南方古猿普罗米修斯:对南方古猿Bauplan的意义。

IF 1.2 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Folia Primatologica Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-28 DOI:10.1159/000519723
Robin Huw Crompton, Juliet McClymont, Sarah Elton, Susannah Thorpe, William Sellers, Jason Heaton, Travis Rayne Pickering, Todd Pataky, Kristian J Carlson, Tea Jashashvili, Amélie Beaudet, Laurent Bruxelles, Ethan Goh, Kathleen Kuman, Ronald Clarke
{"title":"南方古猿普罗米修斯:对南方古猿Bauplan的意义。","authors":"Robin Huw Crompton,&nbsp;Juliet McClymont,&nbsp;Sarah Elton,&nbsp;Susannah Thorpe,&nbsp;William Sellers,&nbsp;Jason Heaton,&nbsp;Travis Rayne Pickering,&nbsp;Todd Pataky,&nbsp;Kristian J Carlson,&nbsp;Tea Jashashvili,&nbsp;Amélie Beaudet,&nbsp;Laurent Bruxelles,&nbsp;Ethan Goh,&nbsp;Kathleen Kuman,&nbsp;Ronald Clarke","doi":"10.1159/000519723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The StW 573 skeleton of Australopithecus prometheus from Sterkfontein Member 2 is some 93% complete and thus by far the most complete member of that genus yet found. Firmly dated at 3.67 Ma, it is one of the earliest specimens of its genus. A crucial aspect of interpretation of locomotor behaviour from fossil remains is an understanding of the palaeoenvironment in which the individual lived and the manner in which it would have used it. While the value of this ecomorphological approach is largely accepted, it has not been widely used as a stable framework on which to build evolutionary biomechanical interpretations. Here, we collate the available evidence on StW 573's anatomy in order, as far as currently possible, to reconstruct what might have been this individual's realized and potential niche. We explore the concept of a common Australopithecus \"bauplan\" by comparing the morphology and ecological context of StW 573 to that of paenocontemporaneous australopiths including Australopithecus anamensis and KSD-VP-1/1 Australopithecus afarensis. Each was probably substantially arboreal and woodland-dwelling, relying substantially on arboreal resources. We use a hypothesis-driven approach, tested by: virtual experiments, in the case of extinct species; biomechanical analyses of the locomotor behaviour of living great ape species; and analogical experiments with human subjects. From these, we conclude that the habitual locomotor mode of all australopiths was upright bipedalism, whether on the ground or on branches. Some later australopiths such as Australopithecus sediba undoubtedly became more terrestrial, allowing sacrifice of arboreal stability in favour of manual dexterity. Indeed, modern humans retain arboreal climbing skills but have further sacrificed arboreal effectiveness for enhanced ability to sustain striding terrestrial bipedalism over much greater distances. We compare StW 573's locomotor adaptations to those of living great apes and protohominins, and agree with those earlier observers who suggest that the common panin-hominin last common ancestor was postcranially more like Gorilla than Pan.</p>","PeriodicalId":50437,"journal":{"name":"Folia Primatologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"StW 573 Australopithecus prometheus: Its Significance for an Australopith Bauplan.\",\"authors\":\"Robin Huw Crompton,&nbsp;Juliet McClymont,&nbsp;Sarah Elton,&nbsp;Susannah Thorpe,&nbsp;William Sellers,&nbsp;Jason Heaton,&nbsp;Travis Rayne Pickering,&nbsp;Todd Pataky,&nbsp;Kristian J Carlson,&nbsp;Tea Jashashvili,&nbsp;Amélie Beaudet,&nbsp;Laurent Bruxelles,&nbsp;Ethan Goh,&nbsp;Kathleen Kuman,&nbsp;Ronald Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000519723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The StW 573 skeleton of Australopithecus prometheus from Sterkfontein Member 2 is some 93% complete and thus by far the most complete member of that genus yet found. Firmly dated at 3.67 Ma, it is one of the earliest specimens of its genus. A crucial aspect of interpretation of locomotor behaviour from fossil remains is an understanding of the palaeoenvironment in which the individual lived and the manner in which it would have used it. While the value of this ecomorphological approach is largely accepted, it has not been widely used as a stable framework on which to build evolutionary biomechanical interpretations. Here, we collate the available evidence on StW 573's anatomy in order, as far as currently possible, to reconstruct what might have been this individual's realized and potential niche. We explore the concept of a common Australopithecus \\\"bauplan\\\" by comparing the morphology and ecological context of StW 573 to that of paenocontemporaneous australopiths including Australopithecus anamensis and KSD-VP-1/1 Australopithecus afarensis. Each was probably substantially arboreal and woodland-dwelling, relying substantially on arboreal resources. We use a hypothesis-driven approach, tested by: virtual experiments, in the case of extinct species; biomechanical analyses of the locomotor behaviour of living great ape species; and analogical experiments with human subjects. From these, we conclude that the habitual locomotor mode of all australopiths was upright bipedalism, whether on the ground or on branches. Some later australopiths such as Australopithecus sediba undoubtedly became more terrestrial, allowing sacrifice of arboreal stability in favour of manual dexterity. Indeed, modern humans retain arboreal climbing skills but have further sacrificed arboreal effectiveness for enhanced ability to sustain striding terrestrial bipedalism over much greater distances. We compare StW 573's locomotor adaptations to those of living great apes and protohominins, and agree with those earlier observers who suggest that the common panin-hominin last common ancestor was postcranially more like Gorilla than Pan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia Primatologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia Primatologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519723\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Primatologica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

