认知储备对中枢神经系统疾病患者认知的影响。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.1097/WNN.0000000000000282
Varna R Jammula, Heather Leeper, Mark R Gilbert, Diane Cooper, Terri S Armstrong
{"title":"认知储备对中枢神经系统疾病患者认知的影响。","authors":"Varna R Jammula,&nbsp;Heather Leeper,&nbsp;Mark R Gilbert,&nbsp;Diane Cooper,&nbsp;Terri S Armstrong","doi":"10.1097/WNN.0000000000000282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive reserve (CR) has been proposed to account for functional outcome differences in brain pathology and its clinical manifestations. The purpose of our paper is to systematically review the effects of CR on cognitive outcomes in individuals with neurodegenerative and structural CNS diseases. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and PsychInfo using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Seventeen studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria and were selected for review. Education level was the most commonly used measure for CR, and various neuropsychological tests were used to measure cognitive outcomes. Regardless of the CNS disease of the individuals, almost all of the studies reported a positive association between CR and cognitive outcomes when they were evaluated cross-sectionally. However, when evaluated longitudinally, CR had either no effect on, or a negative association with, cognitive outcomes. Based on studies across a broad spectrum of CNS diseases, our findings suggest that CR may serve as a predictor of cognitive outcomes in individuals with CNS diseases. However, studies to date are limited by a lack of imaging analyses and standardized assessment strategies. The ability to use a standardized measure to assess the longitudinal effects of CR may allow for the development of more targeted treatment methods, resulting in improved disease outcomes for individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50671,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635253/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Cognitive Reserve on Cognition in Individuals With Central Nervous System Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Varna R Jammula,&nbsp;Heather Leeper,&nbsp;Mark R Gilbert,&nbsp;Diane Cooper,&nbsp;Terri S Armstrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNN.0000000000000282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cognitive reserve (CR) has been proposed to account for functional outcome differences in brain pathology and its clinical manifestations. The purpose of our paper is to systematically review the effects of CR on cognitive outcomes in individuals with neurodegenerative and structural CNS diseases. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and PsychInfo using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Seventeen studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria and were selected for review. Education level was the most commonly used measure for CR, and various neuropsychological tests were used to measure cognitive outcomes. Regardless of the CNS disease of the individuals, almost all of the studies reported a positive association between CR and cognitive outcomes when they were evaluated cross-sectionally. However, when evaluated longitudinally, CR had either no effect on, or a negative association with, cognitive outcomes. Based on studies across a broad spectrum of CNS diseases, our findings suggest that CR may serve as a predictor of cognitive outcomes in individuals with CNS diseases. However, studies to date are limited by a lack of imaging analyses and standardized assessment strategies. The ability to use a standardized measure to assess the longitudinal effects of CR may allow for the development of more targeted treatment methods, resulting in improved disease outcomes for individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635253/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000282\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000282","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

认知储备(CR)已被提出用于解释大脑病理学及其临床表现中的功能结果差异。我们论文的目的是系统地回顾CR对神经退行性和结构性中枢神经系统疾病患者认知结果的影响。我们使用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南对PubMed、CINAHL(护理和相关健康文献的累积指数)和PsychInfo进行了系统搜索。17项研究符合预定的纳入标准,并被选中进行审查。教育水平是CR最常用的衡量标准,各种神经心理学测试用于衡量认知结果。无论个体的中枢神经系统疾病如何,当对其进行横断面评估时,几乎所有的研究都报告了CR与认知结果之间的正相关。然而,当纵向评估时,CR对认知结果没有影响,或者与认知结果呈负相关。基于对广泛中枢神经系统疾病的研究,我们的研究结果表明,CR可能是中枢神经系统患者认知结果的预测指标。然而,迄今为止的研究受到缺乏成像分析和标准化评估策略的限制。使用标准化测量来评估CR的纵向影响的能力可能允许开发更有针对性的治疗方法,从而改善个体的疾病结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Cognitive Reserve on Cognition in Individuals With Central Nervous System Disease.

Cognitive reserve (CR) has been proposed to account for functional outcome differences in brain pathology and its clinical manifestations. The purpose of our paper is to systematically review the effects of CR on cognitive outcomes in individuals with neurodegenerative and structural CNS diseases. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and PsychInfo using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Seventeen studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria and were selected for review. Education level was the most commonly used measure for CR, and various neuropsychological tests were used to measure cognitive outcomes. Regardless of the CNS disease of the individuals, almost all of the studies reported a positive association between CR and cognitive outcomes when they were evaluated cross-sectionally. However, when evaluated longitudinally, CR had either no effect on, or a negative association with, cognitive outcomes. Based on studies across a broad spectrum of CNS diseases, our findings suggest that CR may serve as a predictor of cognitive outcomes in individuals with CNS diseases. However, studies to date are limited by a lack of imaging analyses and standardized assessment strategies. The ability to use a standardized measure to assess the longitudinal effects of CR may allow for the development of more targeted treatment methods, resulting in improved disease outcomes for individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology (CBN) is a forum for advances in the neurologic understanding and possible treatment of human disorders that affect thinking, learning, memory, communication, and behavior. As an incubator for innovations in these fields, CBN helps transform theory into practice. The journal serves clinical research, patient care, education, and professional advancement. The journal welcomes contributions from neurology, cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and other relevant fields. The editors particularly encourage review articles (including reviews of clinical practice), experimental and observational case reports, instructional articles for interested students and professionals in other fields, and innovative articles that do not fit neatly into any category. Also welcome are therapeutic trials and other experimental and observational studies, brief reports, first-person accounts of neurologic experiences, position papers, hypotheses, opinion papers, commentaries, historical perspectives, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Free-listing and Semantic Knowledge: A Tool for Detecting Alzheimer Disease? The Banana Lady and Other Stories of Curious Behavior and Speech. Threatening an Illusory Limb: An Event-related Potential Study of the Rubber Hand Illusion. Cortical Thickness Correlates of Go/No-go and Motor Sequencing in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Suspected Alzheimer Disease Dementia. The Cotard Delusion in a Patient With Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: The Challenges of Autoimmune Psychosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1