{"title":"影响非瓣膜性房颤患者口服非维生素K拮抗剂预防卒中选择的因素","authors":"Susin Park, Nam Kyung Je","doi":"10.1177/10742484211049919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin, except in rare clinical circumstances based on 4 randomized controlled trials comparing each NOAC with warfarin. We aimed to investigate the current NOAC prescription behaviors in alignment with the recent clinical evidence available.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NOAC-using patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were aged ≥65 years on the index date (July 1, 2018) based on nationwide claims data. The types of NOACs being taken were analyzed using chi-squared tests, and factors influencing NOAC selection were identified using multinomial logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6,061 patients were included. Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used NOAC. Patients aged ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.270, confidence interval [CI] = 1.089-1.450) and women (OR = 1.148, CI = 1.011-1.284) were more likely to use apixaban relative to rivaroxaban. Patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism had higher odds of using dabigatran (OR = 1.508, CI = 1.312-1.704) and apixaban (OR = 1.186, CI = 1.026-1.346). Patients with renal disease had higher odds of using apixaban (OR = 1.466, 95% CI = 1.238-1.693). These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profiles reported in pivotal trials and observational studies comparing individual NOACs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most commonly used NOAC. Apixaban was preferred for patients aged ≥75 years, females, and patients with renal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"26 6","pages":"656-664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Influencing the Selection of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Susin Park, Nam Kyung Je\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10742484211049919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin, except in rare clinical circumstances based on 4 randomized controlled trials comparing each NOAC with warfarin. We aimed to investigate the current NOAC prescription behaviors in alignment with the recent clinical evidence available.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NOAC-using patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were aged ≥65 years on the index date (July 1, 2018) based on nationwide claims data. The types of NOACs being taken were analyzed using chi-squared tests, and factors influencing NOAC selection were identified using multinomial logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6,061 patients were included. Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used NOAC. Patients aged ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.270, confidence interval [CI] = 1.089-1.450) and women (OR = 1.148, CI = 1.011-1.284) were more likely to use apixaban relative to rivaroxaban. Patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism had higher odds of using dabigatran (OR = 1.508, CI = 1.312-1.704) and apixaban (OR = 1.186, CI = 1.026-1.346). Patients with renal disease had higher odds of using apixaban (OR = 1.466, 95% CI = 1.238-1.693). These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profiles reported in pivotal trials and observational studies comparing individual NOACs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most commonly used NOAC. Apixaban was preferred for patients aged ≥75 years, females, and patients with renal disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"656-664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211049919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10742484211049919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:主要房颤(AF)指南推荐非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)优于华法林,除了基于4项随机对照试验比较每种NOAC与华法林的罕见临床情况。我们的目的是调查目前NOAC处方行为与最近的临床证据一致。方法:基于全国索赔数据,对指标日期(2018年7月1日)年龄≥65岁的使用noac的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者进行横断面分析。采用卡方检验对NOAC类型进行分析,采用多项logistic回归分析确定NOAC选择的影响因素。结果:共纳入6061例患者。在4种NOAC中,利伐沙班是使用最多的NOAC。年龄≥75岁的患者(优势比[OR] = 1.270,可信区间[CI] = 1.089-1.450)和女性(OR = 1.148, CI = 1.011-1.284)比利伐沙班更倾向于使用阿哌沙班。有卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作/血栓栓塞病史的患者使用达比加群(OR = 1.508, CI = 1.312-1.704)和阿哌沙班(OR = 1.186, CI = 1.026-1.346)的几率更高。肾脏疾病患者使用阿哌沙班的几率更高(OR = 1.466, 95% CI = 1.238-1.693)。这些发现与关键性试验和比较单个noac的观察性研究报告的疗效和安全性一致。结论:在4种NOAC中,利伐沙班是最常用的NOAC。阿哌沙班优先用于年龄≥75岁、女性和肾脏疾病患者。
Factors Influencing the Selection of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.
Background: Major atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines recommend non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) over warfarin, except in rare clinical circumstances based on 4 randomized controlled trials comparing each NOAC with warfarin. We aimed to investigate the current NOAC prescription behaviors in alignment with the recent clinical evidence available.
Method: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of NOAC-using patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were aged ≥65 years on the index date (July 1, 2018) based on nationwide claims data. The types of NOACs being taken were analyzed using chi-squared tests, and factors influencing NOAC selection were identified using multinomial logistic regression analysis.
Results: A total of 6,061 patients were included. Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most used NOAC. Patients aged ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.270, confidence interval [CI] = 1.089-1.450) and women (OR = 1.148, CI = 1.011-1.284) were more likely to use apixaban relative to rivaroxaban. Patients with prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism had higher odds of using dabigatran (OR = 1.508, CI = 1.312-1.704) and apixaban (OR = 1.186, CI = 1.026-1.346). Patients with renal disease had higher odds of using apixaban (OR = 1.466, 95% CI = 1.238-1.693). These findings are consistent with the efficacy and safety profiles reported in pivotal trials and observational studies comparing individual NOACs.
Conclusion: Among the 4 NOACs, rivaroxaban was the most commonly used NOAC. Apixaban was preferred for patients aged ≥75 years, females, and patients with renal disease.