认知刺激对痴呆患者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Q3 Medicine East Asian Archives of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.12809/eaap2102
Y L Wong, C P W Cheng, C S M Wong, S N Wong, H L Wong, S Tse, G H Y Wong, W C Chan
{"title":"认知刺激对痴呆患者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Y L Wong,&nbsp;C P W Cheng,&nbsp;C S M Wong,&nbsp;S N Wong,&nbsp;H L Wong,&nbsp;S Tse,&nbsp;G H Y Wong,&nbsp;W C Chan","doi":"10.12809/eaap2102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive stimulation (CS) on cognition, depressive symptoms, and quality of life in persons with dementia. Factors affecting the treatment effect were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed on databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library up to 7 March 2019. Only randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of CS in persons with dementia were included. The outcome measures were cognitive function, depressive symptoms, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 randomised controlled trials with a total of 1251 participants (intervention group: 674; control group: 577) were included for meta-analysis. Most participants had mild to moderate dementia. CS had a significant positive small-to-moderate effect on cognition (Hedges's g = 0.313, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity of CS was low to moderate (Q=30.5854, df=19, p < 0.05, I2 = 37.877%). Inconclusive results were found for depressive symptoms and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CS has a significant positive effect on cognitive function, but its effect on depressive symptoms and quality of life was inconclusive. Future studies with more robust methodology establishing evidence of its efficacy are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":39171,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive Stimulation for Persons with Dementia: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Y L Wong,&nbsp;C P W Cheng,&nbsp;C S M Wong,&nbsp;S N Wong,&nbsp;H L Wong,&nbsp;S Tse,&nbsp;G H Y Wong,&nbsp;W C Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.12809/eaap2102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive stimulation (CS) on cognition, depressive symptoms, and quality of life in persons with dementia. Factors affecting the treatment effect were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was performed on databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library up to 7 March 2019. Only randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of CS in persons with dementia were included. The outcome measures were cognitive function, depressive symptoms, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 randomised controlled trials with a total of 1251 participants (intervention group: 674; control group: 577) were included for meta-analysis. Most participants had mild to moderate dementia. CS had a significant positive small-to-moderate effect on cognition (Hedges's g = 0.313, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity of CS was low to moderate (Q=30.5854, df=19, p < 0.05, I2 = 37.877%). Inconclusive results were found for depressive symptoms and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CS has a significant positive effect on cognitive function, but its effect on depressive symptoms and quality of life was inconclusive. Future studies with more robust methodology establishing evidence of its efficacy are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap2102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap2102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:我们旨在对认知刺激(CS)对痴呆患者的认知、抑郁症状和生活质量的影响进行最新的系统回顾和荟萃分析。考察了影响治疗效果的因素。方法:检索截至2019年3月7日的MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL Plus和Cochrane Library数据库的文献。仅纳入了调查CS对痴呆患者影响的随机对照试验。结果测量是认知功能、抑郁症状和生活质量。结果:20项随机对照试验,共1251名受试者(干预组:674名;对照组577例)纳入meta分析。大多数参与者患有轻度至中度痴呆症。CS对认知有显著的小到中等的正影响(Hedges’s g = 0.313, p < 0.001)。CS的异质性为中低(Q=30.5854, df=19, p < 0.05, I2 = 37.877%)。抑郁症状与生活质量之间的关系尚无定论。结论:CS对认知功能有显著的积极作用,但对抑郁症状和生活质量的影响尚无定论。未来的研究需要更有力的方法来确定其有效性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive Stimulation for Persons with Dementia: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: We aim to provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive stimulation (CS) on cognition, depressive symptoms, and quality of life in persons with dementia. Factors affecting the treatment effect were examined.

Methods: A literature search was performed on databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library up to 7 March 2019. Only randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of CS in persons with dementia were included. The outcome measures were cognitive function, depressive symptoms, and quality of life.

Results: 20 randomised controlled trials with a total of 1251 participants (intervention group: 674; control group: 577) were included for meta-analysis. Most participants had mild to moderate dementia. CS had a significant positive small-to-moderate effect on cognition (Hedges's g = 0.313, p < 0.001). Heterogeneity of CS was low to moderate (Q=30.5854, df=19, p < 0.05, I2 = 37.877%). Inconclusive results were found for depressive symptoms and quality of life.

Conclusion: CS has a significant positive effect on cognitive function, but its effect on depressive symptoms and quality of life was inconclusive. Future studies with more robust methodology establishing evidence of its efficacy are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Developing the Youth Mental Health Clinic in Hong Kong: refocus and revisit of clinical practice for youth in the new millennium. Factor analysis of the Chinese version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient 10 and its association with schizotypal traits in adolescents and young adults in Hong Kong. Normal pressure hydrocephalus disguising psychosis: a case report. Paediatric bipolar disorder with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a case report. Rivastigmine for treatment-refractory posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1