[噬菌体治疗骨和假体周围感染:系统综述]。

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Orthopade Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s00132-021-04148-y
Nike Walter, Li Deng, Christoph Brochhausen, Volker Alt, Markus Rupp
{"title":"[噬菌体治疗骨和假体周围感染:系统综述]。","authors":"Nike Walter,&nbsp;Li Deng,&nbsp;Christoph Brochhausen,&nbsp;Volker Alt,&nbsp;Markus Rupp","doi":"10.1007/s00132-021-04148-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of bone and prosthesis infections remains difficult despite modern treatment concepts. Further tools for the improvement of treatment outcome are desirable. Preclinical studies provide promising evidence of the efficacy of bacteriophages for the treatment of bone and joint infections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present work provides a systematic review of the clinical application of bacteriophages for the treatment of bone and joint infections.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed to identify primary clinical data on the use of phage therapy in patients with bone and joint infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight case reports and three case series were included in the study. Indications for phage therapy were periprosthetic joint infection (n = 12, 52.2%), fracture-related infection (n = 9, 39.1%), osteomyelitis (n = 1, 4.4%) and sacroiliac joint infection after cement augmentation of a metastasis (n = 1, 4.4%). Interventions were heterogeneous; phages were administered intravenously, injected intraoperatively into the joint, applied locally intraoperatively, or administered via drains. In combination with antibiotic therapy, complete infection eradication was achieved in 18 patients (78.3%). No side effects were reported in 91.3% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bacteriophages represent a promising treatment option for bone and prosthesis infections in combination with antibiotic therapy. Future clinical trials with a higher level of evidence are required for the successful translation of bacteriophage therapy into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopade","volume":"51 2","pages":"138-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821479/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Treatment of bone and periprosthetic infections with bacteriophages : A systematic review].\",\"authors\":\"Nike Walter,&nbsp;Li Deng,&nbsp;Christoph Brochhausen,&nbsp;Volker Alt,&nbsp;Markus Rupp\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00132-021-04148-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment of bone and prosthesis infections remains difficult despite modern treatment concepts. Further tools for the improvement of treatment outcome are desirable. Preclinical studies provide promising evidence of the efficacy of bacteriophages for the treatment of bone and joint infections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present work provides a systematic review of the clinical application of bacteriophages for the treatment of bone and joint infections.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed to identify primary clinical data on the use of phage therapy in patients with bone and joint infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight case reports and three case series were included in the study. Indications for phage therapy were periprosthetic joint infection (n = 12, 52.2%), fracture-related infection (n = 9, 39.1%), osteomyelitis (n = 1, 4.4%) and sacroiliac joint infection after cement augmentation of a metastasis (n = 1, 4.4%). Interventions were heterogeneous; phages were administered intravenously, injected intraoperatively into the joint, applied locally intraoperatively, or administered via drains. In combination with antibiotic therapy, complete infection eradication was achieved in 18 patients (78.3%). No side effects were reported in 91.3% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bacteriophages represent a promising treatment option for bone and prosthesis infections in combination with antibiotic therapy. Future clinical trials with a higher level of evidence are required for the successful translation of bacteriophage therapy into clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopade\",\"volume\":\"51 2\",\"pages\":\"138-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821479/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04148-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopade","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-021-04148-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:尽管有现代的治疗理念,骨和假体感染的治疗仍然很困难。改善治疗结果的进一步工具是可取的。临床前研究为噬菌体治疗骨和关节感染的疗效提供了有希望的证据。目的:对噬菌体治疗骨关节感染的临床应用进行系统综述。材料和方法:在PubMed上进行了系统的搜索,以确定在骨和关节感染患者中使用噬菌体治疗的主要临床数据。结果:8例病例报告和3个病例系列纳入研究。噬菌体治疗的适应症为假体周围关节感染(n = 12,52.2%)、骨折相关感染(n = 9,39.1%)、骨髓炎(n = 1,4.4%)和骨水泥增强转移后的骶髂关节感染(n = 1,4.4%)。干预措施是异质性的;噬菌体通过静脉注射、术中注射到关节、术中局部应用或通过引流管给药。结合抗生素治疗,18例患者(78.3%)完全根除感染。91.3%的患者无副作用。结论:噬菌体联合抗生素治疗骨和假体感染是一种很有前景的治疗选择。未来的临床试验需要更高水平的证据,以成功地将噬菌体治疗转化为临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Treatment of bone and periprosthetic infections with bacteriophages : A systematic review].

Background: The treatment of bone and prosthesis infections remains difficult despite modern treatment concepts. Further tools for the improvement of treatment outcome are desirable. Preclinical studies provide promising evidence of the efficacy of bacteriophages for the treatment of bone and joint infections.

Objectives: The present work provides a systematic review of the clinical application of bacteriophages for the treatment of bone and joint infections.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed to identify primary clinical data on the use of phage therapy in patients with bone and joint infection.

Results: Eight case reports and three case series were included in the study. Indications for phage therapy were periprosthetic joint infection (n = 12, 52.2%), fracture-related infection (n = 9, 39.1%), osteomyelitis (n = 1, 4.4%) and sacroiliac joint infection after cement augmentation of a metastasis (n = 1, 4.4%). Interventions were heterogeneous; phages were administered intravenously, injected intraoperatively into the joint, applied locally intraoperatively, or administered via drains. In combination with antibiotic therapy, complete infection eradication was achieved in 18 patients (78.3%). No side effects were reported in 91.3% of patients.

Conclusion: Bacteriophages represent a promising treatment option for bone and prosthesis infections in combination with antibiotic therapy. Future clinical trials with a higher level of evidence are required for the successful translation of bacteriophage therapy into clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopade
Orthopade 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Orthopäde is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of orthopaedics and its neighboring areas. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of orthopaedists. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange. Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
期刊最新文献
[The role of the Internet as a source of medical information for orthopedic patients]. Labrumläsionen bei femoroazetabulärem Impingement-Syndrom: evidenzbasierte Therapie [Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physiotherapeutic and medical follow-up care after reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament]. [Surgical treatment of a symptomatic intra-articular osteoid osteoma (IAOO)]. Fast-Track in der Hüft- und Kniegelenkendoprothetik
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1