Safety and efficacy of splenectomy in immune thrombocytopenia.

Background: Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) is characterized by low platelet counts. Splenectomy has been in practice for the treatment of ITP since the early 20th century. We aimed to analyze the data of ITP patients from our hospital who underwent splenectomy and further present the long-term outcome and safety profile in these patients.

Method: This study was a single-center, registry based study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Northern India. Patients aged 18 years or more, who underwent splenectomy after at least one line of therapy, were included in the study. The primary outcome was the overall response rate (ORR) at one month after splenectomy. Secondary outcomes were sustained response, relapse-free survival, factors affecting the ORR, and adverse events after splenectomy.

Results: Forty-five patients of ITP were included in the study. Thirty-six patients underwent splenectomy in the first half (2001-2010), of the study period. The median age of the patients was 38 (19-56) years. The median duration from diagnosis to splenectomy was 1.76 (0.47-2.58) years. The median number of therapy received before splenectomy was 3 (1-6). The overall response rate (ORR) post-splenectomy at day 30 was 89.2% with 61.8% complete response (CR). The ORR was 88.5% at 1-year, with 48.8% CR. The relapse-free survival (RFS) at 5-years was 57.38% (95% Confidence Interval 40.59-71.02%), There was no effect of duration of disease, age, gender, and prior therapy received, on the ORR at one-month. At one year, the platelet response was significantly better in patients who had a CR at one-month than patients who had a partial response at one month. The relapse-free survival was better in patients who achieved CR after 1-month of splenectomy. During the median follow-up of 5.02 (1 month-20 years) years, there were five cases of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI). There was no recorded incidence of perioperative mortality, deep vein thrombosis, or mesenteric thrombosis.

Discussion: Despite the variation in outcome from different studies, splenectomy gives the best possible long-term treatment-free remission amongst all the available second-line agents. It is also, one of the most financially affordable therapies. Despite advantages, the number of ITP patients undergoing splenectomy has been on the decline and largely attributable to the newer and more effective second-line therapies. There is no pre-surgery variable predicting the ORR after splenectomy.

Conclusion: Splenectomy in ITP offers a long-term sustained response at an economical cost.