Kylesh D Pegu, Helen Perrie, Juan Scribante, Maria Fourtounas
{"title":"某中心医院手术室医护人员手上的微生物污染。","authors":"Kylesh D Pegu, Helen Perrie, Juan Scribante, Maria Fourtounas","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v36i1.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effort is invested in maintaining the sterility of the operating field, but less attention is paid to potential healthcare associated infection (HAI) sources through patient contact with non-scrubbed healthcare providers (HCPs). A single microbiological assessment of hands can provide a good assessment of the potential dynamic transmission of microorganisms. The aim of this study was to identify and quantify the microbial growth on the hands of HCPs in the operating theatres of Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, contextual and descriptive study design was followed. Seventy-five samples were collected using convenience sampling from an equal number of surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses. Specimens were taken using agar plates and underwent semi-quantitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the hands of the HCPs displayed growth; 95% grew commensals and 64% grew pathogens. Eighteen commensal microorganisms and 21 pathological microorganisms were noted. Comparisons of commensal, pathological and combined levels of contamination among the three groups were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.061, <i>p</i> = 0.481, <i>p</i> = 0.236). No significant difference between the growth of combined microorganisms (<i>p</i> = 0.634) and pathological microorganisms (<i>p</i> = 0.499) among the groups. Surgeons had significantly more commensal growth (<i>p</i> = 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference between sexes (<i>p</i> = 0.290).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was concerning that 100% of the hands of HCPs who were about to commence with the surgical list had microbial growth. These HCPs could have already been in contact with patients and equipment in the theatre environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"36 1","pages":"221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378170/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbial contamination of the hands of healthcare providers in the operating theatre of a central hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Kylesh D Pegu, Helen Perrie, Juan Scribante, Maria Fourtounas\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajid.v36i1.221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effort is invested in maintaining the sterility of the operating field, but less attention is paid to potential healthcare associated infection (HAI) sources through patient contact with non-scrubbed healthcare providers (HCPs). A single microbiological assessment of hands can provide a good assessment of the potential dynamic transmission of microorganisms. The aim of this study was to identify and quantify the microbial growth on the hands of HCPs in the operating theatres of Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, contextual and descriptive study design was followed. Seventy-five samples were collected using convenience sampling from an equal number of surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses. Specimens were taken using agar plates and underwent semi-quantitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the hands of the HCPs displayed growth; 95% grew commensals and 64% grew pathogens. Eighteen commensal microorganisms and 21 pathological microorganisms were noted. Comparisons of commensal, pathological and combined levels of contamination among the three groups were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.061, <i>p</i> = 0.481, <i>p</i> = 0.236). No significant difference between the growth of combined microorganisms (<i>p</i> = 0.634) and pathological microorganisms (<i>p</i> = 0.499) among the groups. Surgeons had significantly more commensal growth (<i>p</i> = 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference between sexes (<i>p</i> = 0.290).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was concerning that 100% of the hands of HCPs who were about to commence with the surgical list had microbial growth. These HCPs could have already been in contact with patients and equipment in the theatre environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8378170/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v36i1.221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v36i1.221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
背景:努力投入到保持操作场所的无菌,但很少关注通过患者与未经擦洗的医疗保健提供者(HCPs)接触的潜在医疗保健相关感染(HAI)来源。对手部的单一微生物学评估可以很好地评估微生物的潜在动态传播。本研究的目的是确定和量化Chris Hani Baragwanath学术医院手术室中医护人员手上的微生物生长情况。方法:采用前瞻性、情境性和描述性研究设计。采用方便抽样法,从同等数量的外科医生、麻醉师和护士中收集了75份样本。采用琼脂平板采集标本,进行半定量分析。结果:HCPs手均有生长;95%生长共生菌,64%生长病原菌。共检出共生微生物18种,病理微生物21种。三组间共染、病理及综合污染水平比较无统计学意义(p = 0.061, p = 0.481, p = 0.236)。组合微生物的生长(p = 0.634)与病理微生物的生长(p = 0.499)组间无显著差异。外科医生有更多的共生生长(p = 0.041)。性别间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.290)。结论:在即将开始手术的医护人员中,100%的手部有微生物生长,值得关注。这些医护人员可能已经在手术室环境中接触过病人和设备。
Microbial contamination of the hands of healthcare providers in the operating theatre of a central hospital.
Background: Effort is invested in maintaining the sterility of the operating field, but less attention is paid to potential healthcare associated infection (HAI) sources through patient contact with non-scrubbed healthcare providers (HCPs). A single microbiological assessment of hands can provide a good assessment of the potential dynamic transmission of microorganisms. The aim of this study was to identify and quantify the microbial growth on the hands of HCPs in the operating theatres of Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital.
Methods: A prospective, contextual and descriptive study design was followed. Seventy-five samples were collected using convenience sampling from an equal number of surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses. Specimens were taken using agar plates and underwent semi-quantitative analysis.
Results: All the hands of the HCPs displayed growth; 95% grew commensals and 64% grew pathogens. Eighteen commensal microorganisms and 21 pathological microorganisms were noted. Comparisons of commensal, pathological and combined levels of contamination among the three groups were not statistically significant (p = 0.061, p = 0.481, p = 0.236). No significant difference between the growth of combined microorganisms (p = 0.634) and pathological microorganisms (p = 0.499) among the groups. Surgeons had significantly more commensal growth (p = 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference between sexes (p = 0.290).
Conclusion: It was concerning that 100% of the hands of HCPs who were about to commence with the surgical list had microbial growth. These HCPs could have already been in contact with patients and equipment in the theatre environment.