{"title":"[Gundersen全结膜瓣术后5、6年的部分视力恢复]。","authors":"Y Abu Dail, L Daas, F A Flockerzi, B Seitz","doi":"10.1007/s00347-021-01503-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We present the results of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) after previous treatment with a total conjunctival flap in two patients.</p><p><strong>Case reports: </strong>Patient 1, a 66-year-old with a history of bilateral cement chemical burn in 1986 and external right-sided limbokeratoplasty in 2008 was treated externally with a total conjunctival flap in the right eye in 2014 due to a persistent corneal ulcer with imminent perforation. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the right eye was light sensation, intraocular pressure on palpation was within normal range. Clinically, total conjunctival flap was present. Patient 2 was treated externally in May 2015 due to acanthamoeba keratitis in the left eye with a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). A re-DALK was also performed externally in the same month. A third DALK was performed externally in August 2015 due to a persistent corneal ulcer, followed by a total conjunctival flap 2 weeks later. BCVA of the left eye was light sensation and intraocular pressure on palpation was within the normal range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient 1 was treated with removal of the conjunctival flap in the right eye and penetrating central re-keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 8.5/8.75 mm). Simultaneously, lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation were performed (as a triple procedure). Additionally, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were performed. BCVA 6 months postoperatively was 0.1. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection. Patient 2 was treated on the left eye with removal of the conjunctival flap and a penetrating central keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 7.0/7.5 mm). An AMT as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were simultaneously performed. Cataract surgery was performed 3 months postoperatively and BCVA of the right eye was 0.1 thereafter. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conjunctival flap is a treatment of last resort of the (almost) penetrated corneal ulcer, which is to be used only when a keratoplasty is technically impossible. Provided the eye structure and retinal function are preserved, partial visual rehabilitation can possibly be achieved through a PKP after excision of the conjunctival flap, even years after corneal blindness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54676,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologe","volume":"119 2","pages":"203-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Partial visual rehabilitation 5 and 6 years after a Gundersen total conjunctival flap procedure].\",\"authors\":\"Y Abu Dail, L Daas, F A Flockerzi, B Seitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00347-021-01503-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We present the results of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) after previous treatment with a total conjunctival flap in two patients.</p><p><strong>Case reports: </strong>Patient 1, a 66-year-old with a history of bilateral cement chemical burn in 1986 and external right-sided limbokeratoplasty in 2008 was treated externally with a total conjunctival flap in the right eye in 2014 due to a persistent corneal ulcer with imminent perforation. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the right eye was light sensation, intraocular pressure on palpation was within normal range. Clinically, total conjunctival flap was present. Patient 2 was treated externally in May 2015 due to acanthamoeba keratitis in the left eye with a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). A re-DALK was also performed externally in the same month. A third DALK was performed externally in August 2015 due to a persistent corneal ulcer, followed by a total conjunctival flap 2 weeks later. BCVA of the left eye was light sensation and intraocular pressure on palpation was within the normal range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patient 1 was treated with removal of the conjunctival flap in the right eye and penetrating central re-keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 8.5/8.75 mm). Simultaneously, lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation were performed (as a triple procedure). Additionally, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were performed. BCVA 6 months postoperatively was 0.1. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection. Patient 2 was treated on the left eye with removal of the conjunctival flap and a penetrating central keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 7.0/7.5 mm). An AMT as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were simultaneously performed. Cataract surgery was performed 3 months postoperatively and BCVA of the right eye was 0.1 thereafter. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The conjunctival flap is a treatment of last resort of the (almost) penetrated corneal ulcer, which is to be used only when a keratoplasty is technically impossible. Provided the eye structure and retinal function are preserved, partial visual rehabilitation can possibly be achieved through a PKP after excision of the conjunctival flap, even years after corneal blindness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"volume\":\"119 2\",\"pages\":\"203-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01503-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologe","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01503-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Partial visual rehabilitation 5 and 6 years after a Gundersen total conjunctival flap procedure].
Background: We present the results of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) after previous treatment with a total conjunctival flap in two patients.
Case reports: Patient 1, a 66-year-old with a history of bilateral cement chemical burn in 1986 and external right-sided limbokeratoplasty in 2008 was treated externally with a total conjunctival flap in the right eye in 2014 due to a persistent corneal ulcer with imminent perforation. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the right eye was light sensation, intraocular pressure on palpation was within normal range. Clinically, total conjunctival flap was present. Patient 2 was treated externally in May 2015 due to acanthamoeba keratitis in the left eye with a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). A re-DALK was also performed externally in the same month. A third DALK was performed externally in August 2015 due to a persistent corneal ulcer, followed by a total conjunctival flap 2 weeks later. BCVA of the left eye was light sensation and intraocular pressure on palpation was within the normal range.
Results: Patient 1 was treated with removal of the conjunctival flap in the right eye and penetrating central re-keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 8.5/8.75 mm). Simultaneously, lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation were performed (as a triple procedure). Additionally, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were performed. BCVA 6 months postoperatively was 0.1. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection. Patient 2 was treated on the left eye with removal of the conjunctival flap and a penetrating central keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 7.0/7.5 mm). An AMT as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were simultaneously performed. Cataract surgery was performed 3 months postoperatively and BCVA of the right eye was 0.1 thereafter. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection.
Conclusion: The conjunctival flap is a treatment of last resort of the (almost) penetrated corneal ulcer, which is to be used only when a keratoplasty is technically impossible. Provided the eye structure and retinal function are preserved, partial visual rehabilitation can possibly be achieved through a PKP after excision of the conjunctival flap, even years after corneal blindness.
期刊介绍:
Der Ophthalmologe is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of ophthalmology. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of ophthalmologists.
Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange.
Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy.
Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.