用TearLab渗透计评价糖尿病患者的泪膜渗透性。

IF 1.4 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical Optometry Pub Date : 2021-09-01 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTO.S325768
Ali Abusharha, Ali Alsaqar, Raied Fagehi, Mohammad Alobaid, Ali Almayouf, Sulaiman Alajlan, Mossab Omair, Essa Alahmad, Ali Masmali
{"title":"用TearLab渗透计评价糖尿病患者的泪膜渗透性。","authors":"Ali Abusharha,&nbsp;Ali Alsaqar,&nbsp;Raied Fagehi,&nbsp;Mohammad Alobaid,&nbsp;Ali Almayouf,&nbsp;Sulaiman Alajlan,&nbsp;Mossab Omair,&nbsp;Essa Alahmad,&nbsp;Ali Masmali","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S325768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus on tear osmolarity using a TearLab Osmolarity system. Moreover, the relationship between tear film osmolarity and ocular surface discomfort in controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients was assessed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 20 male type 2 diabetic patients aged 20 to 70 years (mean ± SD 49±12). A control group (18-43 years; 32.2 ± 6.5 years) consisting of 40 male subjects was also enrolled for comparison. The tear osmolarity was measured using the TearLab Osmolarity System. The ocular surface disease index questionnaire (OSDI) was used to assess ocular discomfort symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tear osmolarity was 297 ± 8.00 and 296 ± 11 mOsm/L for controlled and uncontrolled diabetic subjects, respectively, while the average osmolarity in the control group was 299 ± 8.00 mOsm/L. No significant differences were detected in tear osmolarity between the control and diabetes groups. The ocular surface disease index questionnaire (OSDI) score was significantly higher in the diabetic patient group. No significant correlation was found between tear osmolarity and OSDI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ocular discomfort symptoms score in diabetic patients was significantly higher compared to normal eye subjects. Tear osmolarity was not significantly different in diabetic patients. This finding may be explained by a lack of relationship between tear film parameters and diabetic severity; tear film parameters may correlate more with diabetic duration rather than severity. Therefore, studies focused on diabetes duration and tear film parameters are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"13 ","pages":"257-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/7b/opto-13-257.PMC8420776.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Tear Film Osmolarity Among Diabetic Patients Using a TearLab Osmometer.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Abusharha,&nbsp;Ali Alsaqar,&nbsp;Raied Fagehi,&nbsp;Mohammad Alobaid,&nbsp;Ali Almayouf,&nbsp;Sulaiman Alajlan,&nbsp;Mossab Omair,&nbsp;Essa Alahmad,&nbsp;Ali Masmali\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTO.S325768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus on tear osmolarity using a TearLab Osmolarity system. Moreover, the relationship between tear film osmolarity and ocular surface discomfort in controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients was assessed.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study included 20 male type 2 diabetic patients aged 20 to 70 years (mean ± SD 49±12). A control group (18-43 years; 32.2 ± 6.5 years) consisting of 40 male subjects was also enrolled for comparison. The tear osmolarity was measured using the TearLab Osmolarity System. The ocular surface disease index questionnaire (OSDI) was used to assess ocular discomfort symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tear osmolarity was 297 ± 8.00 and 296 ± 11 mOsm/L for controlled and uncontrolled diabetic subjects, respectively, while the average osmolarity in the control group was 299 ± 8.00 mOsm/L. No significant differences were detected in tear osmolarity between the control and diabetes groups. The ocular surface disease index questionnaire (OSDI) score was significantly higher in the diabetic patient group. No significant correlation was found between tear osmolarity and OSDI scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ocular discomfort symptoms score in diabetic patients was significantly higher compared to normal eye subjects. Tear osmolarity was not significantly different in diabetic patients. This finding may be explained by a lack of relationship between tear film parameters and diabetic severity; tear film parameters may correlate more with diabetic duration rather than severity. Therefore, studies focused on diabetes duration and tear film parameters are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Optometry\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"257-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/7b/opto-13-257.PMC8420776.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S325768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S325768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是使用TearLab渗透压系统确定2型糖尿病对泪液渗透压的影响。此外,我们还评估了控制和未控制糖尿病患者泪膜渗透压与眼表不适的关系。材料与方法:本研究纳入20例20 ~ 70岁男性2型糖尿病患者(mean±SD 49±12)。对照组18-43岁;(32.2±6.5岁)40名男性受试者也入组进行比较。泪液渗透压测量采用TearLab渗透压系统。采用眼表疾病指数问卷(OSDI)评估眼部不适症状。结果:糖尿病控制组和非控制组的平均泪液渗透压分别为297±8.00和296±11 mOsm/L,对照组的平均渗透压为299±8.00 mOsm/L。泪液渗透压在对照组和糖尿病组之间没有显著差异。糖尿病组眼表疾病指数问卷(OSDI)得分显著高于糖尿病组。泪液渗透压与OSDI评分无显著相关性。结论:糖尿病患者眼部不适症状评分明显高于正常眼人。糖尿病患者的泪液渗透压差异无统计学意义。这一发现可以解释为泪膜参数与糖尿病严重程度之间缺乏关系;泪膜参数可能与糖尿病病程相关,而不是与严重程度相关。因此,建议关注糖尿病病程和泪膜参数的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Tear Film Osmolarity Among Diabetic Patients Using a TearLab Osmometer.

Purpose: The purpose of the present study is to determine the effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus on tear osmolarity using a TearLab Osmolarity system. Moreover, the relationship between tear film osmolarity and ocular surface discomfort in controlled and uncontrolled diabetic patients was assessed.

Materials and methods: This study included 20 male type 2 diabetic patients aged 20 to 70 years (mean ± SD 49±12). A control group (18-43 years; 32.2 ± 6.5 years) consisting of 40 male subjects was also enrolled for comparison. The tear osmolarity was measured using the TearLab Osmolarity System. The ocular surface disease index questionnaire (OSDI) was used to assess ocular discomfort symptoms.

Results: The mean tear osmolarity was 297 ± 8.00 and 296 ± 11 mOsm/L for controlled and uncontrolled diabetic subjects, respectively, while the average osmolarity in the control group was 299 ± 8.00 mOsm/L. No significant differences were detected in tear osmolarity between the control and diabetes groups. The ocular surface disease index questionnaire (OSDI) score was significantly higher in the diabetic patient group. No significant correlation was found between tear osmolarity and OSDI scores.

Conclusion: The ocular discomfort symptoms score in diabetic patients was significantly higher compared to normal eye subjects. Tear osmolarity was not significantly different in diabetic patients. This finding may be explained by a lack of relationship between tear film parameters and diabetic severity; tear film parameters may correlate more with diabetic duration rather than severity. Therefore, studies focused on diabetes duration and tear film parameters are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Optometry
Clinical Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception of African Optometrists on Fellowship of the American Academy of Optometry (AAO): A Cross-Sectional Survey. A Novel Optometry-Led Decision-Making Community Referral Refinement Scheme for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Screening. Comparison of Samfilcon A and Balafilcon A Bandage Contact Lenses in Reducing Postoperative Symptoms After Pterygium Surgery. How Can We Better Inform Patients of the Importance of Contact Lens Compliance?: Current Perspectives. Comparison of the Diagnosis and Management of Demodex Blepharitis Between Eye Care Practitioners in India and Australasia - A Survey-Based Comparison.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1