埃及两所大学医院分离的院内念珠菌的流行及耐药情况。

Q3 Medicine Current Medical Mycology Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.18502/cmm.7.1.6181
Amira M El-Ganiny, Nehal E Yossef, Hend A Kamel
{"title":"埃及两所大学医院分离的院内念珠菌的流行及耐药情况。","authors":"Amira M El-Ganiny,&nbsp;Nehal E Yossef,&nbsp;Hend A Kamel","doi":"10.18502/cmm.7.1.6181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>There is a significant rise in morbidity and mortality of infections caused by <i>Candida</i>. <i>Candida</i> spp. infections are currently ranked fourth among nosocomial infections which are difficult to diagnose and refractory to therapy. Given the differences in susceptibility among various spp., identification of <i>Candida</i> spp. is an important step that leads to the selection of a suitable antifungal.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prevalence study was conducted on 122 <i>Candida</i> isolates. The <i>Candida</i> spp. were identified using Chromogenic agar and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The antifungal susceptibility (AFS) of <i>Candida</i> spp. to amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin was determined by the disc diffusion method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 122 <i>Candida</i> clinical isolates were investigated in this study. <i>Candida albicans</i> with 57.4% (70 isolates) had the highest prevalence rate, while 52 isolates (42.6%) were non-<i>albicans</i> <i>Candida</i> species (NAC). The NAC include <i>Candida krusei</i> (20.4%), <i>Candida tropicalis</i> (6.5%), <i>Candida parapsilolsis</i> (5.7%), <i>Candida dubliniensis</i> (4.9%), and <i>Candida glabrata</i> (4.9%). The AFS showed that the resistance rates of <i>Candida</i> spp. to fluconazole and voriconazole were 13.1% (16 isolates) and 9.8% (12 isolates), respectively. Moreover, only five isolates (4.1%) were resistant to caspofungin. Furthermore, there was no resistance against amphotericin B. The spp. that showed the highest resistance were <i>C. glabrata</i> and <i>C. tropicalis</i>, while the lowest resistance was observed in <i>C. albicans</i> and <i>C. dubliniensis</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, rapid identification of clinical <i>Candida</i> isolates and standard AFS are essential procedures for controlling the rise of resistant NAC spp. in clinical settings. Usage of fluconazole should be restricted, especially in patients with recurrent <i>Candida</i> infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":10863,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Mycology","volume":"7 1","pages":"31-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8443875/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and antifungal drug resistance of nosocomial <i>Candida</i> species isolated from two university hospitals in Egypt.\",\"authors\":\"Amira M El-Ganiny,&nbsp;Nehal E Yossef,&nbsp;Hend A Kamel\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/cmm.7.1.6181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>There is a significant rise in morbidity and mortality of infections caused by <i>Candida</i>. <i>Candida</i> spp. infections are currently ranked fourth among nosocomial infections which are difficult to diagnose and refractory to therapy. Given the differences in susceptibility among various spp., identification of <i>Candida</i> spp. is an important step that leads to the selection of a suitable antifungal.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prevalence study was conducted on 122 <i>Candida</i> isolates. The <i>Candida</i> spp. were identified using Chromogenic agar and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The antifungal susceptibility (AFS) of <i>Candida</i> spp. to amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin was determined by the disc diffusion method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 122 <i>Candida</i> clinical isolates were investigated in this study. <i>Candida albicans</i> with 57.4% (70 isolates) had the highest prevalence rate, while 52 isolates (42.6%) were non-<i>albicans</i> <i>Candida</i> species (NAC). The NAC include <i>Candida krusei</i> (20.4%), <i>Candida tropicalis</i> (6.5%), <i>Candida parapsilolsis</i> (5.7%), <i>Candida dubliniensis</i> (4.9%), and <i>Candida glabrata</i> (4.9%). The AFS showed that the resistance rates of <i>Candida</i> spp. to fluconazole and voriconazole were 13.1% (16 isolates) and 9.8% (12 isolates), respectively. Moreover, only five isolates (4.1%) were resistant to caspofungin. Furthermore, there was no resistance against amphotericin B. The spp. that showed the highest resistance were <i>C. glabrata</i> and <i>C. tropicalis</i>, while the lowest resistance was observed in <i>C. albicans</i> and <i>C. dubliniensis</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, rapid identification of clinical <i>Candida</i> isolates and standard AFS are essential procedures for controlling the rise of resistant NAC spp. in clinical settings. Usage of fluconazole should be restricted, especially in patients with recurrent <i>Candida</i> infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Mycology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"31-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8443875/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Mycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/cmm.7.1.6181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cmm.7.1.6181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景和目的:念珠菌引起的感染的发病率和死亡率显著上升。念珠菌感染是目前医院感染中诊断困难、治疗难的第四大感染。考虑到不同菌种之间的敏感性差异,念珠菌的鉴定是选择合适的抗真菌药物的重要步骤。材料与方法:对122株念珠菌进行流行病学研究。利用显色琼脂和聚合酶链反应(PCR)对念珠菌进行了鉴定。采用圆盘扩散法测定念珠菌对两性霉素B、氟康唑、伏立康唑和卡泊芬净的抗真菌敏感性。结果:本研究共分离念珠菌122株。白色念珠菌感染率最高,为57.4%(70株),非白色念珠菌(NAC)感染率最高,为52株(42.6%)。NAC包括克鲁氏念珠菌(20.4%)、热带念珠菌(6.5%)、副假丝菌(5.7%)、都柏林念珠菌(4.9%)和光秃念珠菌(4.9%)。AFS结果显示,念珠菌对氟康唑和伏立康唑的耐药率分别为13.1%(16株)和9.8%(12株)。此外,仅有5株菌株(4.1%)对caspofungin耐药。对两性霉素b不产生抗性,抗性最高的是裸毛假单胞菌和热带假单胞菌,抗性最低的是白色假单胞菌和都柏林假单胞菌。结论:快速鉴定临床假丝酵母分离株和标准AFS是控制耐药NAC菌株在临床中上升的必要步骤。应限制氟康唑的使用,特别是在反复念珠菌感染的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and antifungal drug resistance of nosocomial Candida species isolated from two university hospitals in Egypt.

