{"title":"确定小肾肿块的最佳治疗策略。","authors":"Marc Dall'Era, Primo N Lara","doi":"10.3233/KCA-200008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small renal masses are typically defined as solid, contrast enhancing kidney tumors under 4 cm in size, corresponding to American Joint Cancer Commission TNM stage T1a. They are most commonly asymptomatic and incidentally discovered, a classic by-product of increasing use of cross-sectional imaging for any variety of unrelated abdominal symptoms. The risk that a small renal mass represents a malignancy is closely tied to size with nearly 20% of tumors under 4 cm being benign. [1] Also, of the small renal masses that are kidney cancer, the majority have indolent histology with prolonged natural history. In this issue of the journal, Drs. Ellis and Messing provide a comprehensive review of the management of small renal masses [2]. They conclude that “short and intermediate-term data demonstrate that active surveillance with the option for delayed intervention is a safe management approach with similar survival outcomes to primary intervention (PI) at 2 and 5 years, is cost effective, and prevents overtreatment, especially in patients with significant comorbidities”. As with low-risk prostate cancer, over-detection and over-treatment of small renal masses is an important clinical problem. A 2017 study by Welch","PeriodicalId":74039,"journal":{"name":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","volume":"5 3","pages":"137-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-200008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the Optimal Management Strategy for Small Renal Masses.\",\"authors\":\"Marc Dall'Era, Primo N Lara\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/KCA-200008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small renal masses are typically defined as solid, contrast enhancing kidney tumors under 4 cm in size, corresponding to American Joint Cancer Commission TNM stage T1a. They are most commonly asymptomatic and incidentally discovered, a classic by-product of increasing use of cross-sectional imaging for any variety of unrelated abdominal symptoms. The risk that a small renal mass represents a malignancy is closely tied to size with nearly 20% of tumors under 4 cm being benign. [1] Also, of the small renal masses that are kidney cancer, the majority have indolent histology with prolonged natural history. In this issue of the journal, Drs. Ellis and Messing provide a comprehensive review of the management of small renal masses [2]. They conclude that “short and intermediate-term data demonstrate that active surveillance with the option for delayed intervention is a safe management approach with similar survival outcomes to primary intervention (PI) at 2 and 5 years, is cost effective, and prevents overtreatment, especially in patients with significant comorbidities”. As with low-risk prostate cancer, over-detection and over-treatment of small renal masses is an important clinical problem. A 2017 study by Welch\",\"PeriodicalId\":74039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"137-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/KCA-200008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-200008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney cancer (Clifton, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/KCA-200008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defining the Optimal Management Strategy for Small Renal Masses.
Small renal masses are typically defined as solid, contrast enhancing kidney tumors under 4 cm in size, corresponding to American Joint Cancer Commission TNM stage T1a. They are most commonly asymptomatic and incidentally discovered, a classic by-product of increasing use of cross-sectional imaging for any variety of unrelated abdominal symptoms. The risk that a small renal mass represents a malignancy is closely tied to size with nearly 20% of tumors under 4 cm being benign. [1] Also, of the small renal masses that are kidney cancer, the majority have indolent histology with prolonged natural history. In this issue of the journal, Drs. Ellis and Messing provide a comprehensive review of the management of small renal masses [2]. They conclude that “short and intermediate-term data demonstrate that active surveillance with the option for delayed intervention is a safe management approach with similar survival outcomes to primary intervention (PI) at 2 and 5 years, is cost effective, and prevents overtreatment, especially in patients with significant comorbidities”. As with low-risk prostate cancer, over-detection and over-treatment of small renal masses is an important clinical problem. A 2017 study by Welch