对lynch综合征妇女在关系、计划生育和心理社会健康方面基因检测主观经验的描述性研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2021-09-14 DOI:10.1186/s13053-021-00194-x
Mari Kalamo, Johanna Mäenpää, Toni Seppälä, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Kirsi Pylvänäinen, Synnöve Staff
{"title":"对lynch综合征妇女在关系、计划生育和心理社会健康方面基因检测主观经验的描述性研究。","authors":"Mari Kalamo,&nbsp;Johanna Mäenpää,&nbsp;Toni Seppälä,&nbsp;Jukka-Pekka Mecklin,&nbsp;Kirsi Pylvänäinen,&nbsp;Synnöve Staff","doi":"10.1186/s13053-021-00194-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to increased risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer, women belonging to known Lynch Syndrome (LS) families are recommended to undergo germline testing. Current practice in Finland is to offer counselling to women with pathogenic variant and advocate risk-reducing surgery (RRS) after completion of childbirth. The present study aimed to clarify the impacts of positive germline testing on family planning and reproductive decisions of these women, which are relatively unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-nine carriers of germline MMR gene pathogenic variant (path_MMR) were identified from the Finnish LS Registry as having genetic testing performed before the age of 45 years and not having undergone hysterectomy or oophorectomy. These women were sent a questionnaire concerning family planning, intimate relationships and psychosocial wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five women (44.3%) responded. Parity of path_MMR carriers (2.1) was slightly higher than parity among Finnish women in general (1.8). No significant differences were found between parity, number of induced abortions or sterilizations before and after genetic testing. Only minority of subjects reported any influence on family planning (20%) or negative impact on feminine self and body image (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The positive germline testing does not seem to have a major negative impact on family planning, intimate relationships or feminine self and body image. According to the open comments, counselling, supportive and empathic attitude of the professionals seem to have a significant impact on this. These results are a valuable addition to the counselling of LS women at reproductive age.</p>","PeriodicalId":55058,"journal":{"name":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439070/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Descriptive study on subjective experience of genetic testing with respect to relationship, family planning and psychosocial wellbeing among women with lynch syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Mari Kalamo,&nbsp;Johanna Mäenpää,&nbsp;Toni Seppälä,&nbsp;Jukka-Pekka Mecklin,&nbsp;Kirsi Pylvänäinen,&nbsp;Synnöve Staff\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13053-021-00194-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Due to increased risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer, women belonging to known Lynch Syndrome (LS) families are recommended to undergo germline testing. Current practice in Finland is to offer counselling to women with pathogenic variant and advocate risk-reducing surgery (RRS) after completion of childbirth. The present study aimed to clarify the impacts of positive germline testing on family planning and reproductive decisions of these women, which are relatively unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-nine carriers of germline MMR gene pathogenic variant (path_MMR) were identified from the Finnish LS Registry as having genetic testing performed before the age of 45 years and not having undergone hysterectomy or oophorectomy. These women were sent a questionnaire concerning family planning, intimate relationships and psychosocial wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five women (44.3%) responded. Parity of path_MMR carriers (2.1) was slightly higher than parity among Finnish women in general (1.8). No significant differences were found between parity, number of induced abortions or sterilizations before and after genetic testing. Only minority of subjects reported any influence on family planning (20%) or negative impact on feminine self and body image (14%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The positive germline testing does not seem to have a major negative impact on family planning, intimate relationships or feminine self and body image. According to the open comments, counselling, supportive and empathic attitude of the professionals seem to have a significant impact on this. These results are a valuable addition to the counselling of LS women at reproductive age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00194-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00194-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:由于子宫内膜癌和卵巢癌的风险增加,属于已知Lynch综合征(LS)家族的女性被推荐进行种系检测。芬兰目前的做法是向携带致病变异的妇女提供咨询,并提倡在分娩后进行降低风险的手术(RRS)。本研究旨在澄清阳性生殖系检测对这些妇女的计划生育和生育决定的影响,这是相对未知的。方法:从芬兰LS登记处确定了79例生殖系MMR基因致病变异(path_MMR)携带者,这些携带者在45岁之前进行了基因检测,没有接受过子宫切除术或卵巢切除术。向这些妇女发送了一份关于计划生育、亲密关系和社会心理健康的问卷。结果:35名女性回应,占44.3%。path_MMR携带者的胎次(2.1)略高于芬兰妇女的一般胎次(1.8)。基因检测前后胎次、人工流产或绝育次数无显著差异。只有少数受试者报告对计划生育有影响(20%)或对女性自我和身体形象有负面影响(14%)。结论:生殖系检测阳性似乎不会对计划生育、亲密关系或女性自我和身体形象产生重大负面影响。根据公开评论,专业人士的咨询、支持和同情态度似乎对这一点有重大影响。这些结果对生育年龄的LS妇女的咨询是一个有价值的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Descriptive study on subjective experience of genetic testing with respect to relationship, family planning and psychosocial wellbeing among women with lynch syndrome.

Background: Due to increased risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer, women belonging to known Lynch Syndrome (LS) families are recommended to undergo germline testing. Current practice in Finland is to offer counselling to women with pathogenic variant and advocate risk-reducing surgery (RRS) after completion of childbirth. The present study aimed to clarify the impacts of positive germline testing on family planning and reproductive decisions of these women, which are relatively unknown.

Methods: Seventy-nine carriers of germline MMR gene pathogenic variant (path_MMR) were identified from the Finnish LS Registry as having genetic testing performed before the age of 45 years and not having undergone hysterectomy or oophorectomy. These women were sent a questionnaire concerning family planning, intimate relationships and psychosocial wellbeing.

Results: Thirty-five women (44.3%) responded. Parity of path_MMR carriers (2.1) was slightly higher than parity among Finnish women in general (1.8). No significant differences were found between parity, number of induced abortions or sterilizations before and after genetic testing. Only minority of subjects reported any influence on family planning (20%) or negative impact on feminine self and body image (14%).

Conclusions: The positive germline testing does not seem to have a major negative impact on family planning, intimate relationships or feminine self and body image. According to the open comments, counselling, supportive and empathic attitude of the professionals seem to have a significant impact on this. These results are a valuable addition to the counselling of LS women at reproductive age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice is an open access journal that publishes articles of interest for the cancer genetics community and serves as a discussion forum for the development appropriate healthcare strategies. Cancer genetics encompasses a wide variety of disciplines and knowledge in the field is rapidly growing, especially as the amount of information linking genetic differences to inherited cancer predispositions continues expanding. With the increased knowledge of genetic variability and how this relates to cancer risk there is a growing demand not only to disseminate this information into clinical practice but also to enable competent debate concerning how such information is managed and what it implies for patient care. Topics covered by the journal include but are not limited to: Original research articles on any aspect of inherited predispositions to cancer. Reviews of inherited cancer predispositions. Application of molecular and cytogenetic analysis to clinical decision making. Clinical aspects of the management of hereditary cancers. Genetic counselling issues associated with cancer genetics. The role of registries in improving health care of patients with an inherited predisposition to cancer.
期刊最新文献
BRCA2 germline mutation carrier with five malignancies: a case report. A genome-wide association study in Swedish colorectal cancer patients with gastric- and prostate cancer in relatives. Breast cancer and ATM mutations: treatment implications. Meeting abstracts from the Annual Conference "Clinical Genetics of Cancer 2023". Validation of a guidelines-based digital tool to assess the need for germline cancer genetic testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1