亮线还是彩票?论医疗决策的意义与价值。

Q2 Medicine Journal of market access & health policy Pub Date : 2021-09-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20016689.2021.1981574
Jörg Mahlich, Srirangan Dheban
{"title":"亮线还是彩票?论医疗决策的意义与价值。","authors":"Jörg Mahlich,&nbsp;Srirangan Dheban","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2021.1981574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is widely acknowledged that using p-value thresholds as the basis for making decision on health care spending is not appropriate. In the context of medical decision making, we argue that patient preferences need to be a stronger factor. Depending on attitudes to risk, patients might prefer a medical treatment that performs on average worse than a comparator but offers a small probability of a large gain such as a cure. However, what has been labeled 'value of hope' is not yet fully reflected in the decision-making process of drug approval and health technology assessment (HTA). Therefore, patient risk preferences should be formally incorporated within the decision-making framework for regulatory and reimbursement decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"1981574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/d5/ZJMA_9_1981574.PMC8462922.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bright line or lottery? On significance and value in medical decision making.\",\"authors\":\"Jörg Mahlich,&nbsp;Srirangan Dheban\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20016689.2021.1981574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is widely acknowledged that using p-value thresholds as the basis for making decision on health care spending is not appropriate. In the context of medical decision making, we argue that patient preferences need to be a stronger factor. Depending on attitudes to risk, patients might prefer a medical treatment that performs on average worse than a comparator but offers a small probability of a large gain such as a cure. However, what has been labeled 'value of hope' is not yet fully reflected in the decision-making process of drug approval and health technology assessment (HTA). Therefore, patient risk preferences should be formally incorporated within the decision-making framework for regulatory and reimbursement decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"1981574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/d5/ZJMA_9_1981574.PMC8462922.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2021.1981574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2021.1981574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们普遍认为,使用p值阈值作为医疗保健支出决策的基础是不合适的。在医疗决策的背景下,我们认为患者的偏好需要成为一个更强的因素。根据对风险的态度,患者可能更喜欢一种平均效果比比较物差,但有小概率获得巨大收益(如治愈)的医疗方法。然而,被称为“希望的价值”的东西尚未充分反映在药物批准和卫生技术评估(HTA)的决策过程中。因此,患者的风险偏好应正式纳入监管和报销决策的决策框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bright line or lottery? On significance and value in medical decision making.

It is widely acknowledged that using p-value thresholds as the basis for making decision on health care spending is not appropriate. In the context of medical decision making, we argue that patient preferences need to be a stronger factor. Depending on attitudes to risk, patients might prefer a medical treatment that performs on average worse than a comparator but offers a small probability of a large gain such as a cure. However, what has been labeled 'value of hope' is not yet fully reflected in the decision-making process of drug approval and health technology assessment (HTA). Therefore, patient risk preferences should be formally incorporated within the decision-making framework for regulatory and reimbursement decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Cost Evaluation of Managed Entry Agreement Techniques Using Real-World Data from High-Cost Anticancer Drugs in Thailand. Validation of a De Novo Health Economic Model for Finerenone in Heart Failure with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ≥40. Addressing Unmet Medical Needs in Drug Development: Assessment and Implications for Regulatory and Clinical Development Strategies. Can We Trust PAICs in Rare Diseases? Methodological Challenges and Limitations. Structural Enablers of Rare Disease Treatment Coverage in Latin America and the Caribbean: Lessons from Emicizumab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1