Background and purpose: There is a significant rise in morbidity and mortality of infections caused by Candida. Candida spp. infections are currently ranked fourth among nosocomial infections which are difficult to diagnose and refractory to therapy. Given the differences in susceptibility among various spp., identification of Candida spp. is an important step that leads to the selection of a suitable antifungal.

Materials and methods: A prevalence study was conducted on 122 Candida isolates. The Candida spp. were identified using Chromogenic agar and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The antifungal susceptibility (AFS) of Candida spp. to amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin was determined by the disc diffusion method.

Results: In total, 122 Candida clinical isolates were investigated in this study. Candida albicans with 57.4% (70 isolates) had the highest prevalence rate, while 52 isolates (42.6%) were non-albicans Candida species (NAC). The NAC include Candida krusei (20.4%), Candida tropicalis (6.5%), Candida parapsilolsis (5.7%), Candida dubliniensis (4.9%), and Candida glabrata (4.9%). The AFS showed that the resistance rates of Candida spp. to fluconazole and voriconazole were 13.1% (16 isolates) and 9.8% (12 isolates), respectively. Moreover, only five isolates (4.1%) were resistant to caspofungin. Furthermore, there was no resistance against amphotericin B. The spp. that showed the highest resistance were C. glabrata and C. tropicalis, while the lowest resistance was observed in C. albicans and C. dubliniensis.

Conclusion: In conclusion, rapid identification of clinical Candida isolates and standard AFS are essential procedures for controlling the rise of resistant NAC spp. in clinical settings. Usage of fluconazole should be restricted, especially in patients with recurrent Candida infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Mycology
Current Medical Mycology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of yeast probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii cell wall extract on Aspergillus fumigatus allergenicity in A549 cells. Enhanced in-vitro anti-Candida efficacy of Euphorbia milii Des Moul mediated copper nanoparticles against clinically isolated Candida albicans. Evaluation of exoenzyme profiles of Candida albicans species isolated from females with vaginal candidiasis. Candida auris in a tertiary healthcare setting in south India: A case series. In vitro antifungal activity of biosynthesized selenium nanoparticles using plant extracts and six comparators against clinical Fusarium strains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1