这对我意味着什么?从在线论坛对ECFMG 2023认证要求的看法。

Mohammed Ahmed Rashid, Victoria Smith, Sean Tackett, Zakia Arfeen, Faraz Mughal
{"title":"这对我意味着什么?从在线论坛对ECFMG 2023认证要求的看法。","authors":"Mohammed Ahmed Rashid,&nbsp;Victoria Smith,&nbsp;Sean Tackett,&nbsp;Zakia Arfeen,&nbsp;Faraz Mughal","doi":"10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2010, the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) announced that as of 2023, physicians applying to train and practice in the United States will be required to graduate from a medical school that has been accredited using criteria such as those developed by the World Federation for Medical Education. This study analyzed posts on the Student Doctor Network (SDN) online forum that refer to this accreditation requirement to investigate how it has been perceived and understood by current and prospective medical students. A keyword search of relevant terms was used to identify posts discussing the accreditation requirement on the SDN online forum, which were subjected to thematic analysis. There were a total of 83 posts from 49 distinct user accounts between May 2012 and January 2020. Seven themes were identified in total; four whose overall purpose was to seek or offer advice and three whose overall purpose was commentary. Themes relating to advice included applications and admissions, future career planning, personal circumstances, and countryspecific issues. Themes relating to commentary included the accreditation requirement policy itself, the potential implications of the requirement, and the educational quality of non-U.S. medical schools. Only half of web links on these posts were to the ECFMG website for official information about the requirement. Although a variety of different perspectives about the ECFMG accreditation requirement were expressed on an online forum for student doctors, the overall number of posts was low, which suggests that the requirement has not been a frequent topic of discussion on this platform. The insights gained from posts suggest personal opinions about the requirement and consequences for individual student application and career choices were the main areas of interest. Signposting to official information channels may help to raise awareness about the requirement and tackle areas of uncertainty and confusion about its implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":91752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical regulation","volume":"107 2","pages":"49-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611736/pdf/EMS135387.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Will It Mean for Me? Perceptions of the ECFMG 2023 Accreditation Requirement from an Online Forum.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Ahmed Rashid,&nbsp;Victoria Smith,&nbsp;Sean Tackett,&nbsp;Zakia Arfeen,&nbsp;Faraz Mughal\",\"doi\":\"10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2010, the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) announced that as of 2023, physicians applying to train and practice in the United States will be required to graduate from a medical school that has been accredited using criteria such as those developed by the World Federation for Medical Education. This study analyzed posts on the Student Doctor Network (SDN) online forum that refer to this accreditation requirement to investigate how it has been perceived and understood by current and prospective medical students. A keyword search of relevant terms was used to identify posts discussing the accreditation requirement on the SDN online forum, which were subjected to thematic analysis. There were a total of 83 posts from 49 distinct user accounts between May 2012 and January 2020. Seven themes were identified in total; four whose overall purpose was to seek or offer advice and three whose overall purpose was commentary. Themes relating to advice included applications and admissions, future career planning, personal circumstances, and countryspecific issues. Themes relating to commentary included the accreditation requirement policy itself, the potential implications of the requirement, and the educational quality of non-U.S. medical schools. Only half of web links on these posts were to the ECFMG website for official information about the requirement. Although a variety of different perspectives about the ECFMG accreditation requirement were expressed on an online forum for student doctors, the overall number of posts was low, which suggests that the requirement has not been a frequent topic of discussion on this platform. The insights gained from posts suggest personal opinions about the requirement and consequences for individual student application and career choices were the main areas of interest. Signposting to official information channels may help to raise awareness about the requirement and tackle areas of uncertainty and confusion about its implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical regulation\",\"volume\":\"107 2\",\"pages\":\"49-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611736/pdf/EMS135387.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-107.2.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2010年,外国医学毕业生教育委员会(ECFMG)宣布,从2023年起,申请在美国培训和执业的医生将被要求从使用诸如世界医学教育联合会制定的标准认可的医学院毕业。本研究分析了学生医生网络(SDN)在线论坛上有关这一认证要求的帖子,以调查当前和未来医科学生对这一要求的看法和理解。使用关键词搜索相关术语来识别SDN在线论坛上讨论认证要求的帖子,并对其进行专题分析。从2012年5月到2020年1月,共有来自49个不同用户账户的83条帖子。共确定了七个主题;其中四个的总体目的是寻求或提供建议,三个的总体目的是评论。咨询的主题包括申请和录取、未来职业规划、个人情况和国家具体问题。与评论相关的主题包括认证要求政策本身,要求的潜在影响,以及非美国的教育质量。医学院校。在这些帖子中,只有一半的网站链接指向ECFMG网站,以获取有关该要求的官方信息。尽管关于ECFMG认证要求的各种不同观点在学生医生的在线论坛上表达,但帖子的总数很低,这表明该要求并未成为该平台上经常讨论的话题。从帖子中获得的见解表明,个人对个人申请和职业选择的要求和后果的看法是主要的兴趣领域。在官方信息渠道上发布路标可能有助于提高对这一要求的认识,并解决在实施过程中存在的不确定性和混乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Will It Mean for Me? Perceptions of the ECFMG 2023 Accreditation Requirement from an Online Forum.

In 2010, the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) announced that as of 2023, physicians applying to train and practice in the United States will be required to graduate from a medical school that has been accredited using criteria such as those developed by the World Federation for Medical Education. This study analyzed posts on the Student Doctor Network (SDN) online forum that refer to this accreditation requirement to investigate how it has been perceived and understood by current and prospective medical students. A keyword search of relevant terms was used to identify posts discussing the accreditation requirement on the SDN online forum, which were subjected to thematic analysis. There were a total of 83 posts from 49 distinct user accounts between May 2012 and January 2020. Seven themes were identified in total; four whose overall purpose was to seek or offer advice and three whose overall purpose was commentary. Themes relating to advice included applications and admissions, future career planning, personal circumstances, and countryspecific issues. Themes relating to commentary included the accreditation requirement policy itself, the potential implications of the requirement, and the educational quality of non-U.S. medical schools. Only half of web links on these posts were to the ECFMG website for official information about the requirement. Although a variety of different perspectives about the ECFMG accreditation requirement were expressed on an online forum for student doctors, the overall number of posts was low, which suggests that the requirement has not been a frequent topic of discussion on this platform. The insights gained from posts suggest personal opinions about the requirement and consequences for individual student application and career choices were the main areas of interest. Signposting to official information channels may help to raise awareness about the requirement and tackle areas of uncertainty and confusion about its implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulating Professions: The Emergence of Professional Self-Regulation in Four Canadian Provinces COVID-denial Invites License Revocation in the UK Regulatory Body Perspectives on Complaints and Disciplinary Action Processes for Health Professionals Physician Well-Being and Patient Safety: The Crossroads to the Best in Medicine What Could (Or Should) Be the Regulatory Response to the Wicked Problem of Climate Change?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1