improving the current recovery through the air-cathode-AEM-MFC. The BC needs improvement to have more specific surface area, whereas it showed superiority in cost efficiency considering material and processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":15842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General and Applied Microbiology","volume":"67 6","pages":"248-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of fibrous artificial carbons and bamboo charcoal in terms of recovery of current from sewage wastewater.\",\"authors\":\"Wataru Nagahashi, Naoko Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.2323/jgam.2021.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, two fibrous carbon anodes (namely, pleated non-woven graphite (PNWG) and carbon brush (CB) made from artificial carbon) and bamboo charcoal (BC) were evaluated for current recovery from sewage wastewater. When these anodes were polarized at 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl in sewage wastewater, CB produced a maximum current of 2.9 A/m<sup>2</sup>. This exceeded that produced by PNWG (1.5 A/m<sup>2</sup>) and BC (1.4 A/m<sup>2</sup>). The accumulative charge recovery achieved with CB was superior to those achieved with the other two (1.6- and 2.2-fold higher than that with PNWG and BC, respectively). During the cyclic voltammetry analysis, CB demonstrated the highest catalytic current with maximum potential in the range of -0.6 to 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl and the smallest anode resistance (0.20 Ωm<sup>2</sup>). Direct cell counting revealed that the fibrous anodes (CB and PNWG) attached most of the cells in the anodes (80%), whereas BC did not. In contrast, the proportion of Geobacter species, a representative electrogenic microorganism in the total bacteria, was observed to be similar among the three anodes (4.4-5.8%). The tubular microbial fuel cell (ø 5.0 cm) equipped with an air-chamber core wrapped with an anion exchange membrane (AEM) and the CB delivered a current of 1.8 A/m<sup>2</sup>. This is higher than those reported in the existing literature for the same microbial fuel cell (MFC) configuration. This indicates that the alteration of the anode from planar to brush can contribute toward improving the current recovery through the air-cathode-AEM-MFC. The BC needs improvement to have more specific surface area, whereas it showed superiority in cost efficiency considering material and processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General and Applied Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"67 6\",\"pages\":\"248-255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General and Applied Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.2021.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General and Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.2021.05.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本研究对两种纤维碳阳极(即人造碳制成的褶皱无纺布石墨(PNWG)和碳刷(CB))和竹炭(BC)进行了电流回收研究。当这些阳极在0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl下极化时,CB产生的最大电流为2.9 a /m2。这超过了PNWG (1.5 A/m2)和BC (1.4 A/m2)。炭黑的累计电荷回收率分别是PNWG和BC的1.6倍和2.2倍。在循环伏安分析中,CB对Ag/AgCl的催化电流最高,最大电位在-0.6 ~ 0.4 V范围内,阳极电阻最小(0.20 Ωm2)。直接细胞计数显示纤维阳极(CB和PNWG)与阳极中的大部分细胞(80%)相连,而BC则没有。而产电微生物Geobacter菌种占总菌群的比例在3个阳极间基本一致(4.4 ~ 5.8%)。管状微生物燃料电池(ø 5.0 cm)配备一个包裹阴离子交换膜(AEM)的气室芯,CB输出电流为1.8 a /m2。这高于现有文献报道的相同微生物燃料电池(MFC)配置。这表明,将阳极由平面改为电刷有助于提高空气阴极- aem - mfc的电流回收率。BC需要改进以获得更大的比表面积,而考虑到材料和加工,它在成本效率方面表现出优势。
Comparative evaluation of fibrous artificial carbons and bamboo charcoal in terms of recovery of current from sewage wastewater.
In this study, two fibrous carbon anodes (namely, pleated non-woven graphite (PNWG) and carbon brush (CB) made from artificial carbon) and bamboo charcoal (BC) were evaluated for current recovery from sewage wastewater. When these anodes were polarized at 0.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl in sewage wastewater, CB produced a maximum current of 2.9 A/m2. This exceeded that produced by PNWG (1.5 A/m2) and BC (1.4 A/m2). The accumulative charge recovery achieved with CB was superior to those achieved with the other two (1.6- and 2.2-fold higher than that with PNWG and BC, respectively). During the cyclic voltammetry analysis, CB demonstrated the highest catalytic current with maximum potential in the range of -0.6 to 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl and the smallest anode resistance (0.20 Ωm2). Direct cell counting revealed that the fibrous anodes (CB and PNWG) attached most of the cells in the anodes (80%), whereas BC did not. In contrast, the proportion of Geobacter species, a representative electrogenic microorganism in the total bacteria, was observed to be similar among the three anodes (4.4-5.8%). The tubular microbial fuel cell (ø 5.0 cm) equipped with an air-chamber core wrapped with an anion exchange membrane (AEM) and the CB delivered a current of 1.8 A/m2. This is higher than those reported in the existing literature for the same microbial fuel cell (MFC) configuration. This indicates that the alteration of the anode from planar to brush can contribute toward improving the current recovery through the air-cathode-AEM-MFC. The BC needs improvement to have more specific surface area, whereas it showed superiority in cost efficiency considering material and processing.
期刊介绍:
JGAM is going to publish scientific reports containing novel and significant microbiological findings, which are mainly devoted to the following categories: Antibiotics and Secondary Metabolites; Biotechnology and Metabolic Engineering; Developmental Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Bioremediation; Enzymology; Eukaryotic Microbiology; Evolution and Phylogenetics; Genome Integrity and Plasticity; Microalgae and Photosynthesis; Microbiology for Food; Molecular Genetics; Physiology and Cell Surface; Synthetic and Systems Microbiology.