来自Sterkfontein 2成员的StW 573南方古猿普罗米修斯骨架大约有93%完整,因此是迄今为止发现的最完整的该属成员。它的确切年代为3.67 Ma,是其属中最早的标本之一。从化石遗骸中解释运动行为的一个关键方面是了解个体生活的古环境以及它使用这种环境的方式。虽然这种生态形态学方法的价值在很大程度上被接受,但它尚未被广泛用作构建进化生物力学解释的稳定框架。在这里,我们整理了有关StW 573解剖结构的现有证据,以便尽可能地重建这个人可能已经实现和潜在的生态位。我们通过比较StW 573的形态和生态环境,探讨了共同南方古猿“bauplan”的概念,并将其与包括南方古猿anamensis和KSD-VP-1/1南方古猿afarensis在内的古猿类群进行了比较。每一种都可能主要生活在树木和林地中,主要依靠树木资源。我们使用假设驱动的方法,通过以下方式进行测试:虚拟实验,在灭绝物种的情况下;现存类人猿运动行为的生物力学分析用人类做类比实验。由此,我们得出结论,所有南方古猿的习惯性运动模式都是直立的两足动物,无论是在地面上还是在树枝上。一些后来的南方古猿,如南方古猿sediba,无疑变得更倾向于陆生,为了灵巧的双手而牺牲了树上的稳定性。的确,现代人类保留了攀树的技能,但为了在更远的距离上以两足行走的方式行走,他们进一步牺牲了攀树的能力。我们将StW 573的运动适应能力与现存的类人猿和原人类进行了比较,并同意早期观察人士的观点,即共同的潘宁-人类最后的共同祖先在颅骨后更像大猩猩而不是潘宁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
StW 573 Australopithecus prometheus: Its Significance for an Australopith Bauplan.

The StW 573 skeleton of Australopithecus prometheus from Sterkfontein Member 2 is some 93% complete and thus by far the most complete member of that genus yet found. Firmly dated at 3.67 Ma, it is one of the earliest specimens of its genus. A crucial aspect of interpretation of locomotor behaviour from fossil remains is an understanding of the palaeoenvironment in which the individual lived and the manner in which it would have used it. While the value of this ecomorphological approach is largely accepted, it has not been widely used as a stable framework on which to build evolutionary biomechanical interpretations. Here, we collate the available evidence on StW 573's anatomy in order, as far as currently possible, to reconstruct what might have been this individual's realized and potential niche. We explore the concept of a common Australopithecus "bauplan" by comparing the morphology and ecological context of StW 573 to that of paenocontemporaneous australopiths including Australopithecus anamensis and KSD-VP-1/1 Australopithecus afarensis. Each was probably substantially arboreal and woodland-dwelling, relying substantially on arboreal resources. We use a hypothesis-driven approach, tested by: virtual experiments, in the case of extinct species; biomechanical analyses of the locomotor behaviour of living great ape species; and analogical experiments with human subjects. From these, we conclude that the habitual locomotor mode of all australopiths was upright bipedalism, whether on the ground or on branches. Some later australopiths such as Australopithecus sediba undoubtedly became more terrestrial, allowing sacrifice of arboreal stability in favour of manual dexterity. Indeed, modern humans retain arboreal climbing skills but have further sacrificed arboreal effectiveness for enhanced ability to sustain striding terrestrial bipedalism over much greater distances. We compare StW 573's locomotor adaptations to those of living great apes and protohominins, and agree with those earlier observers who suggest that the common panin-hominin last common ancestor was postcranially more like Gorilla than Pan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Primatologica
Folia Primatologica 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Recognizing that research in human biology must be founded on a comparative knowledge of our closest relatives, this journal is the natural scientist''s ideal means of access to the best of current primate research. ''Folia Primatologica'' covers fields as diverse as molecular biology and social behaviour, and features articles on ecology, conservation, palaeontology, systematics and functional anatomy. In-depth articles and invited reviews are contributed by the world’s leading primatologists. In addition, special issues provide rapid peer-reviewed publication of conference proceedings. ''Folia Primatologica'' is one of the top-rated primatology publications and is acknowledged worldwide as a high-impact core journal for primatologists, zoologists and anthropologists.
期刊最新文献
Measuring behavioral synchronization and spatial cohesion in the activity budgets of three adult white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar) dyads in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Short-term conservation education influences Ugandan adolescents' knowledge, attitudes and investment decisions. Behavioral responses of free-ranging Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) to sudden loud noises. Primate focused conservation education in Paraguay: Doing something Para La Tierra. Arts-based analysis of conservation education field trips for young people to observe wild lemurs in Southern Madagascar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1